Election Lens · Councillor Stance Profile
Jerry Pribil
Councillor, Ward 5 (2022–2026 boundaries) · Full voting record on Open Council →
2026 candidacy: Jerry Pribil does not appear on the 2026 certified list of candidates for any ward or for Mayor (list checked Aug 30, 2026). Corrine Rahman, the outgoing Ward 7 councillor, is listed as a candidate in this ward under the new boundaries. See the certified candidate list for the authoritative source.
This is a descriptive record, not an endorsement. Every pattern below is built from real recorded votes since 2023, translated from raw yea/nay into what the vote actually did (see What Council Actually Controls for how much of this any of them controls). It says nothing about a councillor’s reasons, character, or fitness for office — only how they voted. Votes with no clear direction (“unclear”) are excluded from the pattern counts but listed in their own section below for transparency. Every row links to its source: to the heading for the specific agenda item the motion belongs to (several motion parts under one item normally share that one heading — that’s how the source pages are laid out, not an error), or, where an item number is reused for two genuinely different, unrelated motions with no way to tell them apart, to the meeting page as a whole instead (the row says so when that happens).
Housing & Density
Of the 84 divided votes on this issue since 2023 that had a clear direction, this councillor has a recorded position on 59 of them (2 of these are excluded from the pattern counts — see below). The other 25: 25 were motions at a meeting where this councillor was listed as also present (no vote recorded).
increased permitted density or building height vs. reduced permitted density or building height
Of 22 divided votes since 2023 where the motion’s effect on this axis was clear, this councillor supported 19 measures that would have increased permitted density or building height; opposed 3 measures that would have increased permitted density or building height.
2 votes excluded from the pattern above: this councillor’s recorded votes within this decision pointed in different directions across its stages, so none are counted in the tallies; each is listed here:
- Nay: Would have amended the proposed Interim Control By-law to increase the gross floor area limit for Additional Residential Units from 80% to 95% of the primary dwelling’s gross floor area. — (4.1) Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor C. Rahman - Proposal to Limit Bedroom Count in Additional Residential Units (November 4, 2025, counts as against, Motion Failed (6 to 9))
- Nay: Would have amended the Additional Residential Units proposal and Interim Control By-law to decrease the gross floor area limit from 80% to 70% of the primary dwelling’s gross floor area. — (4.1) Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor C. Rahman - Proposal to Limit Bedroom Count in Additional Residential Units (November 4, 2025, counts as for, Motion Failed (2 to 13))
Show all 24 rows on this axis (22 votes behind this pattern, 2 votes excluded from it, see above) (24 rows across 21 distinct decisions — 20 behind this pattern, 1 excluded from it, see above — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-23 | Nay | Directed Civic Administration to work with the affordable-housing proponent at 1958 Duluth Crescent, Block 6 to pursue Planning Act applications increasing permitted density on the site from 71 to 107 units per hectare. | (2.7) Award of NRFP-2025-248: Municipal Land for Affordable Housing at 1958 Duluth Crescent, Block 6 (Relates to Bill No. 239) | That part c) BE APPROVED: c) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to work with the prop… | opposed a measure that would have increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (8 to 6) |
| 2026-06-08 | Nay | Approved part c) of the Duluth Crescent affordable-housing land motion, directing Civic Administration to work with the proponent to submit Planning Act applications supporting an increase in permitted density on the site from 71 to 107 units per hectare. (committee stage) | Award of NRFP-2025-248: Municipal Land for Affordable Housing at 1958 Duluth Crescent, Block 6 (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part c) BE APPROVED. | opposed a measure that would have increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (4 to 1) |
| 2026-03-03 | Yea | Approved the 550 Ridout Street North & 82-90 Kent Street rezoning application (OZ-25152) as amended, adopting Official Plan and zoning by-law amendments that permit a 30-storey apartment building on the site. | (3.5) 550 Ridout Street North & 82-90 Kent Street - OZ-25152 (Relates to Bill No. 105 and 123) | That item 10, clause 3.5, as amended, BE APPROVED. | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Rezoned 767 Fanshawe Park Road East and 679 Dunboyne Crescent from Residential R1/R5 to a higher-density Residential R8 special provision, permitting an apartment complex. | (3.4) 767 Fanshawe Park Road East and 679 Dunboyne Crescent - Z-25151 (Relates to Bill No. 82) | AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act, no f… | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Approved a zoning by-law amendment enabling redevelopment of 644-664 Southdale Road East and 821 Nadine Avenue at increased scale and intensity within the Rapid Transit Corridor Place Type. | (3.3) 644 - 664 Southdale Road East and 821 Nadine Avenue - Z-25153 (Relates to Bill No. 81) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That item 7, clause 3.3, as amended, BE APPROVED. | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Approved Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments permitting 18-storey and 16-storey residential towers with a gross density of up to 216 units per hectare at 3680 Wonderland Road South, rezoning from shopping-area commercial to residential. | (3.12) 3680 Wonderland Road - OZ-25128 (Relates to Bill No. 68 and No. 90) | Notwithstanding the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development, the follo… | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2025-11-25 | Yea | Approved an Official Plan amendment and rezoning for 3563 Bostwick Road permitting building heights up to sixteen storeys (with tiered 9- and 6-storey portions) and mixed-use/commercial uses on lands previously zoned Urban Reserve and Environmental Review. | 39T-24502 (Relates to Bill No.’s 415 and 428) | That, on the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development, the following ac… | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2025-11-04 | Nay | Would have amended the Additional Residential Units proposal and Interim Control By-law to decrease the gross floor area limit from 80% to 70% of the primary dwelling’s gross floor area. | (4.1) Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor C. Rahman - Proposal to Limit Bedroom Count in Additional Residential Units | That the motion, as amended, BE FURTHER AMENDED as follows: a) part (d) of the motion B… | opposed a measure that would have reduced permitted density or building height | Motion Failed (2 to 13) |
| 2025-11-04 | Nay | Would have amended the proposed Interim Control By-law to increase the gross floor area limit for Additional Residential Units from 80% to 95% of the primary dwelling’s gross floor area. | (4.1) Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor C. Rahman - Proposal to Limit Bedroom Count in Additional Residential Units | That the proposed Interim Control by-law BE AMENDED to increase the gross floor area (G… | opposed a measure that would have increased permitted density or building height | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2025-10-14 | Yea | Introduced by-laws amending the Official Plan and rezoning the 1511 Clarke Road property from Urban Reserve/Environmental Review to residential zones, permitting apartment buildings up to 8-10 storeys and triplexes, fourplexes, and stacked townhomes. | (3.5) 1511 Clarke Road - 39T-24505 (Relates to Bill No.’s 369 and 379) | That the motion be amended to read as follows: Notwithstanding the recommendation of th… | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2025-07-22 | Yea | Approved Official Plan and zoning amendments permitting building heights up to 16 storeys and up to 300 units per hectare at 6309 Pack Road. | OZ-25023) (Relates to Bill No.’s 286 and 302) | That, on the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development, the following ac… | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (9 to 5) |
| 2025-06-24 | Yea | Introduced Official Plan and zoning amendments permitting a 35-storey, 512-unit mixed-use apartment building at 743 Richmond Street. | (3.4) 743 Richmond Street (OZ-25048) (Relates to Bill No.’s 261 and 273) | That, on the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development, the following ac… | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (12 to 1) |
| 2025-04-22 | Yea | Approved introducing by-laws to amend the Official Plan and rezone 801 Sarnia Road from Residential R8 to Residential R9, which the record states permits residential intensification. | (3.7) 801 Sarnia Road (OZ-25017) | Notwithstanding the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development, the follo… | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Gave final approval, as amended, to rezoning 415-421 Boler Road from Residential R1 to Residential R8, while refusing the developer’s requested reduced setback/parking special provisions. | (3.4) 415-421 Boler Road (Z-9536) (Relates to Bill No. 127) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Item 8, clause 3.4, as amended, BE APPROVED. | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Approved rezoning 415-421 Boler Road from low-density Residential R1 to high-density Residential R8, while refusing the developer’s request for reduced yard setbacks, balcony projections, bicycle parking, and parking setback standards. | (3.4) 415-421 Boler Road (Z-9536) (Relates to Bill No. 127) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion be amended to with a new a) and b) to read as follows: That, on the rec… | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Would have rezoned 415-421 Boler Road from low-density Residential R1 to high-density Residential R8, permitting apartment-scale development. | (3.4) 415-421 Boler Road (Z-9536) (Relates to Bill No. 127) | Motion to approve a): a) the proposed by-law attached hereto as Appendix “A” BE INTRODU… | backed a measure that would have increased permitted density or building height | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2024-09-24 | Yea | Approved rezoning 2-4 Audrey Avenue and 186-188 Huron Street from a low-density Residential R1 zone to a higher-density Residential R6 zone, permitting a more intensive residential development. | (3.1) 2-4 Audrey Avenue and 186-188 Huron Street (Z-9755) (Relates to Bill No. 327) | That, on the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development, the following ac… | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2024-08-27 | Yea | Approved, as amended, rezoning a portion of 2060 Dundas Street from Light Industrial and Restricted Service Commercial zoning to a Holding Residential R9 Special Provision zone and Open Space zone, enabling high-density residential redevelopment of the site. | (3.9) 2060 Dundas Street (Z-9547) (Relates to Bill No. 294) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That item 11, clause 3.9, as amended, BE APPROVED. | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-06-25 | Yea | Approved Official Plan and zoning amendments for 323 Oxford Street West and 92/825 Proudfoot Lane permitting building heights up to 18 storeys, and endorsed a draft plan of subdivision with medium- and high-density residential blocks. | (3.8) 323 Oxford St West, 92 and 825 Proudfoot Lane (Z-9416) (Relates to Bills No. 219 and 235) | That, on the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development, the following ac… | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2024-06-25 | Yea | Approved Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments for 735 Southdale Road West permitting residential density up to 231 units per hectare and building heights up to 12 storeys (39 metres). | (3.7) 735 Southdale Road West (OZ-9567) (Relates to Bills No. 218 and 234) | That the following actions be taken with respect to the application by Royal Premier Ho… | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
| 2024-04-02 | Yea | Directed staff to undertake a future growth-management implementation strategy for the built-up area that includes a higher housing-intensification target aligned to the 32.5% mode-share target — a policy direction toward more density within the existing built area, decided as its own amendment separate from reinitiating the Official Plan Review. | (3.8) Official Plan Review of The London Plan and Land Needs Assessment Update (O-9595) | Motion TO AMEND by adding part i) as follows: “i) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED … | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (9 to 4) |
| 2023-11-28 | Yea | Approved an Official Plan amendment and rezoning at 978 Gainsborough Road permitting a maximum density of 370 units per hectare and 17-storey height, to build two 17-storey apartment towers with 481 residential units. | (3.5) 978 Gainsborough Road (Z-9247) (Relates to Bill No.’s 422 and 459) | That, notwithstanding the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development, the… | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2023-10-17 | Yea | Approved rezoning and Official Plan amendments for 50 King Street and 399 Ridout Street to permit two towers up to 53 storeys in the Downtown Place Type, along with associated site-plan design conditions. | (3.5) 50 King Street and 399 Ridout Street (OZ-9622) (Relates to Bills No. 373 and 380) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That item 7 (3.5), as amended, BE APPROVED. | increased permitted density or building height | Motion Passed (11 to 2) |
| 2023-06-27 | Nay | Would have approved the amended Wonderland Road South rezoning package: refusing the applicant’s original 16-storey/office proposal but approving a reduced alternative permitting up to 12 storeys and rezoning the site from a Regional Shopping Area zone to zones that permit residential development; the motion failed. | (3.4) 755, 785 & 815 Wonderland Road South (OZ-9565) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That item 10, clause 3.4, as amended, BE APPROVED. | opposed a measure that would have increased permitted density or building height | Motion Failed (6 to 7) |
approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item vs. denied the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item
Of 23 divided votes since 2023 where the motion’s effect on this axis was clear, this councillor supported 22 measures that would have approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item; opposed 1 measure that would have approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item.
