Open Council

The 6th Meeting of the Civic Works Committee

Open Council

The 6th Meeting of the Civic Works Committee

April 9, 2024, at 9:30 AM

Original link

The meeting was called to order at 9:31 AM.

1.   Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest

That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary interests were disclosed.

2.   Consent

Moved by S. Franke

Seconded by D. Ferreira

That Items 2.1 to 2.6 BE APPROVED.

Motion Passed (5 to 0)

2.1   4th Report of the Integrated Transportation Community Advisory Committee

2024-03-20 ITCAC Report

Moved by S. Franke

Seconded by D. Ferreira

That the following actions be taken with respect to the 4th Report of the Integrated Transportation Community Advisory Committee, from the meeting held on March 20, 2024:

a)    permission BE GRANTED by Municipal Council for the members of the Integrated Transportation Community Advisory Committee to tour the Transportation Management Centre; and,

b)    clauses 1.1, 2.1, 3.1 and 6.1 BE RECEIVED.

Motion Passed

2.2   Contract Award RFT-2024-022 - Springbank Reservoir 2 Replacement and Expansion

2024-04-09 SR RFT-2024-022 - Springbank Reservoir 2 Replacement and Expansion - Part 1

2024-04-09 SR RFT-2024-022 - Springbank Reservoir 2 Replacement and Expansion - Part 2

2024-04-09 SR RFT-2024-022 - Springbank Reservoir 2 Replacement and Expansion - Part 3

Moved by S. Franke

Seconded by D. Ferreira

That on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment and Infrastructure, the following actions be taken with respect to the staff report, dated April 9, 2024, related to Contract Award RFT-2024-022 Springbank Reservoir 2 Replacement and Expansion:

a)    The bid submitted by Stone Town Construction Limited at its tendered price of $43,032,902.00 (excluding HST) BE ACCEPTED; it being noted that the bid submitted by Stone Town Construction Limited was the lowest of two bids received and meets the City’s specifications and requirements in all areas;

b)    Aecom Canada Ltd., BE AUTHORIZED to carry out the resident inspection and contract administration for the Springbank Reservoir 2 Replacement and Expansion project in accordance with the estimate, on file, at an upset amount of $3,769,075.00, including 10% contingency, excluding HST, in accordance with Section 15.2 (g) of the City of London’s Procurement of Goods and Services Policy;

c)    the financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing Report, as appended to the above-noted staff report;

d)    the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in connection with this project;

e)    the approval given, herein, BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal contract or issuing a purchase order for the material to be supplied and the work to be done, relating to this project (RFT-2024-022); and,

f)    the Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations. (2024-F18)

Motion Passed

2.3   Appointment of Consulting Engineers for the Infrastructure Renewal Program

2024-04-09 SR Appt of Consulting Engineers for the Infrastructure Renewal Program - Part 1

2024-04-09 SR Appt of Consulting Engineers for the Infrastructure Renewal Program - Part 2

2024-04-09 SR Appt of Consulting Engineers for the Infrastructure Renewal Program - Part 3

2024-04-09 SR Appt of Consulting Engineers for the Infrastructure Renewal Program - Part 4

Moved by S. Franke

Seconded by D. Ferreira

That on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment and Infrastructure, the following actions be taken with respect to the staff report, dated April 9, 2024, related to the Appointment of Consulting Engineers for the Infrastructure Renewal Program:

a)     the following consulting engineers BE APPOINTED to carry out consulting services for the identified Infrastructure Renewal Program funded projects, at the upset amounts identified below, in accordance with the estimate on file, and in accordance with Section 15.2(e) of the City of London’s Procurement of Goods and Services Policy:

i)    Spriet Associates London Limited BE APPOINTED consulting engineers to complete the pre-design, and detailed design of Contract 5 – Craig Street from Ridout Street to Wortley Road, reconstruction, in the total amount of $182,579.10, including contingency, (excluding HST);

ii)    GM BluePlan Engineering Limited BE APPOINTED consulting engineers to complete the pre-design, and detailed design of Contract 6 – Evangeline Street from Second Street to Third Street, and Third Street from Dundas Street to Culver Drive, reconstruction, in the total amount of $380,677.00, including contingency, (excluding HST);

