May 14, 2013, at 4:05 PM

Original link

The Council meets in Regular Session in the Council Chambers this day at 4:05 PM.

I.   DISCLOSURES

OF PECUNIARY INTEREST

At 4:10 PM Councillor D. Brown enters the meeting.

II.   REVIEW OF

CONFIDENTIAL MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED IN PUBLIC

III.   ADDED

REPORTS

1.            12th Report of Planning and Environment Committee 2.            9th Report of Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee

IV.   COMMITTEE

OF THE WHOLE, IN CAMERA

MOTION FOR IN CAMERA SESSION

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen

Approve that Council rise and go into Committee of the Whole, in camera, for the purpose of considering the following:

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

V.   RECOGNITIONS

1.   Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest

That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary interests were disclosed.

2.   City of London At

Your Service Video

That it BE NOTED that the City Manager presented the new City of London “At Your Service” video and acknowledged the City’s partnership with Fanshawe College on the project.

3.   London Hydro Inc. -

2012 Annual Meeting of the Shareholder Annual Resolutions

That the following actions be taken arising from the 2012 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for the London Hydro Inc.:   a)         the attached presentation from Vinay Sharma, Chief Executive Officer, London Hydro Inc. and Peter Johnson, Board Chair, London Hydro Inc., as well as the London Hydro Annual Report 2012 BE RECEIVED;   b)         on the recommendation of the City Manager, the by-law (Attachment “A”) appended to the staff report dated May 13, 2013 BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on May 14, 2013 to:   i)          ratify and confirm the Annual Resolutions of the Shareholder of the London Hydro Inc. attached as Schedule “1” to the by-law; and,   ii)         authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Annual Resolutions of the Shareholder of the London Hydro Inc. attached as Schedule “1” to the by-law; and   c)         the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to complete its review of the Shareholder’s Declaration, in liaison with London Hydro, and in conjunction with the shared services review, and report back with any suggested changes that may be in order by September 2013.

4.   London &

Middlesex Housing Corporation - 2012 Annual Meeting of the Shareholder Annual Resolutions

That the following actions be taken arising from the 2012 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for the London & Middlesex Housing Corporation:   a)         the attached presentation from Steve Matthew, Executive Director, London & Middlesex Housing Corporation, as well as the London & Middlesex Housing Corporation Annual Report 2012 BE RECEIVED;   b)         on the recommendation of the City Manager, the by-law (Attachment “A”) appended to the staff report dated May 13, 2013 BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on May 14, 2013 to:   i)          ratify and confirm the Annual Resolutions of the Shareholder of the London & Middlesex Housing Corporation attached as Schedule “1” to the by-law; and,   ii)         authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Annual Resolutions of the Shareholder of the London & Middlesex Housing Corporation attached as Schedule “1” to the by-law.

VI.   CONFIRMATION

AND SIGNING OF THE MINUTES OF THE NINTH MEETING HELD ON APRIL 30, 2013

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Seconded by Councillor S.E. White

Approve the Minutes of the 9th Meeting held on April 30, 2013.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

VII.   COMMUNICATIONS

AND PETITIONS

Moved by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen

Seconded by Councillor S.E. White

Approve referral of the following communications for consideration with the noted clauses:

VIII.   MOTIONS OF

WHICH NOTICE IS GIVEN

IX.   REPORTS

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Approve clauses 1 to 10.

5.   Development Charges

Policy Review - Local Services Policy

That the following recommendation BE REFERRED back to staff for further dialogue and report back at the June 10, 2013 meeting of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee:   “That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, with the concurrence of the Managing Director, Environmental & Engineering Services and City Engineer, the following changes to the City’s “local service” definitions BE APPROVED in principle:   a)            watermain oversizing be claimable from the City Services Reserve Fund; b)            stormwater open channel oversizing be claimable from the Urban Works Reserve Fund - Minor Storm Works;   c)            the definition of Sanitary Sewer Oversizing be reconsidered subject to information to be provided by the Master Servicing Study consultants; and   d)         the definition of storm water management works be more broadly defined as all works required to provide stormwater management servicing that satisfies the requirements of a Class Environmental Assessment process;   it being noted that the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee (SPPC) heard the attached presentation from the Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer, and the Manager, Development Finance, and verbal delegations from Jim Kennedy, President, London Development Institute, and Sandy Levin, 59 Longbow Road, with respect to this matter; it being further noted that the SPPC also received a written communication from Jim Kennedy, President, London Development Institute, with respect to this matter.”