Show all 23 votes behind this pattern (23 rows across 21 distinct decisions — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-21 | Yea | Approved, as amended to add a sidewalk-improvement condition, introducing by-laws to amend the Official Plan and rezone 1076-1080 Commissioners Road West / 396-402 North Street from Residential R1 to a holding Residential R9 Special Provision zone for a new residential development. | (3.6) 1076-1080 Commissioners Road West and 396-402 North Street - OZ-26037 (Relates to Bill No. 273 and No. 289) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2026-07-21 | Yea | Approved, as amended to set a reduced 0.5-space-per-unit parking ratio for affordable housing units, introducing a by-law amending the Zoning By-law to increase minimum residential parking requirements citywide and adjust related parking rules. | (3.3) Parking Provisions Update (Relates to Bill No. 285) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2026-05-12 | Nay | Would have approved introducing Official Plan and zoning by-law amendments for 945 Bluegrass Drive to add a site-specific policy and holding provision enabling the proposed long-term-care development. | (3.3) 945 Bluegrass Drive - OZ-26019 (Relates to Bill No. 194 and 210) | That, on the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development, the following ac… | opposed a measure that would have approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2026-04-21 | Yea | Approved introducing a by-law establishing new Housing Accelerator Fund incentive programs — a temporary waiver of building permit fees and an Additional Residential Unit construction grant — for new home construction. (committee stage) | Housing Accelerator Fund – 2026 Mid-Year Update | That part a) BE APPROVED and reads as follows: That, on the recommendation of the Deput… | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (9 to 4) |
| 2026-03-03 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to bring forward a zoning by-law amendment increasing maximum driveway widths (6m on lots up to 12m wide; 9m on larger lots) and permitting parking in the front or exterior side yard for R1, R2, R3, R4 and R11 zoned lots, outside the Western University Near Campus Neighbourhood. | (4.1) Deputy Mayor S. Lewis, Councillors P. Cuddy and C. Rahman - Zoning By-law Amendment - Parking Changes (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That parts b) and c), as amended, BE APPROVED. | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2025-11-25 | Yea | Approved introducing a zoning by-law amendment to rezone 1269 Hyde Park Road from a Holding Restricted Service Commercial zone to a Holding Business District Commercial special provision zone. | (3.4) 1269 Hyde Park Road - OZ-25105 (Relates to Bill No.’s 412 and 426) | Motion to approve part b): b) the proposed attached by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municip… | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2025-10-14 | Yea | Gave final approval to the 1511 Clarke Road Official Plan and zoning by-law amendments as amended earlier in the same meeting. | (3.5) 1511 Clarke Road - 39T-24505 (Relates to Bill No.’s 369 and 379) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That item 9, clause 3.5, as amended, BE APPROVED. | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (10 to 4) |
| 2025-09-23 | Yea | Ratified a $7,345,000 federal grant agreement under the Interim Housing Assistance Program (IHAP) to provide interim housing for refugee protection claimants, and delegated authority to execute amending agreements. | (2.6) Interim Housing Assistance Program (IHAP) Agreement 2025-2027 (Relates to Bill No. 342) | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Social and Health Development, … | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2025-06-03 | Yea | Introduced a zoning by-law amendment converting land at 20 Clarke Road from Urban Reserve/commercial zoning to residential zones for a subdivision. | (3.1) 20 Clarke Road (Z-25038) (Relates to Bill No. 240) | That, on the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development, the following ac… | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (10 to 4) |
| 2024-12-17 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to initiate an Urban Growth Boundary Review to add approximately 1,476 hectares of developable land to accommodate planned housing growth. | (3.14) Land Needs Assessment - Official Plan Review of The London Plan (O-9595) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part b) of Item 22, clause 3.14, as amended, BE APPROVED. | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2024-12-17 | Yea | Adopted the Land Needs Assessment (Community Growth) for the Section 26 Official Plan Review of The London Plan, and received the Housing Supply Marketplace Analysis and related staff reports, excluding the Urban Growth Boundary expansion parts b), d), and e), which were voted separately. | (3.14) Land Needs Assessment - Official Plan Review of The London Plan (O-9595) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That item 20, clause 3.14, as amended, BE APPROVED, with the exception of parts b), d) … | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-11-26 | Yea | In final vote, approved the amended rezoning of 1408 and 1412 Commissioners Road West from Residential R1 to Residential R8 Special Provision. | (3.7) 1408 and 1412 Commissioners Road West (Z-9780) (Relates to Bill No. 396) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, be approved. | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2024-11-26 | Yea | Approved introducing a zoning by-law amendment for 1408 and 1412 Commissioners Road West, rezoning the property from a Residential R1 zone to a Residential R8 Special Provision zone to permit the applicant’s higher-intensity development. | (3.7) 1408 and 1412 Commissioners Road West (Z-9780) (Relates to Bill No. 396) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion be amended to read as follows: That, on the recommendation of the Direc… | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2024-11-26 | Yea | In final vote, approved introducing the zoning by-law amendment for 145 Base Line Road West, rezoning the property from Residential R3 to a Residential R3 Special Provision zone to permit the applicant’s development, with site-plan conditions on tenant accommodation and on-site parking. | (3.4) 145 Base Line Road West (Z-9783) (Relates to Bill No. 394) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2024-06-04 | Yea | Approved official plan and zoning by-law amendments to rezone 530 Oxford Street West from Community Shopping Area/Open Space to a Residential/Commercial special-provision zone, permitting a new mixed-use residential development. | (3.4) 530 Oxford Street West (OZ-9712) (Relates to Bills No. 186 and 206) | That, on the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development, the following ac… | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2024-05-14 | Yea | Approved extending the Temporary Use (T-79) zoning for 376-390 Hewitt Street and 748 King Street for one year, facilitating the site’s eventual redevelopment into a 24-storey mixed-use apartment tower. | (3.5) 379-390 Hewitt Street and 748 King Street (Z-9718) (Relates to Bill No. 164) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
| 2024-04-23 | Yea | Approved official plan and zoning by-law amendments for 735 Wonderland Road North, rezoning the site to a Business District Commercial Special Provision zone and directing site-plan consultation on affordable housing units. | (3.3) 735 Wonderland Road North - (Z-9704) (Relates to Bill No.’s 132 & 152) | That item 5, clause 3.3, as amended, BE APPROVED. | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
| 2024-04-02 | Yea | Adopted the Official Plan Review and Land Needs Assessment update as amended, including reinitiating the Official Plan Review, incorporating industrial land conversions into the housing land supply (except one property), applying a 25-year planning horizon, and directing a growth management strategy tied to a higher (32.5%) mode share target. | (3.8) Official Plan Review of The London Plan and Land Needs Assessment Update (O-9595) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That item 11, clause 3.8, as amended, BE APPROVED. | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (9 to 3) |
| 2024-02-13 | Yea | Gave final approval, as amended, to the rezoning and Official Plan amendment at 1310 Adelaide Street North and 795 Windermere Road (changing an Open Space zone to a Holding Open Space Special Provision zone permitting development). | (3.9) 1310 Adelaide Street North and 795 Windermere Road (OZ-8709) (Relates to Bill No. 58 and Bill No. 71) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That item 14, clause 3.9, as amended, BE APPROVED. | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2023-09-26 | Yea | Approved Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments rezoning 1364-1408 Hyde Park Road from Urban Reserve to Special Provision R9 Residential and Open Space zones, enabling new residential development on the site. | (3.6) 1364-1408 Hyde Park Road (OZ-9635) (Relates to Bill No.’s 344 and 364) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Item 7 (clause 3.6), as amended, BE APPROVED. | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2023-07-25 | Yea | Approved rezoning 599-601 Richmond Street from a Business District Commercial Special Provision Bonus Zone to a Business District Commercial Special Provision zone for redevelopment, and directed staff to work with the applicant toward including affordable housing units in the project | (3.10) 599-601 Richmond Street (Z-9607) (Relates to Bill No. 251) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2023-04-04 | Yea | Approved introducing the by-law to rezone 614 Westmount Crescent from Residential (R1-9) to Residential R5 Special Provision (R5-5) for a LA-Rosa Community Ltd. townhouse development (Z-9553), with a list of urban-design/site-plan matters (height transition, tree protection, sidewalk installation, amenity space, etc.) flagged for the Site Plan Approval Authority. | (3.7) 614 Westmount Crescent (Z-9553) (Relates to Bill No. 116) | Motion to approve part a) of the motion: That, the following actions be taken with resp… | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (12 to 1) |
| 2023-02-14 | Yea | Approved, as amended, item 11 clause 3.5 of the underlying committee report: introducing the by-law to rezone 608 Commissioners Road West (Z-9516) from Residential (R1-9) to Residential R8 Special Provision (R8-4) for the Zelinka Priamo/Copia Developments application, after the preceding motion to send the application back for reduced height/density had failed. | (3.5) 608 Commissioners Road West (Z-9516) (Relates to Bill No. 67) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That item 11, clause 3.5, as amended, BE APPROVED. | approved the development, rezoning, or housing-policy item | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
expanded where additional housing types are permitted vs. restricted where additional housing types are permitted
Of 7 divided votes since 2023 where the motion’s effect on this axis was clear, this councillor supported 4 measures that would have expanded where additional housing types are permitted; supported 2 measures that would have restricted where additional housing types are permitted; opposed 1 measure that would have restricted where additional housing types are permitted.