iii)    Archibald, Gray & McKay Engineering Ltd. BE APPOINTED consulting engineers to complete the pre-design and detailed design of Contract 8 – Central Avenue, from Elizabeth Street to Ontario Street, reconstruction, in the total amount of $292,600.00, including contingency, (excluding HST);

iv)    Dillon Consulting Limited BE APPOINTED consulting engineers to complete the pre-design and detailed design of Contract 9 – Rectory Street, from Little Simcoe Street to Florence Street, reconstruction, in the total amount of $249,689.55,including contingency, (excluding HST);

b)    the financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing Report, as appended to the above-noted staff report;

c)    the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in connection with this project;

d)    the approval given, herein, BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal contract; and,

e)     the Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations. (2024-F18)

Motion Passed

2.4   Single Source - Adelaide Wastewater Treatment Plant Clarifier Drive Replacement

2024-04-09 SR Adelaide Wastewater Treatment Plant Clarifier - Part 1

2024-04-09 SR Adelaide Wastewater Treatment Plant Clarifier - Part 2

Moved by S. Franke

Seconded by D. Ferreira

That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment and Infrastructure, the following actions be taken with respect to the staff report, dated April 9, 2024, related to a Single Source for the Adelaide Wastewater Treatment Plant Clarifier Drive Replacement:

a)    the contract for supply and delivery BE AWARDED to Evoqua Water Technologies in the amount of $60,000.00 (excluding HST) as a single source award in accordance with Article 14.4.d of the Procurement of Goods and Services Policy;

b)    the financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing Report, as appended to the above-noted staff report;

c)    the Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations; and,

d)    the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in connection with this project. (2024-F18)

Motion Passed

2.5   Adelaide Street North Bridge over the Thames River Rehabilitation - Detail Design and Tendering Appointment of Consultant Engineer

2024-04-09 SR Adelaide Street North Bridge - Part 1

2024-04-09 SR Adelaide Street North Bridge - Part 2

Moved by S. Franke

Seconded by D. Ferreira

That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment and Infrastructure, the following actions be taken with respect to the staff report, dated April 9, 2024, related to the Adelaide Street North Bridge over the Thames River Rehabilitation Detail Design and Tendering Appointment of Consulting Engineer:

a)    Dillon Consulting Limited BE AUTHORIZED to carry out the detailed design and tendering in the amount of $250,350 (excluding HST) in accordance with Section 15.2 (g) of the Procurement of Goods and Services Policy;

b)    the financing for this contract amendment BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing Report, as appended to the above-noted staff report;

c)    the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in connection with this contract; and,

d)    the Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations. (2024-F18)

Motion Passed

2.6   Holtby Municipal Drain Petition and Request for Maintenance and Consultant Appointment

2024-04-09 SR Holtby Municipal Drain - Part 1

2024-04-09 SR Holtby Municipal Drain - Part 2

2024-04-09 SR Holtby Municipal Drain - Part 3

Moved by S. Franke

Seconded by D. Ferreira

That on the recommendation of Deputy City Manager, Environment and Infrastructure, the following actions be taken with respect to the staff report, dated April 9, 2024, related to the Holtby Municipal Drain Petition and Request for Maintenance and Consultant Appointment:

a)    the petition for a New Branch and a Request for a Major Improvement to the Holtby Municipal Drain located in the area of Highbury and Glanworth Drive to benefit the drainage of 1510 Glanworth Drive, Township of Westminster BE ACCEPTED by the Council of The Corporation of the City of London under section 4 and 78 of the Drainage Act, and,

b)    Spriet Associates London Limited BE APPOINTED under section 4 and 78 of the Drainage Act.  (2024-E09)

Motion Passed

3.   Scheduled Items

None.

4.   Items for Direction

None.

5.   Deferred Matters/Additional Business

5.1   Deferred Matters List

CWC Deferred Matters List - as at March 15, 2024

Moved by S. Franke

Seconded by D. Ferreira

That the Civic Works Committee Deferred Matters List, as at March 15, 2024, BE RECEIVED.

Motion Passed (5 to 0)

6.   Adjournment

The meeting adjourned at 9:58 AM.