6.   Managing Director,

Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer - Development Charge Policy - DC Area Specific Charges

That the following recommendation BE REFERRED back to staff for further dialogue and report back at the June 10, 2013 meeting of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee:   “That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer with the concurrence of the Managing Director of Planning and City Planner and Managing Director, Development & Compliance Services & Chief Building Official, the following actions be taken with respect to amending the City’s policy with respect to DC area specific rating:   a)         the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to complete the 2014 DC rate calculations and draft the 2014 DC by-law amendments necessary to implement differential DC rate calculations for SWM facilities in the Central Thames Watershed (CTW) Area identified in Appendix B to the staff report dated May 13, 2013; and   b)         the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to develop the implementation rules (including any transitional arrangements and further refinement of the boundary) related to establishing the Central Thames Watershed SWM DC Area Specific Rate for inclusion in the 2014 DC by-law;   it being noted that the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee (SPPC) heard the attached presentation from the Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer, and the Manager, Development Finance, and verbal delegations from Jim Kennedy, President, London Development Institute, and Sandy Levin, 59 Longbow Road, with respect to this matter; it being further noted that the SPPC also received a written communication from Jim Kennedy, President, London Development Institute, with respect to this matter.”

7.   Development Charges

Policy Review - UWRF Framework and Timing of DC Payment - SWM Component

That the following recommendation BE REFERRED back to staff for further dialogue and report back at the June 10, 2013 meeting of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee:   “That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, with the concurrence of the Managing Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer and the Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services and Chief Building Official, the following policy amendments with respect to the City’s Urban Works Reserve Fund (UWRF) and the future funding of Storm Water Management Facilities (SWMs) BE APPROVED IN PRINCIPLE as part of the 2014 DC By-law, subject to further dialogue with external stakeholders with respect to:   -         details of implementation, including the change to the number of SWMs affected and their costs, all of which would ultimately be included in the Background Study in any event; -         how the existing financial obligations of the UWRF (“Transition payments”) will be met through the implementation of the new policy;   -         assurance that the policies being introduced are not intended to be used to unduly delay approvals for land development by staff or by Council; it being noted that the existing Growth Management Implementation Strategy is the mechanism which  facilitates the sufficient supply of serviceable land, and which must be respected following its implementation;   -         an update of Stormwater Management Facility design standards; and   -         details regarding the impact of changing the timing of payment of the SWM component of the DC from building permit to subdivision agreement:   a)            funding of all future SWM works be consolidated under the City Services Reserve Fund (CSRF) – SWM component; it being noted that suitable transitional measures associated with existing claims and development applications involving Urban Works Reserve Funded (UWRF) Storm Water Management Facilities (SWMF) in progress will be in the draft 2014 Development Charges DC By-law; it being further noted that the City’s policy regarding Private Permanent Stormwater Servicing is expected to reduce the number and size of ponds that will be constructed in the future;   b)            revised timing of collection of the SWM component of the DC charge under Section 26 of the Development Charges Act be incorporated in the next DC Rate By-law; it being noted that this will result in DC charge collections for this component being made at time of entering the agreement of subdivision or consent rather than from collection at building permit stage;   c)            new processes for Design and Construction of Storm Water Management Facilities (SWMF’s), as generally summarized in Appendix D be implemented as appended to the staff report dated May 13, 2013;   d)            the Civic Administration be directed to further develop the procedures governing construction of infrastructure undertaken through development agreements, summarized in draft form in Appendix E as appended to the staff report dated May 13, 2013;   e)            the Civic Administration be directed to prepare by-law amendments and further refine administrative processes necessary to effect the above-noted changes coincident with the effective date of the 2014 DC By-law; and   f)             comments received from the London Development Institute, the Urban League and Lyn Townsend, LLB, with respect to the above-noted policy amendments as Appendix G, appended to the staff report dated May 13, 2013 be received for information;   it being noted that the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee (SPPC) heard the attached presentation from the Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer, and the Manager, Development Finance, and verbal delegations from Jim Kennedy, President, London Development Institute, and Sandy Levin, 59 Longbow Road, with respect to this matter; it being further noted that the SPPC also received a written communication from Jim Kennedy, President, London Development Institute, with respect to this matter.”