Show all 7 votes behind this pattern (7 rows across 5 distinct decisions — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-03 | Yea | Set a citywide residential parking minimum of 1 space per unit (with exemptions for affordable-housing-agreement and Protected Major Transit Station Area developments) and removed the zoning prohibition on adding an extra driveway for a lot with an additional residential unit. | (4.1) Deputy Mayor S. Lewis, Councillors P. Cuddy and C. Rahman - Zoning By-law Amendment - Parking Changes (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That parts a) and d), as amended, BE APPROVED. | expanded where additional housing types are permitted | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2025-11-04 | Yea | Approved a package capping Additional Residential Units at a maximum of two bedrooms each (three combined for attached ARUs, three combined for detached ARUs) at 80% gross floor area, and directed an Interim Control By-law temporarily restricting new ARUs exceeding those bedroom-count or unit-size limits pending a land use study. | (4.1) Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor C. Rahman - Proposal to Limit Bedroom Count in Additional Residential Units (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED | restricted where additional housing types are permitted | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-11-04 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to bring forward an Interim Control By-law temporarily restricting new Additional Residential Units that exceed bedroom count or unit size limits, and to undertake a land use study. | (4.1) Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor C. Rahman - Proposal to Limit Bedroom Count in Additional Residential Units (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion BE AMENDED to add new parts that read as follows: e) the Civic Administ… | restricted where additional housing types are permitted | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-06-03 | Yea | Introduced Official Plan and zoning amendments permitting stacked townhouses and apartment buildings up to 8-12 storeys at 168 Meadowlily Road South. | (3.4) 168 Meadowlily Road South (OZ-9763) (Relates to Bill No.’s 196 and 243) | That, on the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development, the following ac… | expanded where additional housing types are permitted | Motion Passed (9 to 5) |
| 2024-09-24 | Yea | Adopted Phase 2 of the Section 26 Official Plan/Zoning Review of The London Plan as amended, including permitting stacked townhouses along all Neighbourhood Connectors and setting new maximum building heights (up to 35 storeys in Transit Villages, 25 storeys in Rapid Transit Corridors, and 15 storeys in Urban Corridors). | Major Shopping Area (OZ-9726, OZ-9727, O-9752 and O-9753) (Relates to Bills No. 311 and 332) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED | expanded where additional housing types are permitted | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2024-09-24 | Nay | Would have narrowed the Official Plan amendment so stacked townhouses are permitted on Neighbourhood Connectors only in Central London (rather than city-wide), and directed further public consultation before any broader change. | Major Shopping Area (OZ-9726, OZ-9727, O-9752 and O-9753) (Relates to Bills No. 311 and 332) | That the motion with respect to Phase 2 of the Section 26 Official Plan Review of The L… | opposed a measure that would have restricted where additional housing types are permitted | Motion Failed (6 to 8) |
| 2024-06-25 | Yea | Adopted Official Plan Amendment schedules for the London Plan’s Land Needs Assessment review, including a new Specific Area Policy permitting fourplexes, stacked townhomes, and mid-rise apartment buildings up to eight storeys on identified Hyde Park-area properties. | (3.9) Draft Land Needs Assessment of The London Plan (O-9595) (Relates to Bill No. 220) | That, the following actions be taken with respect to the Sections 17(22) of the Plannin… | expanded where additional housing types are permitted | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
approved funding or land for affordable housing vs. denied funding or land for affordable housing
Of 5 divided votes since 2023 where the motion’s effect on this axis was clear, this councillor supported 5 measures that would have approved funding or land for affordable housing.
Show all 5 votes behind this pattern
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-23 | Yea | Approved Ballance It Inc. as the leading proponent to receive municipal land at 1958 Duluth Crescent, Block 6 for an affordable housing project, and approved introducing a by-law to authorize and execute the associated Contribution Agreement. | (2.7) Award of NRFP-2025-248: Municipal Land for Affordable Housing at 1958 Duluth Crescent, Block 6 (Relates to Bill No. 239) | That the balance of the motion BE APPROVED: That, on the recommendation of the Deputy C… | approved funding or land for affordable housing | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2026-02-03 | Yea | Approved (at committee) introducing the by-law creating the new Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Program financial-incentive program, as amended to restrict eligibility to first-time, current-resident home buyers with a ten-year loan term. (committee stage) | Mayoral Direction 2026-001: Creation of an Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Program | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED; it being noted that Civic Administration will… | approved funding or land for affordable housing | Motion Passed (8 to 6) |
| 2025-11-25 | Yea | Approved introducing the by-law authorizing a Service Agreement between the City and Gilzean’s Creek Housing Co-operative Inc. | (2.9) Approval of Service Agreement with Gilzean’s Creek Housing Co-operative Inc. (Relates to Bill No. 408) | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Housing and Community Growth, t… | approved funding or land for affordable housing | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2025-07-22 | Yea | Introduced by-laws approving the standard Homeownership Loan Agreement and amending the reserve-fund by-law to enable loans under the Affordable Homeownership Program. | (2.3) Affordable Homeownership Program Relaunch (Relates to Bill No.’s 277 and 281) | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Housing and Community Growth, t… | approved funding or land for affordable housing | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2025-06-03 | Yea | Approved forgivable-loan grants of $1,485,000 and $3,690,000 and introduced the by-law financing and authorizing contribution agreements for two highly supportive housing developments (248-256 Hill Street, 33 units; 644-646 Huron Street, 82 units). | (4.3) RFP-2024-227 Approval of the Template Contribution Agreement for Highly Supportive Housing Projects at 248-256 Hill Street and 644-646 Huron Street (Relates to Bill No. 182) | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Housing and Community Growth th… | approved funding or land for affordable housing | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
72 motions with no clear direction on this issue (excluded from the pattern counts above; shown for transparency, not as evidence of a position)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-23 | Yea | Approved rezoning 929 Cheapside Street from Convenience Commercial / Residential R1 to Residential R9 (permitting an apartment building), while refusing the applicant’s additional requested special provisions for reduced yard setbacks, increased lot coverage, and reduced landscaped open space, which the motion states would have made the development too intense for the site. | (3.8) 929 Cheapside Street - Z-26003 (Relates to Bill No. 261) | That, on the recommendation of the Director, Planning and Development, the following ac… | Motion Passed (9 to 4) |
| 2026-06-23 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to submit an application to the federal Build Canada Homes program to secure capital funding for new affordable housing in London and Middlesex County. | (2.4) Request to Submit an Application for New Affordable Housing Funding Through Build Canada Homes | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Housing and Community Growth, t… | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2026-04-13 | Yea | Approved part e) of the Tolpuddle Co-operative motion, directing Civic Administration to report back to Council on the progress of the housing co-op’s capital and operational Transition Plan in Q4 2026. (committee stage) | Tolpuddle Co-operative Inc. Capital and Operational Transition Plan (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part e) of the motion BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (4 to 1) |
| 2026-03-24 | Yea | Approved adding partial or full development-charge rebate options for new residential development as one of the items Civic Administration must include when it reports back to Council with options to quickly incentivize housing activity within the remaining Housing Accelerator Fund window. (committee stage) | Mayoral Direction 2026-001: Creation of an Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Program - Report Back on Program Options | That part a) ii) BE APPROVED: ii) partial (or full) development charge rebate options f… | Motion Passed (10 to 4) |
| 2026-03-09 | Yea | Would have amended the short-term-accommodation by-law to cap occupancy at a Dwelling Unit offering short-term accommodation at no more than two individuals per bedroom (excluding children under 2), with single-room occupant limits set by inspection. (committee stage) | Short Term Accommodation Licensing and Penalties | That part b) BE AMENDED to read as follows: the proposed by-law, as appended to the abo… | Motion Failed (2 to 3) |
| 2026-03-09 | Nay | Amended the Short Term Accommodation Licensing motion to note that the Committee may, at a future time, request a staff report on imposing minimal distance requirements between short-term accommodations. (committee stage) | Short Term Accommodation Licensing and Penalties | That the motion BE AMENDED to add a new part that reads as follows: Notwithstanding the… | Motion Passed (3 to 2) |
| 2026-03-03 | Nay | Would have added a requirement to map on-street parking availability and explore best-practice options for linking parking minimums to site characteristics, then report back to Committee. | (4.1) Deputy Mayor S. Lewis, Councillors P. Cuddy and C. Rahman - Zoning By-law Amendment - Parking Changes | That the motion BE AMENDED by adding a new part e) and f) to read as follows: e) to map… | Motion Failed (4 to 10) |
| 2026-03-03 | Yea | Amended the 550 Ridout Street North & 82-90 Kent Street rezoning motion (OZ-25152) to request that the applicant prepare a tenant relocation plan addressing matters raised in a communication from a nearby developer. | (3.5) 550 Ridout Street North & 82-90 Kent Street - OZ-25152 (Relates to Bill No. 105 and 123) | That the motion BE AMENDED to add new parts to read as follows: d) that the Applicant B… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Approved referring the Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Program’s by-law back to Civic Administration to report on program options (length, capital gains vs. interest, sliding-scale forgiveness, down payment vs. cash back) in consultation with private-sector partners, rather than adopting the by-law that day. | (2.4) Mayoral Direction 2026-001: Creation of an Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Program | That the referral, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2026-02-10 | Nay | Would have reverted the Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Program’s loan term from ten years back down to five years. | (2.4) Mayoral Direction 2026-001: Creation of an Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Program | That part b) of the motion BE AMENDED by deleting the words “the term of the loan is ex… | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Added a site-specific design condition requiring transom-style windows on the west side of the approved apartment building to limit privacy impacts on neighbouring low-rise homes. | (3.4) 767 Fanshawe Park Road East and 679 Dunboyne Crescent - Z-25151 (Relates to Bill No. 82) | that part b) of the motion BE AMENDED to include the following wording: Incorporate tra… | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Added a site-specific zoning condition prohibiting a sidewalk/access connection between the new apartment complex at 767 Fanshawe Park Road East and Dunboyne Crescent. | (3.4) 767 Fanshawe Park Road East and 679 Dunboyne Crescent - Z-25151 (Relates to Bill No. 82) | vi) the sidewalk and/or access on/through 679 Dunboyne Crescent from the apartment comp… | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Added a site-specific zoning condition prohibiting rooftop amenity space on the approved apartment building at 767 Fanshawe Park Road East. | (3.4) 767 Fanshawe Park Road East and 679 Dunboyne Crescent - Z-25151 (Relates to Bill No. 82) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | vi. Rooftop amenity shall be prohibited; and | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Would have reduced the maximum permitted building height for the 767 Fanshawe Park Road East / 679 Dunboyne Crescent apartment rezoning to 24.5 metres. | (3.4) 767 Fanshawe Park Road East and 679 Dunboyne Crescent - Z-25151 (Relates to Bill No. 82) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | iii. Building Height (maximum): 24.5 metres; | Motion Failed (2 to 13) |