Full Transcript

Transcript provided by Lillian Skinner’s London Council Archive. Note: This is an automated speech-to-text transcript and may contain errors. Speaker names are not identified.

View full transcript (42 minutes)

[15:53] Good morning everyone and welcome to the six meeting of Civic Works Committee. Please check the city website for additional meeting detail information. Meetings can be viewed via live streaming on YouTube and the city website. The city of London is situated on the traditional lands of the Anishinaabe, the La Penaewalk and the Adewandrin. We honor and respect the history, languages and culture of the diverse indigenous people who call this territory home. The city of London is currently home to many first nations, Métis and Inuit today. As representatives of the people of the city of London, we are grateful to have the opportunity to work and live in this territory. The city of London is committed to making every effort to provide alternate formats and communication, supports for meetings upon request to make a request specific to the submitting. Please contact cwc@london.ca or 519-661-2489 extension 2425. Moving on. Any disclosures of community interest? I see none. It’s good to see all our committee members here in the chambers. Moving on to consent items. We have 2.1 to 2.6. Is there any interest of it having any of them pulled?

[17:35] I see none. And I guess just to start it off, I’d like to get a motion to put the consent items on the floor for discussion. Councillor Frank and Councillor Ferrera. Second. And with that, I’d like to go to committee members. Any questions? Comments? Maybe just to start it off, I do want to bring to everyone’s attention the fourth report of the Integrated Transportation Community Advisory Committee. There is a request there for a tour of the Transportation Management Center and looking for committee members to receive that report. Councillor Ferrera.

[18:27] Thank you, Chair. I was going to make a comment on the reservoir. I can hold off and just see the comments for the committee or the advisory committee first, if anybody wants to comment on that. I see none. You can proceed. Thanks, Chair. So looking at this report, great report. The whole agenda, I guess, I appreciated. But I did want to ask some questions about the reservoir. I guess I only really have one that I’m looking at here. And I just wanted to ask, while the reservoir is down for construction, what kind of risk would the city be facing in an event that we might need the capacity of that reservoir while it’s not available? I’ll go to staff. Thank you through the chair. So we do have sufficient capacity in the other two reservoirs. So we have three reservoirs at the top of the hill there. We also have the Arbor Reservoir. So between those, we do have sufficient capacity.

[19:26] You might be aware that actually over the past few years, we’ve had one of the other reservoirs out at each time as well, as we did rehab work on reservoir one and also on three last year that’s coming to a close. So those will be brought back online before this one is taken out of service for this work. Councillor? Thank you for that answer. I just was wondering about that. That would be the only question I have for the reservoir. So I’ll yield to other committee members and possibly gather my questions for some other items on the agenda. Any other questions from committee members on 2.2? For now, we might as well stay with those questions. I see none. If committee members will allow me from the chair, I do have a question on the work that’s already happened and mainly the trees that have been taken down. And being removed, I understand some we were able to transplant. But there’s a number of plantings, 972 trees to be planted.

[20:40] And I would like to have a better understanding because it was a concern from the community about losing these trees. But what is the plan for the number of trees going forward? Thank you through the chair. So we will have more information coming forward on the exact timing and locations of those plantings at this time that it is still early stages. So through this report, we are providing $563,000 to our partners in forestry who are putting together that plan for sites for that planting because they don’t all fit on within the reservoir site and the nature of those plantings. So they will be looking at the timing and the locations that are best for those planting needs for the trees, survival, et cetera.

[21:31] They will also be looking at how closely they can put them to the project site so that we’re maintaining or we’re offsetting that loss of canopy and habitat within the general area of the project. So I don’t have specific answers on that timing at this point, but we will have that going forward at future date. Thank you for that information. I think it’s important that there’s a plan in place and I really appreciate the fact that we still have some plans to work on, but there they will be ongoing. Thank you.

[22:05] Councillor Trussell. Thank you through the chair. The removal of trees and not replacing them on site or near the site remains an issue that cuts across many different projects that remains a concern of the public, my creek, other ones. And I appreciate what you just said that more information will come forward. How will that be communicated to the public and how will they be able to respond to it?