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor D.G. Henderson

Approve progress on the in camera matters.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

8.   London Transit -

2012 Annual Report

That the communication dated May 1 2012, with respect to the attached London Transit Service 2012 Annual Report, from L. Ducharme, General Manager, London Transit Commission, BE RECEIVED for information; it being noted that the Civic Works Committee received the attached presentation from Mr. L. Ducharme, with respect to this matter. (2013-C03D)

9.   Bruce Street and

Elmwood Avenue

That the communication dated April 5, 2013, from Councillor D. Brown, with respect to traffic flow on Bruce Street and Elmwood Avenue, BE REFERRED to staff for a report back to the Civic Works Committee.   (2013-T04)

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen

Seconded by Councillor B. Polhill

Amend the criteria attached to part 6, “Criteria For the on-street Boulevard Cafe Program:” in part j) by adding the words “along Dundas Street within”, following the words “York Street”.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen

Seconded by Councillor P. Hubert

Approve clause 6, as amended.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor J.B. Swan

Approve clauses 1 to 5, excluding clause 2

10.   Property located at

433 Hyde Park Road

That, on the recommendation of the Manager, Development Services and Planning Liaison, the following actions be taken with respect to the Site Plan approval application by 1873739 Ontario Ltd. relating to the property located at 433 Hyde Park Road:   a)          the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that, at the public meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee held with respect to this matter, issues were raised with respect to the following:   i)          landscaping; ii)          traffic and pedestrian safety; iii)         loss of privacy; iv)        loss of wildlife habitat; v)         insufficient parking; and, vi)        the height of the buildings;   b)         the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council supports the granting of approval of the site plan application, as appended to the staff report dated May 7, 2013, for two (2) townhouse buildings containing nine (9) residential units in total, proposed at 433 Hyde Park Road; and,   c)         the financing for the project BE APPROVED in accordance with the “Estimated Claims and Revenues Report” provided as Appendix “A” to the associated staff report, dated May 7, 2013;   it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals made oral submissions in connection therewith:   -                    Barry McCarthy, #21 – 455 Hyde Park Road – indicating that many of the concerns that were outlined in the staff presentation are concerns that he has; indicating that he has three main issues; advising that he is speaking on behalf of those that are not able to speak, that being the wildlife; noting that there is a wide variety of species living in the area, from the smallest animal to deer; advising that it bothers him that there is no consideration given to preserving the animals habitat; indicating that in 1997, a by-law was adopted relating to maintaining the heights of development within residential areas; expressing concern with the development of a two-storey development in a single storey area; noting that this area of Hyde Park Road is single storey buildings; advising that this is really poor aesthetically; advising that the area consists mostly of seniors; noting that a two-storey development is not compatible with seniors who have problems with stairs; indicating that the most important concern to him is the visual access of the proposed two-storey dwellings into his property; noting that there is not much distance between his property and the proposed properties; also noting that they will have access to his bedroom; further noting that when he is sitting on his deck, he will have the same visual access to their bedroom; advising that young trees are generally planted and that, by the time they are old enough to block visual access, he will not be around; indicating that canopy trees do not have leaves for a long time and that visual access will exist for 6 – 8 months; indicating that there is not enough parking on the west side of Hyde Park Road, as there are ball and soccer games held in the park; indicating that there is not enough parking in the park for parents and they park along Hyde Park Road; expressing concern that a child may dart between parked cars and into traffic; indicating that there is no additional parking proposed with this application; noting that he does not advocate that it be proposed; and advising that, if someone in the new development has more than a couple of guests, those cars will have to be parked on Hyde Park Road as well. -                    Barbara Richardson, 1128 Mahogany Road -  indicating that the development is literally in her backyard; reiterating the comments previously mentioned; indicating that it is a beautiful site with deer and a variety of animals; noting that it is a thoroughly forested area; advising that it is heartbreaking to see more development; indicating that she participated in the zoning debates that happened 10 years ago; advising that, at that time, the residents were assured that only one-floor residences would be built; advising that two-storey buildings are out of character with entire area on Hyde Park Road; expressing concern with the area in general and her privacy and safety; advising that the road into the site will be driving into her windows; noting that a fence has not been proposed; indicating that this will devalue her property, both financially and in her ability to enjoy her property; expressing concern about the swimming pool and the impact of noise potentially coming from the pool; indicating that she previously made a submission; and advising that she would like to reiterate the points made by the previous speaker as it is very risky to put such buildings in this area. -                    Michelle Doornbosch, Zelinka Priamo Ltd., on behalf of the applicant – providing background on the zoning; noting that the site plan her firm has submitted complies with the current zoning regulations; advising that in 2004, site specific zoning was given to the proposed properties and the properties along Mahogany Road, to ensure that they are sympathetic to the existing residential properties to the west along Mahogany Road; advising that there is an increased rear yard setback and an increased landscaped open space; noting that they have met these requirements; advising that there is a maximum height of 7 metres for these properties and they comply with the maximum height restriction; indicating that there is a balance between the existing condominiums on Hyde Park Road and the existing two storey single family residences along Mahogany Road; and indicating that, along the easterly property line, the applicant will build a 1.8 m board fence as well as installing new landscaping that staff recommended.     (2013-D11)

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

11.   Property located at

425 Wharncliffe Road South

At 5:57 PM, His Worship the Mayor resumes the Chair, and Councillor P. Hubert takes his seat at the Council Board.