| 2026-02-03 | Yea | Amended the Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Program to extend its loan term from five years to ten years. (committee stage) | Mayoral Direction 2026-001: Creation of an Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Program | That the motion BE FURTHER AMENDED to extend the term of the loan from five years to te… | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
| 2026-02-03 | Yea | Amended the Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Program to restrict eligibility to first-time home buyers. (committee stage) | Mayoral Direction 2026-001: Creation of an Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Program | That the motion BE AMENDED to direct Civic Administration to restrict the program eligi… | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
| 2026-02-03 | Nay | Would have referred the Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Program back to Civic Administration for a report on program options (expanding to existing housing stock, tightening eligibility, funding sources, budget detail, other jurisdictions). (committee stage) | Mayoral Direction 2026-001: Creation of an Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Program | That Mayoral Directive 2026-001: Creation of an Affordable Home Ownership Incentive Pro… | Motion Failed (7 to 7) |
| 2026-01-13 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to stop the procurement process seeking proposals to redevelop the City-owned 84 Horton Street and 199 Ridout Street parking lots into high-density housing with public parking. (committee stage) | Mayoral Direction 2024-001 – City-Owned Parking Lot Redevelopment 199 Ridout Street North and 84 Horton Street East | b) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to take no further action on a procurement proc… | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2025-12-01 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to report back with recommendations on municipal options to limit ‘bad-faith’ tenancy evictions tied to demolitions and conversions of residential premises. (committee stage) | Enhancing Municipal Options to Prevent the Unnecessary Loss of Affordable Housing | That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to the Community and Protectiv… | Motion Failed (2 to 2) |
| 2025-11-25 | Yea | Received the staff report concluding the Housing Collaborative Initiative project with updated financials, as amended to also require a further cost report-back. | (2.8) Housing Collaborative Initiative - Updated Financials and Project Conclusion (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-11-25 | Yea | Added a direction for Civic Administration to report back on any further Housing Collaborative Initiative costs beyond what was already publicly reported. | (2.8) Housing Collaborative Initiative - Updated Financials and Project Conclusion | That the motion be amended by adding a new part to read as follows: the Civic Administr… | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2025-10-14 | Yea | Received, without adopting, the draft Urban Growth Boundary Review documents for Employment Areas and Community Growth as information. | (3.7) Official Plan Review of The London Plan: Final Industrial Land Needs Assessment, Urban Growth Boundary Review Update, and Process Updates (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part b) of the motion be approved. | Motion Passed (10 to 3) |
| 2025-10-14 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to add, for information purposes only, a map showing a 1,054-hectare urban growth boundary expansion as an appendix to the final Official Plan review report. | (3.7) Official Plan Review of The London Plan: Final Industrial Land Needs Assessment, Urban Growth Boundary Review Update, and Process Updates | That the motion be amended by adding a new part i): i) the Civic Administration BE DIRE… | Motion Failed (5 to 8) |
| 2025-08-11 | Nay | Directed Civic Administration to report back with the potential of requiring signage disclosing whether a rental property and its units comply with municipal standards. (committee stage) | Residential Rental Unit Licensing By-law | That the motion BE AMENDED to include a new part to read as follows: The Civic Administ… | Motion Passed (3 to 1) |
| 2025-07-22 | Nay | Would have referred the 6309 Pack Road rezoning application to a future meeting rather than deciding it, to let staff and the applicant review reducing the proposed building heights and density. | OZ-25023) (Relates to Bill No.’s 286 and 302) | That the application of Southside Construction Ltd. relating to the property located at… | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2025-07-22 | Nay | Would have referred the Affordable Homeownership Program Relaunch staff report to a future Community and Protective Services Committee meeting, to allow Civic Administration to prepare a business case asking the Province to reallocate the program’s funds to another affordable-housing purpose (e.g., social-housing repairs, affordable rental repairs, rent-affordability assistance). | (2.3) Affordable Homeownership Program Relaunch (Relates to Bill No.’s 277 and 281) | That the staff report dated July 14, 2025 related to the Affordable Homeownership Progr… | Motion Failed (2 to 13) |
| 2025-06-24 | Yea | Would have referred the Highly Supportive Housing Plan cost breakdown schedule to a future meeting for more detailed cost breakdowns, rather than deciding on it. | (2.9) Updated Highly Supportive Housing Plan Cost Breakdown Schedule | That the staff report dated June 9, 2025 with respect to the Updated Highly Supportive … | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2025-06-17 | Yea | Referred the potential redevelopment of the 641 Queens Ave city-owned parking lot for staff to solicit expressions of interest to construct new dwelling units, and to report back in Q4 2025. (committee stage) | Mayoral Direction 2024-001, City-owned Parking Lot Redevelopment | That part c) be amended to read as follows: c) that the potential redevelopment of the … | Motion Passed (12 to 1) |
| 2025-06-09 | Yea | Would have referred the Highly Supportive Housing Plan cost breakdown schedule to a future meeting for more detailed cost breakdowns, rather than deciding on it. (committee stage) | Updated Highly Supportive Housing Plan Cost Breakdown Schedule | That the staff report dated June 9, 2025 with respect to the Updated Highly Supportive … | Motion Failed (2 to 3) |
| 2025-06-03 | Nay | Would have required all future forgivable-loan agreements for highly supportive housing to include provisions letting Council demand loan repayment or impose other consequences if operating standards aren’t met. | (4.3) RFP-2024-227 Approval of the Template Contribution Agreement for Highly Supportive Housing Projects at 248-256 Hill Street and 644-646 Huron Street (Relates to Bill No. 182) | That the motion BE AMENDED to include a new part that reads as follows: The Civic Admin… | Motion Failed (4 to 10) |
| 2025-06-03 | Yea | Added a requirement that Civic Administration seek Council’s approval (rather than proceeding on delegated authority) before entering contribution or loan agreements for any highly supportive housing project. | (4.2) Memo - Affordable and Supportive Housing Agreement Templates (Relates to Bill No. 181) | That the motion BE AMENDED to include a new part that reads as follows: The Civic Admin… | Motion Passed (10 to 4) |
| 2025-05-13 | Yea | Set the final delegation carve-out to cover only highly supportive housing (dropping the broader ‘supportive housing’ exception), meaning only highly-supportive-housing contribution-agreement changes would require Council approval rather than being delegated to staff. | (2.5) Approval of the Template Contribution Agreement for Affordable Housing Projects (Relates to Bill No. 158) | That part a) ii) to read as follows: ii) authorize the Deputy City Manager, Housing and… | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2025-05-13 | Yea | Narrowed the delegation carve-out to cover only supportive or highly supportive housing terms (dropping the earlier tenancy-profile exception), which would still require Council approval rather than being delegated. | (2.5) Approval of the Template Contribution Agreement for Affordable Housing Projects (Relates to Bill No. 158) | That the motion be further amended in part a) ii) to read as follows: ii) authorize the… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-05-13 | Yea | Narrowed that staff delegation with a carve-out: changes to tenancy profiles, or to supportive or highly supportive housing terms, would still require Council approval rather than being delegated to staff. | (2.5) Approval of the Template Contribution Agreement for Affordable Housing Projects (Relates to Bill No. 158) | That the motion be further amended in part a) ii) to read as follows: ii) authorize the… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-05-13 | Yea | Amended the by-law to authorize the Deputy City Manager, Housing and Community Growth (rather than requiring a Council vote) to approve future amendments to the Affordable Housing Contribution Agreement template. | (2.5) Approval of the Template Contribution Agreement for Affordable Housing Projects (Relates to Bill No. 158) | That part a) ii) be amended to read as follows: ii) authorize the Deputy City Manager, … | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2024-12-17 | Yea | Requested the Province support a further Urban Growth Boundary expansion of approximately 2,000 hectares of developable land to accelerate London’s housing supply, and directed staff to develop an alternate 2,000-hectare growth scenario if that support is received. | (3.14) Land Needs Assessment - Official Plan Review of The London Plan (O-9595) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That parts d) and e) of item 22, clause 3.14, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2024-12-17 | Yea | Requested the Mayor engage Southwestern Ontario Mayors and Wardens in discussion about regional growth, as part of the Land Needs Assessment / Official Plan Review process. | (3.14) Land Needs Assessment - Official Plan Review of The London Plan (O-9595) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion be amended to include new part i) to read as follows: i) that the Mayor… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-12-17 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to develop an additional, smaller (approximately 1,130-hectare) Urban Growth Boundary land-supply scenario alongside the already-proposed 2,000-hectare scenario; the motion failed. | (3.14) Land Needs Assessment - Official Plan Review of The London Plan (O-9595) | That the motion be amended to include new part g) to read as follows: g) the Civic Admi… | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2024-12-17 | Yea | Confirmed the applicant’s community-benefit commitments for the Meadowlily Road rezoning: new playgrounds for two elementary schools and a donation to Urban Roots. | (3.10) 21-41 Meadowlily Road North and 20 Norlan Avenue (Relates to Bill No. 37) | That item 18, clause 3.10, as amended, BE APPROVED in part as follows: it being noted t… | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2024-12-17 | Yea | Replaced the developer’s committed sewer-line construction for Urban Roots with a cash donation of an amount to be determined later, as part of the 21-41 Meadowlily Road North rezoning file. | (3.10) 21-41 Meadowlily Road North and 20 Norlan Avenue (Relates to Bill No. 37) | That the motion be amended to delete part b) ii) “constructing a sewer line, at their c… | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2024-09-09 | Nay | Directed that a draft by-law regulating maximum temperatures in rental units be prepared for a future Community and Protective Services Committee meeting, without setting the standard itself. (committee stage) | Regulating Maximum Temperature in Rental Units (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve part b) of the motion. | Motion Passed (4 to 1) |
| 2024-09-09 | Yea | Would have approved taking no action on expanding the Residential Rental Unit Licensing By-law (CP-19) to license all multi-unit residential dwellings up to and including four storeys; failed 2-3, meaning the committee majority rejected ‘no action’ rather than approving it. (committee stage) | Renovictions - Amendments to the Business Licensing By-law to Introduce a Rental Unit Repair Licence | Motion to approve part e) of the main motion: e) that NO ACTION BE TAKEN to amend By-la… | Motion Failed (2 to 3) |
| 2024-09-09 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to amend the Business Licensing By-law to include temporary alternative accommodation for displaced tenants and short-term rental top-ups, modeled on the City of Hamilton’s by-law, for Council’s consideration in September 2024. (committee stage) | Renovictions - Amendments to the Business Licensing By-law to Introduce a Rental Unit Repair Licence (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to amend By-law No. L.-131-16, being “A by-la… | Motion Failed (2 to 4) |