[22:41] So through the chair we typically publish this information through the Get Involved site. There is still an active page on Get Involved for this project and we can provide updates through that. Do people have to sort of go to the Get Involved site every week just to see if something’s there or will something be pushed out? So through the chair we do also have a contact list of people who have signed up for updates on that project so we can also push notices out through that.

[23:19] Others who are not on the update list yet who might be interested. So I would recommend if they are interested in that project that they sign up for those updates or they check on the Get Involved site, that would be their best way of ensuring that they have up-to-date information. Councillor. I guess that’s it. I mean, I just think it needs to be a better way to sort of push information out to people without making them initiate it. I just would much rather see this be a little more transparent.

[23:57] And just as a follow-up, if we are approached from the community on wanting to get more information on how these trees are going to be replaced, would it also be suggested that they could reach out to forestry as well? Through the chair, I would suggest going through the project manager and through the contact information that we have on the Get Involved site just to make sure that all information is going through the one point of contact. It does make some of those communications a little bit more streamlined and consistent and easier.

[24:32] But certainly our staff and project managers will be working closely with forestry and will be working together to provide that information. As a follow-up to Councillor Truss, I am thinking that we could also, when information becomes available on this plan and so on, we can push that out through social media as well, that there is an update on the page. So as long as they are watching some source of information or another, hopefully we can get that out. Thank you for that. Yeah, that’s great idea. Thank you for that as well. Moving on now to 2.3. I know there’s a question from a committee member. This is the appointment of consulting engineers for the infrastructure renewal program. Councillor Pribble.

[25:19] Thank you, Mr. Chair, to the staff. I will start on page 12, by the way, it does say that this is the first round on infrastructure renewal program. But last meeting, we have also approved already 2nd Street and St. Leonard Street. So the previous ones, would they be part of this first? Because the reason why I’m asking is that it says two more rounds, but I’m just wondering if the two rounds will be together and if there are more than just these two rounds because the 2nd Street and Leonard’s, I believe it will be probably part of this one.

[25:57] So through the consultant awards that we did at the last meeting were for resident construction and contract administration for projects that were under design last year. So when we say in this report that this is the first round, it’s the first round of consultant appointments for working on design work this year. So these projects that this design work is for will be actually constructed in 2025. So the infrastructure renewal program has a number of accounts that a lot of projects draw funds from, our entire program draws funds. So you see a number of different awards out of those accounts. Hence, some of the why you see things being awarded in the previous report for construction for this year and then consulting this time around.

[26:50] Okay, thank you for that answer and follow up. When I look at the current proposal of the four contracts and there are kind of, it describes that it’s kind of the identical in terms of the engineering, pre-design and detailed design. If I look at the four and if I divide it by the meters, there’s quite a bit of difference for the cost. Is there a particular, because again, not being an expert, I would say per meter would be a good designation kind of to get the amount pretty similar, but there is kind of, I didn’t do it roughly 40% differences among some. So can you please explain that to me? Thank you.

[27:31] Thank you through the chair. So this really comes down to the details of the design work needed for each of the sites. So there may be very different site conditions that are known on each of the projects. There might be a slight difference in the infrastructure that is being replaced or going into it. So we would expect to see some variation depending on the type of project. And all of these projects have been reviewed and are within the costs that we would expect for them. Okay, thank you and follow up on the, if we go to the appendix A and I just want to understand this part, because there are three accounts and the two years accounts and the EW account.

[28:13] And last meeting we had, in terms of the construction, there were zero costs. Then the meeting came, today’s meeting, now we have construction costs in a few million dollars. How did it happen from last time? And where did these construction happen? Did they already happen? Is this a commitment? Thank you. Thank you through the chair. So as I mentioned, these projects or these account numbers are used for a variety of construction projects. So some of these, many of them actually come in under that three million dollar mark that we can do administrative awards for. So they don’t necessarily come through committee. So these will be projected. Now I would need a little more time to look up exactly which ones have been awarded. But these will be projects that have been awarded, had the tenders closed and been awarded administratively.