Moved by Councillor D. Brown

Seconded by Councillor N. Branscombe

Approve that part b) of clause 11 be amended to read as follows:   “b)       the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the north and south fences are to be constructed of wrought iron, at a height of 1.8m, the existing interior chain link fence is to be retained, the clear throat access is to be applied at a minimum of 6 metres, and decorative stones are to be permitted instead of armour stone;”

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor D. Brown

Seconded by Councillor N. Branscombe

Approve clause 11, as amended, excluding part b).

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor D. Brown

Seconded by Councillor N. Branscombe

Approve clause 11 b), as amended.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

12.   Properties located

at 3924 and 4128 Colonel Talbot Road (39T-12503/OZ-8052)

That, on the recommendation of the Manager of Development Services and Planning Liaison, the following actions be taken with respect to the appeals by Colonel Talbot Developments Inc., on the neglect by the Municipal Council to make a decision on the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications and the failure of the Approval Authority to make a decision on an application for subdivision approval concerning lands located at 3924 and 4138 Colonel Talbot Road:   a)         the Ontario Municipal Board BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council has reviewed the appeals and determined that a decision to approve the Official Plan amendment, Zoning By-law amendment and draft plan of subdivision applications, at this time, would be premature, and would not be in the public interest for the following reasons:   i)          the subject lands are located within the area affected by the Southwest Area Plan (OPA 541), which is currently under appeal.  Land uses, road alignments and conditions of draft approval cannot be finalized for this plan of subdivision until such time as the land use policies and servicing requirements for the Southwest Area Plan are confirmed;   ii)         conditions of draft approval cannot be formulated for sanitary servicing since there is no sanitary servicing available to service the proposed plan of subdivision.  The Development Charge By-law (By-law C.P.-1473-212) and Growth Management Implementation Strategy, that are currently in effect, do not provide for financing to service the required sanitary works within the 20 year planning period;   iii)         conditions of draft approval cannot be formulated for stormwater management because a storm/drainage and stormwater management (SWM) servicing Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) is required prior to consideration of this application, to confirm stormwater management requirements for this development and external lands. The Development Charge By-law (By-law C.P.-1473-212) and Growth Management Implementation Strategy, that are currently in effect, do not provide for financing to service the required storm/drainage and SWM works within the 20 year planning period;   iv)        collector road alignments and conditions of draft approval cannot be finalized for the proposed plan of subdivision until such time as the connecting alignments in the Southwest Area Plan have been confirmed. The collector road alignments in the proposed plan of subdivision are inconsistent with the collector road alignments in the Southwest Area Plan and the Traffic Impact Statement submitted with the revised plan of subdivision application, does not satisfy requirements in the Official Plan Traffic Assessment Guidelines;   v)         the proposed plan of subdivision is not consistent with the Natural Heritage policies in Section 15 of the Official Plan or the Natural Heritage features delineated in the Southwest Area Plan.  The Subject Lands Status Report/Scoped EIS, submitted with the revised application, has not been prepared in accordance with the requirements in Section 15.5 of the Official Plan. Also, the proposed plan of subdivision does not include the pathway corridor alignments as identified in the Bicycle Master Plan; and,   vi)        based on the deficiencies identified with the proposed plan of subdivision, and the current status of the Southwest Area Plan, the proposed plan of subdivision is not consistent with the provisions in Section 1.6 and 2.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement, and Section 2 of the Planning Act;   b)         the City Solicitor and Managing Director of Development & Compliance Services and Chief Building Official BE DIRECTED to provide legal and planning representation at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to support the position of Municipal Council; and,   c)            the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to continue discussions with the applicant relating to the application for draft plan of subdivision approval concerning lands located at 3924 and 4138 Colonel Talbot Road;   it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals made oral submissions in connection therewith:   -                     Steve Stapleton, Auburn Developments, applicant – see attached presentation. -                     Carol Wiebe, MHBC Planning Urban Design and Landscape Architecture, on behalf of York Developments – see attached presentation.  (2013-L01)

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

13.   Properties located

at 1057, 1059 and 1061 Richmond Street (Z-8106)

16.   Properties located

at 1057, 1059 and 1061 Richmond Street

That the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council supports the rights-in, rights-out access onto Richmond Street and the denial of access to the laneway, as it relates to the properties located at 1057, 1059 and 1061 Richmond Street.