| 2024-09-09 | Nay | Would have referred the renovictions business-licensing amendments back to Civic Administration to report back with rent top-ups and alternate accommodations added to the by-law. (committee stage) | Renovictions - Amendments to the Business Licensing By-law to Introduce a Rental Unit Repair Licence (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the matter of renovictions and amendments to the business licensing by-law BE REFE… | Motion Failed (2 to 4) |
| 2024-07-23 | Nay | Directed Civic Administration to report back on possible temporary alternate accommodations, or a short-term rental top-up, for tenants displaced by renoviction-related repairs. | (3.1) Renovictions - Renovation License and Relocation By-law Changes - Public Comments Received (To Date) | That part b) BE APPROVED and reads as follows: b) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED … | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2024-07-23 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to report back on draft language extending the renoviction by-law’s protections to residents who had already received an N13 eviction notice. | (3.1) Renovictions - Renovation License and Relocation By-law Changes - Public Comments Received (To Date) | That part c) BE APPROVED and reads as follows: c) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED … | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2024-06-25 | Yea | Endorsed using the 2023 Ministry of Finance population projections, rather than the Council-approved 2021-2051 corporate growth projections, as the basis for the Land Needs Assessment and Urban Growth Boundary Review, subject to further consultation and consultant findings. | (3.9) Draft Land Needs Assessment of The London Plan (O-9595) (Relates to Bill No. 220) | Motion to approve the following: d) notwithstanding the Council-approved corporate grow… | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
| 2024-06-25 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to engage a third-party economic consultant to conduct a housing-supply marketplace analysis and recommend the land supply needed to meet Council’s provincial housing pledge — a study, not a housing-supply decision itself. | (3.9) Draft Land Needs Assessment of The London Plan (O-9595) (Relates to Bill No. 220) | Motion to approve the following: e) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to engage a th… | Motion Passed (9 to 5) |
| 2024-05-14 | Yea | Would have referred the item back to Planning and Environment Committee to consider extending the temporary-use zoning for three years instead of one; failed, so no referral occurred. | (3.5) 379-390 Hewitt Street and 748 King Street (Z-9718) (Relates to Bill No. 164) | That the motion, as amended, BE REFERRED to a future meeting of the Planning and Enviro… | Motion Failed (4 to 10) |
| 2024-05-14 | Yea | Added a note to the temporary-use zoning extension motion flagging that Council would consider a further 2+ year extension later if the applicant progresses signed parking-lot improvements; the note itself decides nothing about the zoning extension’s length. | (3.5) 379-390 Hewitt Street and 748 King Street (Z-9718) (Relates to Bill No. 164) | That the motion BE AMENDED to include the following: It being further noted, that as SP… | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2024-04-23 | Yea | Approved raising the maximum building height in the Byron Gravel Pits Secondary Plan from 18 to 22 storeys while simultaneously lowering the plan’s required affordable-housing share from 25% to 10-15% — two opposite-direction housing changes bundled in one vote. | (3.4) Byron Gravel Pit Secondary Plan (Relates to Bill No. 133) | That parts a) ix) and x) BE APPROVED: ix) AMEND Schedule 1 from 18 storeys with an uppe… | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
| 2024-04-23 | Nay | Would have added a note to the record about resident traffic/density concerns and asked that the issue be included in future Mobility Master Plan reports; failed, so no note was added and nothing was decided. | (3.3) 735 Wonderland Road North - (Z-9704) (Relates to Bill No.’s 132 & 152) | That the motion be amended to include the following: That it BE FURTHER NOTED that thro… | Motion Failed (6 to 8) |
| 2024-04-23 | Nay | Would have added a study of cut-through-traffic ‘filtered-permeability’ mitigation measures to a future Civic Works Committee agenda; failed. | (3.3) 735 Wonderland Road North - (Z-9704) (Relates to Bill No.’s 132 & 152) | That the motion be amended to include new part c) iv) to read as follows: iv) to study … | Motion Failed (4 to 10) |
| 2024-04-02 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to undertake reviews of servicing capacity and of London Plan policy changes that would support increased intensification within the Urban Growth Boundaries, without itself approving any policy change. | (3.8) Official Plan Review of The London Plan and Land Needs Assessment Update (O-9595) | Motion TO AMEND by adding parts i )and j) as follows: “j) the Civic Administration BE D… | Motion Failed (6 to 7) |
| 2024-03-26 | Yea | Would have asked Civic Administration to report back on expected funding sources for future Highly Supportive Housing units and a list of other conversions being considered, deciding nothing itself. (committee stage) | London’s Health & Homelessness Whole of Community System Response Proposed Highly Supportive Housing Plan | That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back at a future meeting of the Str… | Motion Failed (2 to 13) |
| 2024-03-26 | Nay | Would have asked Civic Administration to report back on the rationale for switching from 15 temporary resting-space beds at 448 Horton Street to 24 highly supportive housing units at 362 Dundas Street, deciding nothing itself. (committee stage) | London’s Health & Homelessness Whole of Community System Response Proposed Highly Supportive Housing Plan | That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back at a future meeting of the Str… | Motion Failed (2 to 13) |
| 2024-02-13 | Nay | Would have required further public notice under the Planning Act before the 1310 Adelaide Street North / 795 Windermere Road rezoning by-law could proceed; the motion failed, so no further notice was required. | (3.9) 1310 Adelaide Street North and 795 Windermere Road (OZ-8709) (Relates to Bill No. 58 and Bill No. 71) | Pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, as determined by the Municipal Council,… | Motion Failed (4 to 11) |
| 2024-02-13 | Yea | Approved a zoning amendment at 1310 Adelaide Street North and 795 Windermere Road allowing up to three commercial units, including one restaurant with a drive-through facility. | (3.9) 1310 Adelaide Street North and 795 Windermere Road (OZ-8709) (Relates to Bill No. 58 and Bill No. 71) | That the following amendment BE APPROVED to the associated by-law (Bill No. 71) as it r… | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2023-10-17 | Yea | Amended the 50 King Street/399 Ridout Street site-plan design requests to add solar installation and EV-charging requirements and a LEED-or-similar green certification requirement, alongside the bird-friendly glazing wording. | (3.5) 50 King Street and 399 Ridout Street (OZ-9622) (Relates to Bills No. 373 and 380) | That part c) of the clause BE AMENDED with respect to parts iv), and the addition of pa… | Motion Passed (8 to 5) |
| 2023-10-17 | Yea | Amended a site-plan design request for the 50 King Street/399 Ridout Street towers so the bird-friendly glazing requirement would be described as consistent with London Plan section 304, rather than the original wording. | (3.5) 50 King Street and 399 Ridout Street (OZ-9622) (Relates to Bills No. 373 and 380) | That part c) of the clause BE FURTHER AMENDED with respect to part iv): iv) utilize vis… | Motion Passed (10 to 3) |
| 2023-10-10 | Nay | Approved referring the Homes Ontario correspondence to the Association of Municipalities of Ontario for consideration. (committee stage) | Establishing Homes Ontario - T. Kernaghan, MPP (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Part c), as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (8 to 5) |
| 2023-10-10 | Nay | Approved advising the Government of Ontario that London City Council supports a provincial motion to establish and fund Homes Ontario to finance and build 250,000 new affordable and non-market homes on public land over ten years. (committee stage) | Establishing Homes Ontario - T. Kernaghan, MPP (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Part b), as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (7 to 6) |
| 2023-10-10 | Nay | Amended the motion to add council’s advisory support for a provincial motion to establish and fund Homes Ontario to build 250,000 new affordable and non-market homes, and to refer the matter to AMO for consideration. (committee stage) | Establishing Homes Ontario - T. Kernaghan, MPP (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion BE AMENDED to include parts b) and c) as follows: b) that the Governmen… | Motion Passed (7 to 6) |
| 2023-09-26 | Nay | Amended the motion to add a request to the Site Plan Approval Authority to consider an increase to on-site parking at the 1364-1408 Hyde Park Road development. | (3.6) 1364-1408 Hyde Park Road (OZ-9635) (Relates to Bill No.’s 344 and 364) | That Item 7 (3.6), BE AMENDED, by adding the following new part c) ii) as follows: “ii)… | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2023-09-26 | Yea | Amended the site-plan design conditions for the 3234-3274 Wonderland Road South rezoning (landscaping, pedestrian network, glazing, tree planting, stormwater/low-impact-development features, and an updated transportation impact study). | (3.5) 3234-3274 Wonderland Road South (Z-9618) (Relates to Bill No. 363) | That part c), BE AMENDED to read as follows: “c) the Site Plan Approval Authority BE RE… | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2023-09-26 | Nay | Would have added a request to the Site Plan Approval Authority to consider increased underground parking capacity as part of the 1515 Trossacks Avenue development. | (3.4) 1515 Trossacks Avenue (Z-9632) (Relates to Bill No. 360) | That part b) of clause 3.4 BE AMENDED by adding the following part ii): “ii) increased … | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2023-07-25 | Yea | Added a requirement that Civic Administration report back with a status update on the affordable-housing agreement for 599-601 Richmond Street once negotiations between the applicant and Municipal Housing Development begin and again once they conclude | (3.10) 599-601 Richmond Street (Z-9607) (Relates to Bill No. 251) | That the motion BE AMENDED by adding the following new part c): c) the Civic Administra… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2023-06-27 | Yea | Amended the Wonderland Road South rezoning clause to note that a noise/vibration study and a shadow study would be required through the Site Plan Approval process. | (3.4) 755, 785 & 815 Wonderland Road South (OZ-9565) | That Clause 3.4 BE AMENDED by adding the following at the end of the clause: It being n… | Motion Passed (12 to 1) |
| 2023-06-27 | Yea | Referred the 221 Queens Avenue temporary-zoning application back to the Planning and Environment Committee for further discussion on an enhanced landscaping plan and a possible three-year extension. | (3.1) 221 Queens Avenue (TZ-9598) (Relates to Bill No. 201) | That the application related to 221 Queens Avenue, BE REFERRED back to the Planning and… | Motion Passed (10 to 3) |
| 2023-06-06 | Yea | A yea broadened the scope of a directed staff review of the five-bedroom limit on additional residential units to also cover the Residential and Business Licensing By-laws for lodging houses, with a report back to a future committee — no substantive decision on ARU rules was made. | (3.4) Additional Residential Unit Amendments as a Result of More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill23) (OZ-9581) (Relates to Bill No.’s 166 and 179) | That Item 13, clause 3.4, part c), BE AMENDED to read as follows: “c) the Civic Adminis… | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2023-06-06 | Nay | A yea would have referred part c) — a directed staff review of the five-bedroom limit on additional residential units — to a future Planning and Environment Committee meeting rather than deciding it that day. | (3.4) Additional Residential Unit Amendments as a Result of More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill23) (OZ-9581) (Relates to Bill No.’s 166 and 179) | That Item 13, clause 3.4, part c), BE REFERRED to a future Planning and Environment Com… | Motion Failed (7 to 7) |
| 2023-02-14 | Nay | Would have referred the 608 Commissioners Road West rezoning application (Z-9516) back to Civic Administration to work with the applicant on a revised by-law reducing the maximum height to four storeys and maximum density to sixty-four units; failed 5-10. | (3.5) 608 Commissioners Road West (Z-9516) (Relates to Bill No. 67) | That the application for 608 Commissioners Road West (Z-9516) BE REFERRED back to the C… | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
Taxes & Budget
Of the 82 divided votes on this issue since 2023 that had a clear direction, this councillor has a recorded position on 79 of them (11 of these are excluded from the pattern counts — see below). 2 recused. The other 1: 1 was a motion with no recorded vote for this councillor at that meeting.