[29:00] Okay, thank you for that. And this area or these roads, when I looked at the map, they are very close to the projection timelines of our RT, our RT, BRT. How do we coordinate with the transportation? Because again, it’s all in the similar area. Is there going to be a coordination? Is it really that the timing of these streets is so urgent that we are kind of doing it in the same era of the city? Thank you.

[29:39] Sure. Thank you through the chair. So we do work with construction coordinating committee to look at how the projects interact with each other and if those interactions can be managed, sometimes they do need to be done in fairly close timing because of the underground infrastructure and making those connections and so on. But we do have a committee with people from each of the areas, including directors that do look at this to make those decisions. Councillor? Thank you, Phillip. Do we have any, because again, coordination, same-coming this and certainly not the best for traffic, not the best for Londoners, but because we are doing this kind of together in the same. Do we have certain cost savings or is there certain effectiveness efficiency in doing it kind of in the same era of similar time?

[30:28] Through the chair, sometimes it depends on the nature of the project and exactly how they interact, but there are certainly times that we would do this. The 3rd Street, for example, so that’s the Pottersburg Creek Sanitary Trunks sewer. So that’s work that’s continuing from one end to the other. So it’s got a timeline as well. And then we would be making those tie-ins on Dundas. So all those separate projects, we certainly look at how they interact and to get that best value where we can. Okay, and Dior, thank you. I don’t have no more questions to 2.3. Thank you. Thank you, Councillor Pribble. We have the remaining items, consent items on the floor. Councillor Ferrera. Thanks, Chair. This one has to do with the Adelaide Wastewater Treatment Plant Clarifier Drive Replacement. I guess, first, would it be possible staff could give us just a summary, brief summary of the drive replacement and what that part is and how it works and what kind of material comes out of that, just like the process of that. Would that be a possibility? So through the chair, I’m actually going to pass that one to Mr. Odekirk because once we get into the details of how our treatment plants work, I am not the right person. Of course, through the chair. Yeah, so our clarifiers are the final stage. In this case, the secondary clarifier is the final stage of our treatment.

[31:56] It’s a large circular tank and it has a mechanism within it. There’s a central pillar and then an arm that swings around and sweeps off anything else that’s remaining in the water. This unit that we’re replacing is actually the central drive unit. So the part that actually rotates that arm. It needs to be replaced. That mechanism is over 20 years old, probably approaching 30 years old. And it’s just reached its end of life. And so in order to replace it, we have to replace like for like. And in this case, that has to go back to the original manufacturer. Thank you for that. So at least my next question, I guess, with the replacement.

[32:36] I did see a line in this report where it says, “Many of the components of the Adelaide Wastewater Treatment Plan are aging. So I just want to know what would we expect in the future for replacements for the, I guess, the entire wastewater treatment plan?” Yeah, so through the chair, we try to stay ahead of these things with preventive maintenance programs. And typically, we’re able to replace little pieces of it, replacing seals, bearings, those types of things. We can do a lot of that work on our own. But there will be times when the overall mechanism or the overall component fails. And we have to replace those. So we try to limit the number of times that those occur. And we keep track of how they’re progressing and they’re aging. And if we can stay ahead of it, that’s great. The long-term plans for Adelaide with under our DMAF project, we’re also coordinating the replacement or the restoration of Section 1, which is going to gain us a little more treatment capacity there and a little more buffer to get us through a long-term upgrade in about 20 years. And so once we hit that point, we’ll be looking at wholesale changes of everything. So our goal will be to try to extend the life of the existing infrastructure to get us through to that point.

[33:44] Thank you for that. Okay. I can move on to, I guess, the next item. I got a question for the Adelaide Street Bridge work that we’re doing with connecting the Thames Valley Parkway with Stony Creek. So I just wanted to know, I do see a note here that the pathway connection along the bridge will see the removal and replacement of the west side sidewalk with a new pathway. So I just wanted to know with that removal, I do believe we have a sidewalk on the east side, but I just wanted to know if I could get a little bit more information with respect to that. Mr. McRae? Through the chair.

[34:30] Yes, the pathway project proposes a pathway across the west side of the bridge. So the plan would be to replace the existing, which is currently a sidewalk and a bike lane with a combined multi-use path. So it would accommodate all active transportation users, so both cyclists and pedestrians to the required width that fits within the rest of the pathway. Councillor? I think I appreciate that. Yeah, so pathway is going to be accessible to all kind of modes. I guess active modes of transportation.