Moved by Councillor M. Brown

Seconded by Councillor S. Orser

Approve that clauses 13 and 16 BE REFERRED back to staff to work with the applicant to address the following matters:   a)         prohibiting access to the site from the laneway; b)         provision for all-way turns into and out of the site; c)         removal of uses from the base Neighbourhood Facility Zone that are not desired by the applicant; d)         exploration of opportunities to reduce density and bedrooms on the site, with consideration given to compatible density suggestions; and e)         revision of the urban design brief to address the revised project proposal.

At 6:25 PM, His Worship the Mayor places Councillor P. Hubert in the Chair, and takes a seat at the Council board.

At 6:31 PM His Worship the Mayor resumes the Chair, and Councillor P. Hubert takes his seat at the Council board.

Moved by Councillor N. Branscombe

Seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan

Approve the motion to refer be Amended in part d) by deleting the words “compatible density suggestions” and by replacing them with the words “a maximum density of 45 units per hectare, that is compatible and reflective of the character of the existing neighbourhood”.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

14.   Blackfriars/Petersville

Neighbourhood Planning Options

That, the following actions be taken with respect to the Blackfriars/Petersville neighbourhood:   a)         the report, dated May 7, 2013, from the Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Solicitor, relating to the planning options for the Blackfriars/Petersville neighbourhood BE RECEIVED;   b)         the London Advisory Committee on Heritage BE REQUESTED to consider the Blackfriars/Petersville neighbourhood as the next potential Heritage Conservation District on the list of potential Heritage Conservation Districts as maintained by the London Advisory Committee on Heritage;    c)         the London Advisory Committee on Heritage BE REQUESTED to recommend the hiring of a Consultant to prepare a study for the Blackfriars/Petersville Neighbourhood, generally bounded by the Canadian Pacific Railway to the north, the Thames River to the east and south and the floodplain boundary to the west, and as shown on Schedule “A” as appended to the staff report dated May 7, 2013, to determine whether areas within the Blackfriars/Petersville area meet the Official Plan criteria and the Ontario Heritage Act criteria with respect to the creation of a heritage conservation district under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act;   d)         the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to undertake a concurrent study to consider a City initiated Zoning By-law Amendment to rezone the subject area from a Residential R2 zone to a Residential R1 Zone;   it being noted that staff will report back regarding possible changes to the staff workplan that may be required to undertake the zoning study identified above;    e)         that NO ACTION be taken with respect to an Interim Control By-law for the Blackfriars/Petersville area;   f)         the proposed draft by-law, as appended to the staff report dated May 7, 2013, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on May 14, 2013, for the purpose of revoking the delegated authority for site plan approval for the property located at 108 Wilson Avenue; and,   g)         a special meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee BE HELD on Tuesday, May 7, 2013 at 2:30 PM to receive advice from the London Advisory Committee on Heritage, the Managing Director of Planning and City Planner and the Managing Director of Corporate Services and City Solicitor, with respect to the potential designation of the Blackfriars/ Petersville area as a heritage conservation study area by by-law, pursuant to Section 40.1(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act; it being pointed out that the Planning and Environment Committee heard verbal presentations from the Manager, Land Use Planning Policy, the Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Solicitor, the Manager, Development Services & Planning Liaison and the attached presentation from K. Bice, 2 Leslie Street, on behalf of the Blackfriars community, with respect to this matter.   (2013-R01)

15.   Hazelden Park

That the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to review  the amount of parking in Hazelden Park and look for potential opportunities to expand the existing parking lot; it being noted that cars are parking along Hyde Park Road during ball games and soccer games.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor M. Brown

Seconded by Councillor J.L. Baechler

Recess.   Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor D. Brown

Approve clauses 1 to 7.

X.   DEFERRED

MATTERS

XI.   ENQUIRIES

XII.   EMERGENT

MOTIONS

XIII.   BY-LAWS

BY-LAWS TO BE READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME:

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen

Approve Introduction and 1st Reading of Bill Nos. 211 to 232.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Seconded by Councillor D. Brown

Approve 2nd Reading of Bill Nos. 211 to 232.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Seconded by Councillor S. Orser

Approve 3rd Reading and Enactment of Bill Nos. 211 to 232.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Seconded by Councillor P. Hubert

Approve Introduction and 1st Reading of Bill No. 233.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor H.L. Usher

Seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen

Approve 2nd Reading of Bill No.  233, with the corrected typographical error.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen

Approve 3rd Reading and Enactment of Bill No. 233, with the corrected typographical error.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

XIV.   ADJOURNMENT

Motion Passed

Motion Passed