Budget votes since 2024 are votes on amendments to the Mayor’s tabled budget under Ontario’s strong-mayor powers, not on an independently council-drafted budget — see what that changes about what a budget vote means.
increased the tax levy or a budget item vs. reduced the tax levy or a budget item
Of 64 divided votes since 2023 where the motion’s effect on this axis was clear, this councillor supported 16 measures that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item; opposed 21 measures that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item; supported 20 measures that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item; opposed 7 measures that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item.
11 votes excluded from the pattern above: this councillor’s recorded votes within each of these 3 decisions pointed in different directions across their stages, so none are counted in the tallies; each is listed here:
-
Yea: Would have increased Business Case No. P-46 (Economic and Partnership Initiatives) funding by adding actions 3 and 6, roughly $75,000-$100,000 per year. — (3.38) Amendment - Business Case No. P-46 (February 29, 2024, counts as for, Motion Failed (4 to 11))
-
Yea: Reduced Business Case No. P-46 (Economic and Partnership Initiatives) Action 12 funding by $450,000 per year for 2025-2027. — (3.38) Amendment - Business Case No. P-46 (February 29, 2024, counts as against, Motion Passed (14 to 1))
-
Yea: Increased the London Public Library’s 2024 base-budget increase from the Mayor’s proposed 5.4% to 7% (+$331,931). (committee stage) — Amendment - London Public Library Base Budget (February 15, 2024, counts as for, Motion Passed (9 to 6))
-
Nay: Would have increased the London Public Library’s 2025 base-budget increase from the Mayor’s proposed 6.0% to 8% (+$833,824). (committee stage) — Amendment - London Public Library Base Budget (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) (February 15, 2024, counts as against, Motion Failed (6 to 9))
-
Nay: Would have increased the London Public Library’s 2026 base-budget increase from the Mayor’s proposed 5.1% to 9% (+$1,876,707). (committee stage) — Amendment - London Public Library Base Budget (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) (February 15, 2024, counts as against, Motion Failed (6 to 9))
-
Nay: Would have increased the London Public Library’s 2027 base-budget increase from the Mayor’s proposed 5.2% to 9% (+$3,039,325). (committee stage) — Amendment - London Public Library Base Budget (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) (February 15, 2024, counts as against, Motion Failed (5 to 10))
-
Nay: Reduced annual walkway maintenance funding by $60,000 (cutting the operating budget and tax levy by the same amount). (committee stage) — Review of For Consideration Property Tax Operating Budget Amendments (2023 totals rounded to the closest $1,000) (January 26, 2023, counts as for, Motion Passed (9 to 5))
-
Nay: Would have reduced previously approved additional investment in winter maintenance by $740,000 (cutting the operating budget and tax levy by the same amount); failed 5-9. (committee stage) — Review of For Consideration Property Tax Operating Budget Amendments (2023 totals rounded to the closest $1,000) (January 26, 2023, counts as for, Motion Failed (5 to 9))
-
Yea: Approved Budget Amendment Case No. P-11: reduced the tax levy and operating budget by $200,000 by cutting Horticulture Aesthetics service levels within Parks and Horticulture. (committee stage) — Review of For Consideration Property Tax Operating Budget Amendments (2023 totals rounded to the closest $1,000) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) (January 26, 2023, counts as against, Motion Passed (11 to 3))
-
Yea: Amended Budget Amendment Case No. P-17 (Capital Financing — Reduction to a previously approved Infrastructure Gap Reserve Fund contribution) to set the reduction amount at $475,000. (committee stage) — Review of For Consideration Property Tax Operating Budget Amendments (2023 totals rounded to the closest $1,000) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) (January 26, 2023, counts as against, Motion Passed (13 to 1))
-
Yea: Approved Budget Amendment Case No. P-17 (as amended to $475,000): reduced the Infrastructure Gap Reserve Fund contribution under Capital Financing by $475,000, cutting the operating budget and tax levy by the same amount. (committee stage) — Review of For Consideration Property Tax Operating Budget Amendments (2023 totals rounded to the closest $1,000) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) (January 26, 2023, counts as against, Motion Passed (13 to 1))
Show all 75 rows on this axis (64 votes behind this pattern, 11 votes excluded from it, see above) (75 rows across 50 distinct decisions — 47 behind this pattern, 3 excluded from it, see above — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Adopted the by-law limiting the City’s Community Grants Annual Program to capital-only funding for 2026 and 2027. | (4.1) Allocating the City of London Community Grants Annual Stream to Fund Capital Projects Only in the 2026 and 2027 Budget Cycles (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That item 8, clause 4.1, as amended, BE APPROVED. | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Limited the City’s Community Grants Annual Program to the capital-funding category only for 2026 and 2027, ending operating-stream grant funding to community organizations for those two years. | (4.1) Allocating the City of London Community Grants Annual Stream to Fund Capital Projects Only in the 2026 and 2027 Budget Cycles | That the motion BE AMENDED to read as follows: That the attached by-law being a by-law … | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2025-11-26 | Yea | Amended the 2026 budget to increase spending by $784,000 (and the tax levy by the same amount) to provide free two-hour on-street parking via the Honk App in the Core Area. | (4.9) Amendment - Councillor D. Ferreira | That the Mayor’s 2026 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED by increasing the budget to provi… | increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2025-11-20 | Yea | Approved the amended Development Charges exemptions tax-levy-mitigation measure, reducing the 2026 tax levy by $2,400,000. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Budget Case No. P-13 - Councillor S. Stevenson (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2025-11-20 | Yea | Amended the 2026 Annual Budget Update to use previously budgeted 2025 tax-supported Development Charges exemption funding for tax levy mitigation, reducing the 2026 tax levy by $2,400,000. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Budget Case No. P-13 - Councillor S. Stevenson | That the motion BE AMENDED to read as follows: That the Mayor’s Tabled 2026 Annual Budg… | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2025-11-20 | Nay | Would have amended the 2026 Annual Budget Update to redirect a portion of Business Case No. P-20 (2024 Surplus Allocation for Tax Mitigation), $700,000 in each of 2026 and 2027, to increase funding for the Housing Stability Bank program. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Budget Case No. P-20 | That the Mayor’s Tabled 2026 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED by re-directing a portion … | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2025-11-20 | Yea | Excluded Business Case No. P-12 (Resident Satisfaction Survey Frequency) from the Mayor’s Tabled 2026 Annual Budget. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Budget Case No. P-12 - Councillor S. Stevenson | That Business Case No. P-12 Resident Satisfaction Survey Frequency - BE EXCLUDED from the … | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2025-11-20 | Nay | Would have amended the 2026 Annual Budget Update to fund the Housing Stability Bank Program $500,000 ($250,000 for 2026 and $250,000 for 2027) from the Community Investment Reserve Fund. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment – Councillor H. McAlister | That the Mayor’s Tabled 2026 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED in order to fund the Housi… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2025-11-20 | Nay | Would have included Business Case No. P-24 (Eliminate Climate Change Reserve Fund Contribution), a $192,000 reduction in each of 2026 and 2027, in the Mayor’s Tabled 2026 Annual Budget Update. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Budget Case No. P-24 - Councillor S. Stevenson | That Business Case No. P-24 – Eliminate Climate Change Reserve Fund Contribution – BE INCL… | opposed a measure that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (4 to 11) |
| 2025-11-20 | Yea | Included Business Case No. P-25 (Stop Collecting Blue Box Materials from Non-Eligible Sources), a net savings item, in the Mayor’s Tabled 2026 Annual Update Budget. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Budget Case No. P25 - Mayor J. Morgan | That Business Case No. P-25 - Stop Collecting Blue Box Materials from Non-Eligible Sources… | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2025-11-20 | Yea | Excluded Business Case No. P-6 (Reduced Road Network Improvements), worth $114,000 in 2026 and 2027, from the Mayor’s Tabled 2026 Annual Update Budget. (committee stage) | Amendment - Budget Case No. P-6 | That Business Case No. P-6 - Reduced Road Network Improvements - BE EXCLUDED from the Mayo… | increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2025-05-13 | Yea | Directed that the remaining $16.9 million of the 2024 operating budget surplus be retained in the Operating Budget Contingency Reserve and applied evenly in 2026 and 2027 to reduce (mitigate) those years’ tax-levy increases. | (2.4) 2024 Year-End Operating Budget Monitoring Report | Motion to approve part a) iv) 3: iv) Notwithstanding the Surplus/Deficit Policy, Civic … | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2025-03-24 | Nay | Would have directed staff to take no further action on an expanded low-income tax deferral program at this time, citing the Mayor’s direction to keep the 2026 property tax levy increase under 5%. (committee stage) | Consideration for an Updated Low-Income Seniors and Low-Income Persons with Disabilities Tax Deferral Program | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Finance Supports, the following… | opposed a measure that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (2 to 3) |
| 2024-11-22 | Nay | Would have drawn $16,255,000 from the Unfunded Liability Reserve Fund, outside its Council-approved purpose, specifically to reduce the 2025 property tax levy by the same amount. (committee stage) | Amendment - Unfunded Liability Reserve Fund - Councillor S. Stevenson | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED to include a drawdown from the Un… | opposed a measure that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (1 to 13) |
| 2024-11-22 | Yea | In final vote, approved reducing the Economic Development Reserve Fund’s annual contribution by $500,000/year (cutting the tax levy by the same amount), with a one-time $1 million backfill transfer in 2025. (committee stage) | Amendment – Business Case No. P-46 - Councillor S. Stevenson (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, be approved. | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2024-11-22 | Yea | Reduced the annual contribution to the Economic Development Reserve Fund by $500,000/year (cutting the tax levy by the same amount), offset by directing a one-time $1 million transfer from the Community Investment Reserve Fund to the Economic Development Reserve Fund in 2025 only. (committee stage) | Amendment – Business Case No. P-46 - Councillor S. Stevenson | That the motion be amended to read as follows: That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Upda… | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (10 to 4) |
| 2024-11-22 | Yea | Directed the City to fund its increased $226,954 share of the Middlesex-London Health Unit’s 2025 budget from the Operating Budget Contingency Reserve. (committee stage) | Middlesex-London Health Unit 2025 Funding Request | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Finance Supports, the following… | increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (8 to 6) |
| 2024-11-22 | Yea | In final vote, approved the $300,000/year (2025 and 2026) Community-Investment-Reserve-funded grant to the London Downtown Business Association for graffiti removal, power washing, street cleaning, and beautification. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Grant - Economic Development Reserve Fund -Councillor D. Ferreira - LDBA for Graffiti Removal, Power Washing, Expanded Street Cleaning and Beautification and Maintenance (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2024-11-22 | Yea | Would have further amended the LDBA cleaning/beautification grant to fund it at $300,000 for 2025 only, funded from the Community Investment Reserve Fund, rather than the $300,000/year for 2025 and 2026 in the version already on the floor. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Grant - Economic Development Reserve Fund -Councillor D. Ferreira - LDBA for Graffiti Removal, Power Washing, Expanded Street Cleaning and Beautification and Maintenance | That the motion be further amended, to read as follows: That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Bu… | backed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (2 to 12) |
| 2024-11-22 | Yea | Amended the pending grant motion to fund the London Downtown Business Association’s cleaning/beautification grant (graffiti removal, power washing, expanded street cleaning, beautification) at $300,000/year for 2025 and 2026, funded from the Community Investment Reserve Fund instead of the Economic Development Reserve Fund. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Grant - Economic Development Reserve Fund -Councillor D. Ferreira - LDBA for Graffiti Removal, Power Washing, Expanded Street Cleaning and Beautification and Maintenance | That the motion be amended, to read as follows: That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Upd… | increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