[35:13] That would be the only questions I have for that. I guess I’ll move us on to the last item with the hot, the Holtby Municipal Drain petition. I was wondering if we could just get a little more information on that. I’m not reading through the report, the drain itself. I just wanted to know, what does that mean? Am I expecting like an actual drain or is there some grading of the area? I was wondering if you could give a little bit of expansion on that part. Thanks for that, Councillor. I think we’re starting to become drain experts here, but I will go to staff for sure.

[35:48] Thank you through the chair. Yes, we have had a number of drainage reports lately, which so I’m learning a lot more about them in the last little while as two. So basically we had a petition come in to improve the drainage in this area and it would be related to municipal drain so the consultant would look at all the drainage in the area going to it and it needed works to improve the overall drainage and reinstate the drain to its intended function. Councillor. That’s all my questions. Thank you. And just as a quick follow-up, this was created, this wasn’t asked from the community and there was a petition. We are to approve it and the community pays the cost as well. So lots of interesting information as we make decisions on municipal drains here. So with that, I see no further questions from committee members. We do have Councillor Pribble.

[36:49] Thank you. Just a comment on 2.5 and the TVP last week, our staff organized a public meeting at one of the schools and it was well attended and overall it has been a really positive overall it has been a positive response from the public and I’m very excited about this project and hopefully looking forward to getting it done soon. Thank you very much. Thank you. We do have a motion moved and seconded and we can proceed to vote. So Pribble voting yes, closing the vote. The motion carries 5 to 0. Great. Moving along, we have scheduled items for direction. We see none.

[38:01] We do have deferred matters in additional business. We do have our deferral list, matters list. It does relate to the garbage and recycling collection and next steps as well as updates and there has been a request to see if we can move the requested reply date to Q3. I know we are going to be receiving a report, an updated report. Maybe I’ll go to Mr. Stanford just to acknowledge that. We did get an update from you as well since there were, you know, I think it’s important that community be updated but one can we expect the report moving forward and the reason for the, just the deferral to the Q3 as well. Thank you, Madam Chair. The report on the green bin, as you recall, there was a request to actually report back sooner than the end of the year so we are completing our work by the month of June. The first meeting we can get to will be July 16th for CWC. So the work will be done in June but by the time it goes through the submission process, we’re looking at July 16th. A couple of the items on the deferred matters list will be covered in that report where we can. Other items may have to be deferred and that’s why we’re asking for the Q2 to be changed to Q3. So whatever we don’t cover on July 16th, we will cover another point in the Q3 period. Thank you for that explanation. Any questions from committee members? I see none.

[39:48] I guess I do need a motion for receiving the deferral list, Councillor Frank and Councillor Ferrera and we can open up the vote. Yes, Councillor Preble has a question. I’m sorry, did I hear from the Chair to the staff? Did I hear right at certain portion to be moved to Q3? Sorry, through the Chair, as we tackle the Green Bend update report, a couple of the items there will be covered. Anything that is not covered in that Green Bend update report would be pushed a little bit later in Q3, correct? And just adding to that, we can expect a update to July 16th. No, thank you. So I understood, right, the only thing is now we are voting now, kind of just accepting this information or are we voting now extending some parts to Q3?

[40:53] I just want to know what we are kind of voting on. We are just accepting the deferral list the moment and changing into Q3 as well. Okay, so we are doing both. Sorry. So we are accepting the report, but because there’s no Q3 in this report. I’ll have the clerk speak to it. Through the Chair, the Deferred Matters list is more of an administrative document, so the update has been made to Q3 for the official Deferred Matters list on file that will show up on the next one that shows up on an agenda. We don’t need a motion for that because I can make that change administratively. Right now, we just need to receive the current one that’s on the agenda.

[41:37] So, thank you for the explanation. No more questions? If you can open up the vote. Fosing the vote, the motion carries. Five to zero. And looking for an adjournment. Councillor Frank, seconded. Bye. Councillor Pribble. We can do this as a hand vote.

[42:18] That’s carried. Have a great day, everyone.