| 2024-11-22 | Nay | Would have increased the 2025-2027 budget by $265,000/year to fund a new Economic Development Reserve Fund grant to the London Downtown Business Association for business safety/security improvements, property-damage grants, and CPTED audits. (committee stage) | Security, Property Damage Grants and Crime Prevention | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED by increasing the budget to provi… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (6 to 8) |
| 2024-11-22 | Yea | Reduced the Parks Maintenance Service Enhancements budget line (Business Case P-31) from $827,000 to $808,000 in 2025 operating expenditures and from $560,000 to $221,000 in 2025 capital expenditures, with a matching reduction to the Climate Change Reserve Fund contribution. (committee stage) | Amendment - Budget Case No. P-31 - Councillor and Budget Chair E. Peloza and Councillor S. Franke | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED to adjust Parks Maintenance Servi… | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2024-11-21 | Nay | Would have added $700,000/year in operating funding (and a matching tax-levy increase) for the Housing Stability Bank Expansion program (Business Case P-16). (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Budget Case No. P-16 - Councillor S. Trosow | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED to include funding for the Housin… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2024-11-21 | Nay | Would have removed a previously-proposed pause to the Neighbourhood Decision Making Program, restoring $250,000/year in program funding (and a matching $250,000/year increase to the tax levy). (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Budget Case No. P-3 - Councillor A. Hopkins | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED to remove Budget Amendment No. P-3 –… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2024-11-21 | Nay | Would have removed a previously-proposed $496,000 pause/reduction to the City’s annual Community Grants Program (restoring its funding), offset by an equal $496,000 reduction to the Economic Development Reserve Fund contribution. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Budget Case No. P-2 - Councillor S. Franke | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED to remove Budget Amendment No. P-2 –… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2024-11-21 | Nay | Would have added a larger Parks Maintenance Service Enhancements package (6 temporary staff, $276,000 total per Business Case P-31) to the budget, funded via $213,000 in 2025 capital expenditures. (committee stage) | Amendment - Budget Case No. P-31 - Councillor and Budget Chair E. Peloza and Councillor S. Franke | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED to include Parks Maintenance Serv… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (2 to 13) |
| 2024-11-21 | Nay | Would have added a Parks Maintenance Service Enhancements package (4 temporary staff, $149,000 total per Business Case P-31) to the budget, funded via $213,000 in 2025 capital expenditures. (committee stage) | Amendment - Budget Case No. P-31 - Councillor and Budget Chair E. Peloza and Councillor S. Franke | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED to include Parks Maintenance Serv… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2024-11-21 | Nay | Added a smaller Parks Maintenance Service Enhancements package (2 permanent staff, $214,000 total per Business Case P-31) to the budget, funded via $156,000 in 2025 capital expenditures. (committee stage) | Amendment - Budget Case No. P-31 - Councillor and Budget Chair E. Peloza and Councillor S. Franke | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED to include Parks Maintenance Serv… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2024-11-21 | Nay | Added Parks Maintenance Service Enhancements (5 permanent staff, $613,000 total per Business Case P-31) to the budget, funded via $404,000 in 2025 capital expenditures. (committee stage) | Amendment - Budget Case No. P-31 - Councillor and Budget Chair E. Peloza and Councillor S. Franke | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED to include Parks Maintenance Serv… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2024-08-27 | Yea | Directed a $3,000,000 transfer from the Community Investment Reserve Fund to the Operating Budget Contingency Reserve to support a $1,000,000 property tax-levy reduction in each of the 2025, 2026, and 2027 Annual Budget Updates, and requested the Mayor include that decrease in his budget updates. | (4.2) Tax-Levy Reduction | That notwithstanding the Council approved Surplus/Deficit Policy, the following actions… | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2024-07-23 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to bring forward a budget business case to pause funding for the Neighbourhood Decision Making program for the remainder of the 2025-2027 Multi-Year Budget. | (4.2) 1st Report of the Strategic Opportunities Review Working Group | That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to bring forward a Business Case to the Annua… | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2024-02-29 | Nay | Would have added $700,000 per year (2024-2027) in funding for Business Case No. P-16, a Housing Stability Bank expansion. | (3.31) Business Case No. P-16 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include Business Case No. P-16 … | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2024-02-29 | Nay | Would have added $400,000 per year (2024-2027) in funding for Business Case No. P-15, a Hoarding/Extreme Clean Program. | (3.30) BusinessCase No. P-15 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include Business Case No. P-15 … | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2024-02-29 | Nay | Would have added funding starting in 2026 for an extension of Parks Operations Services under Business Case No. P-31. | (3.9) Business Case No. P-31 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include funding for “Action … | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2024-02-29 | Nay | Would have reversed a proposed 5.4% funding-increase cap on Museum London, restoring it to the higher 6.3% base-budget increase. | (3.4) Adj. No. 4 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Adj. No. 4 – Museum Lond… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2024-02-29 | Yea | Reduced Business Case No. P-46 (Economic and Partnership Initiatives) Action 12 funding by $450,000 per year for 2025-2027. | (3.38) Amendment - Business Case No. P-46 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED by reducing Business Case No. P-46… | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-02-29 | Yea | Would have increased Business Case No. P-46 (Economic and Partnership Initiatives) funding by adding actions 3 and 6, roughly $75,000-$100,000 per year. | (3.38) Amendment - Business Case No. P-46 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED by increasing Business Case No. P-… | backed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (4 to 11) |
| 2024-02-15 | Yea | Would have reduced by $1.8 million per year (2024-2027) the budgeted cost of Business Case No. P-L3, which covers statutory development-charge exemptions under the province’s More Homes Built Faster Act (Bill 23). (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-L3 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED by reducing the funding for Bus… | backed a measure that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (3 to 12) |
| 2024-02-15 | Yea | Added $100,000 in one-time 2024 funding under Business Case No. P-69 to replace high-demand children’s and teen print materials at the London Public Library. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-69 | Motion to approve part b): b) one-time funding of $100,000 in 2024, to be funded from t… | increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2024-02-15 | Yea | Would have added $134,000 total (2024-2027) in ongoing funding under Business Case No. P-69 to expand the London Public Library’s collections purchasing, aimed at underrepresented and diverse-experience publishing. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-69 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include Business Case No. P-69 … | backed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2024-02-15 | Yea | Added $100,000 in Community Investment Reserve Fund capital spending (2025-2026) to expand children’s digital literacy discovery programs, under Business Case No. P-30. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-30 | b) an investment of $100,000 to expand the suite of children’s digital literacy discove… | increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2024-02-15 | Yea | Added $31,000 in Community Investment Reserve Fund capital spending in 2024 to expand the Central Library’s 2nd Floor Creativity Lab, under Business Case No. P-30. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-30 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include Business Case No. P-30 … | increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2024-02-15 | Nay | Would have increased the London Public Library’s 2027 base-budget increase from the Mayor’s proposed 5.2% to 9% (+$3,039,325). (committee stage) | Amendment - London Public Library Base Budget (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve part d), related to 2027: d) 2027: 9% (Mayor’s Budget: 5.2%) 2027 Ope… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2024-02-15 | Nay | Would have increased the London Public Library’s 2026 base-budget increase from the Mayor’s proposed 5.1% to 9% (+$1,876,707). (committee stage) | Amendment - London Public Library Base Budget (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve part c), related to 2026: c) 2026: 9% (Mayor’s Budget: 5.1%) 2026 Ope… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2024-02-15 | Nay | Would have increased the London Public Library’s 2025 base-budget increase from the Mayor’s proposed 6.0% to 8% (+$833,824). (committee stage) | Amendment - London Public Library Base Budget (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve part b), related to 2025: b) 2025: 8% (Mayor’s Budget: 6.0%) 2025 Ope… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2024-02-15 | Yea | Increased the London Public Library’s 2024 base-budget increase from the Mayor’s proposed 5.4% to 7% (+$331,931). (committee stage) | Amendment - London Public Library Base Budget | Motion to approve part a), related to 2024: That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budge… | increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2024-02-15 | Yea | Reduced funding for Business Case No. P-36 (Safe London and Anti-Racism/Anti-Oppression Action Plan) to a flat $125,000 annually, a cut of $58,000 per year. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-36 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED by reducing funding for Busines… | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2024-02-15 | Nay | Would have added $700,000 per year (2024-2027) in funding for Business Case No. P-16, a Housing Stability Bank expansion. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-16 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include Business Case No. P-16 … | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2024-02-15 | Nay | Would have added $400,000 per year (2024-2027) in funding for Business Case No. P-15, a Hoarding/Extreme Clean Program. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-15 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include Business Case No. P-15 … | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2024-02-08 | Nay | Would have removed budgeted funding for two additional Administrative Assistant positions under the Legislative and Council Services business case (P-65). (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-65 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-year Budget BE AMENDED by removing funding for the two… | opposed a measure that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (3 to 12) |
| 2024-02-08 | Nay | Would have added $60,000 in one-time 2024 funding for Board Governance Training under Business Case No. P-40 (Pillar Nonprofit Network capacity-building). (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-40 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include one-time funding in … | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2024-02-08 | Yea | Would have removed entirely the budgeted cost of Business Case No. P-L3, which covers statutory development-charge exemptions under the province’s More Homes Built Faster Act (Bill 23), roughly $1.8 million per year. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-L3 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Business Case No. P-L3 –… | backed a measure that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (2 to 13) |
| 2024-02-02 | Nay | Would have added $316,000 in 2026 funding for Action No. 3 (Extension of Parks Operations Services) under Business Case No. P-31 (Parks Operations Service Delivery Enhancements). (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-31 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include funding for “Action … | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2024-02-02 | Yea | Approved Business Case No. P-26 (Community Gardens Program Expansion to Support Food Security), delayed to 2026, funded partly by a new $12,000 property tax levy in 2026 and 2027. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-26 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include Business Case No. P-26 … | increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2024-02-02 | Yea | Would have removed Business Case No. P-9 (Giwetashkad Implementation) funding from the multi-year budget entirely. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-9 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Business Case # P-9 –… | backed a measure that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (4 to 11) |
| 2024-02-02 | Yea | Reduced the Industrial Lands Reserve Fund contribution by $1 million for 2024 only, lowering the 2024 property tax levy by about 0.1%. (committee stage) | Amendment - Reserve Fund | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to reduce the current Industria… | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2024-02-02 | Nay | Would have reversed a proposed reduction to Museum London’s budget increase, restoring funding to the 6.3% base budget program level instead of the reduced 5.4% average increase. (committee stage) | Amendment - Adj. No. 4 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Adj. No. 4 – Museum Lond… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2024-02-02 | Yea | Reduced Business Case No. P-2 (Vehicle and Equipment Replacement) annual costs by spreading reserve fund repayments over 6 years instead of 5. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-2 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED by reducing Business Case No. P-2 … | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-02-02 | Nay | Would have approved Business Case No. P-63 (Silver Creek Ecological Enhancements) funding, delaying implementation and the $200,000 annual funding until 2026. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-63 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include Business Case No. P-63 … | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2024-02-02 | Yea | Added one-time $65,000 funding for 2024 for Business Case No. P-48 (Canadian Mental Health Transitional Case Worker at the London Public Library), drawn from the Community Investment Reserve Fund. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-48 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include Business Case No. P-48 … | increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2024-02-02 | Yea | Would have added $100,000/year in funding for Business Case No. P-39 (The Grand Theatre – Increasing Community Access to & Participation in the Arts) (re-vote of the same amendment). (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-39 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include funding at $100,000 … | backed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (6 to 8) |
| 2024-02-02 | Yea | Would have added $100,000/year in funding for Business Case No. P-39 (The Grand Theatre – Increasing Community Access to & Participation in the Arts). (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-39 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include funding at $100,000 … | backed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2024-02-02 | Yea | Removed Business Case No. P-34 (City Hall Main Lobby Security Guard) funding from the multi-year budget. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-34 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Business Case No. P-34 –… | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2024-02-02 | Yea | Removed Business Case No. P-27 (Neighbourhood Decision Making Program Expansion) funding from the multi-year budget. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-27 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Business Case No. P-27 –… | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-02-02 | Nay | Would have funded 50% of Initiative 10 under Business Case No. P-42 (5-Year Community Improvement Plan Review Implementation), starting in 2026. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-42 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to fund 50% of Initiative 10 in… | opposed a measure that would have increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (3 to 12) |
| 2024-02-02 | Nay | Would have removed Business Case No. P-38 (City of London Community Arts Investment Program Expansion) funding from the multi-year budget entirely. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-38 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Business Case No. P-38 –… | opposed a measure that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2024-02-02 | Yea | Added a 15% administration fee ($15,000/year) to Business Case No. P-38 (Community Arts Investment Program Expansion) funding. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-38 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include administration fees … | increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2024-02-02 | Nay | Would have removed Business Case No. P-37 (CMHA Holly’s House) funding from the multi-year budget entirely. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-37 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Business Case No. P-37 –… | opposed a measure that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (1 to 14) |
| 2024-02-01 | Nay | Would have removed Business Case No. P-7 (a new Property Tax Software System and Capital Asset Reporting Tool for Financial Reporting) from the multi-year budget. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-7 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Business Case No. P-7 – … | opposed a measure that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (2 to 13) |
| 2023-04-18 | Yea | Advised Civic Administration of Council’s desire for the draft 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget to include an average annual tax-levy increase of approximately 2.9%-3.9% to maintain existing service levels, plus an additional 0.5% for further investment, for planning purposes. (committee stage) | 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget | That part b) BE AMENDED to read as follows: b) the Civic Administration BE ADVISED of t… | increased the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2023-01-26 | Yea | Approved Budget Amendment Case No. P-17 (as amended to $475,000): reduced the Infrastructure Gap Reserve Fund contribution under Capital Financing by $475,000, cutting the operating budget and tax levy by the same amount. (committee stage) | Review of For Consideration Property Tax Operating Budget Amendments (2023 totals rounded to the closest $1,000) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That Budget Amendment Case No. P-17 BE AMENDED to be in the amount of ($ 475,000). | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2023-01-26 | Yea | Amended Budget Amendment Case No. P-17 (Capital Financing — Reduction to a previously approved Infrastructure Gap Reserve Fund contribution) to set the reduction amount at $475,000. (committee stage) | Review of For Consideration Property Tax Operating Budget Amendments (2023 totals rounded to the closest $1,000) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That consideration of Budget Amendment P-15 BE REFERRED to the next multi-year budget p… | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2023-01-26 | Yea | Approved Budget Amendment Case No. P-11: reduced the tax levy and operating budget by $200,000 by cutting Horticulture Aesthetics service levels within Parks and Horticulture. (committee stage) | Review of For Consideration Property Tax Operating Budget Amendments (2023 totals rounded to the closest $1,000) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the following actions be taken with respect to the 2023 Annual Budget Update: b) C… | reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2023-01-26 | Nay | Would have reduced previously approved additional investment in winter maintenance by $740,000 (cutting the operating budget and tax levy by the same amount); failed 5-9. (committee stage) | Review of For Consideration Property Tax Operating Budget Amendments (2023 totals rounded to the closest $1,000) | Motion to approve Budget Amendment Case No. P-10c – Reduce previously approved additional … | opposed a measure that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Failed (5 to 9) |
| 2023-01-26 | Nay | Reduced annual walkway maintenance funding by $60,000 (cutting the operating budget and tax levy by the same amount). (committee stage) | Review of For Consideration Property Tax Operating Budget Amendments (2023 totals rounded to the closest $1,000) | Motion to approve Budget Amendment Case No. P-10b – Reduce annual walkway maintenance – Op… | opposed a measure that would have reduced the tax levy or a budget item | Motion Passed (9 to 5) |
approved the budget item vs. denied the budget item
Only 3 distinct decisions since 2023 (recused 2 (recused from discussing or voting on this item; the reason isn’t recorded in this data)) — too few to describe a pattern. The individual votes are listed below.
Show all 5 rows behind this pattern (3 votes, 2 recusals/absences/other) (5 rows across 4 distinct decisions — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-23 | Nay | Approved the 2023 year-end operating budget monitoring report and funding the London & Middlesex Community Housing operational deficit of about $33,000. | (2.2) 2023 Year-End Operating Budget Monitoring Report (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, without part d), as amended, BE APPROVED. | opposed a measure that would have approved the budget item | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
| 2023-12-06 | Yea | Approved prioritizing the Planning & Development and Building Services area for workplace modernization (subject to multi-year budget deliberation) and approved the source of financing for the additional staff accommodation costs. (committee stage) | Recruitment, Retention and Accommodation of Planning & Development and Building Staff | Motion TO APPROVE the preamble and parts a) and parts b) to read as follows: “That, on … | approved the budget item | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
| 2023-10-31 | Recused | Would have approved a $125,000 one-time grant from the Operating Budget Contingency Reserve to the Hyde Park Business Improvement Association. (committee stage) | October Progress Update - Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response | That, the proposed amendment be amended to include: a) a new part be added to read “tha… | — | Motion Failed (5 to 7) |
| 2023-10-31 | Recused | Approved a $250,000 one-time grant from the Operating Budget Contingency Reserve to the Argyle and Hamilton Road Business Improvement Associations. (committee stage) | October Progress Update - Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response | That, with respect to the October Progress Update – Health & Homelessness Whole of Comm… | — | Motion Passed (8 to 4) |
| 2023-01-26 | Nay | Would have amended Budget Amendment No. P-1 to redirect the $225,000 earmarked for Downtown Tree Planting to tree-planting efforts city-wide instead (same total amount, redirected in scope, not a net levy change); failed 7-7. (committee stage) | Review of Recommended Property Tax Operating Budget Amendments (2023 totals rounded to the closest $1,000) | That Budget Amendment No. P-1 BE AMENDED to re-allocate the $225,000 for Downtown Tree Pla… | opposed a measure that would have approved the budget item | Motion Failed (7 to 7) |
kept people or services at their current location vs. directed relocating people or services away from their current location
Only 1 distinct decision since 2023 — too few to describe a pattern. The individual vote is listed below.
Show all 1 vote behind this pattern
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-18 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to work with Ark Aid Street Mission Inc. to relocate its front-door services off Dundas Street, as part of preparing the 2025 budget amendment. (committee stage) | SS-2024-237 Single Source Award for Year-Round Ark Aid Mission Strategy | That part c) be amended with a new part i) to read as follows: i) Civic Administration … | opposed a measure that would have directed relocating people or services away from their current location | Motion Failed (4 to 8) |
40 motions with no clear direction on this issue (excluded from the pattern counts above; shown for transparency, not as evidence of a position)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-20 | Yea | Would have approved requesting that the Middlesex-London Health Unit submit an additional funding request for 2026 onward for permanent base funding for 2.0 additional FTEs. (committee stage) | Amendment - Budget Case No. P-2 - Councillor S. Stevenson | That the following part BE APPROVED: the Middlesex London Health Unit BE REQUESTED to s… | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2025-07-22 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to include a budget business case to increase the School Crossing Guard Program by $200,000 a year and identify a funding source. | (5.1) Request to Review the School Crossing Guard Program | That the following actions be taken with respect to the communication from Councillor S… | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2025-06-11 | Nay | Would have requested the London & Middlesex Housing Corporation to prepare a business case on pros, cons, costs and funding sources for additional investment in its properties. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Budget Updates Requested by the Mayor and the Budget Chair | That the motion BE AMENDED to add a new part that reads as follows: That the London & M… | Motion Failed (1 to 14) |
| 2025-06-11 | Nay | Would have directed staff to prepare a business case setting out options for reducing the Advisory Committee budget, for Council’s future consideration. (committee stage) | Communication - Cost Savings Opportunities within Advisory Committee Budget - Councillor S. Stevenson | That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to prepare a Business Case for Council’s cons… | Motion Failed (3 to 11) |
| 2025-06-11 | Nay | Would have directed staff to prepare a business case setting out options, cost savings and staffing impacts for reducing the Heritage Department’s budget, for Council’s future consideration. (committee stage) | Communication - Cost Saving Opportunities within Heritage - Councillor S. Stevenson | That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to prepare a Business Case for Council’s cons… | Motion Failed (3 to 12) |
| 2025-06-03 | Nay | Excluded the ‘Reduced Summer Sidewalk Maintenance’ business case from the 2026 Budget Update. | (4.1) 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | d) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business cases in the … | Motion Passed (9 to 5) |
| 2025-06-03 | Nay | Would have excluded three 2026 budget business cases from the update: reduced road-network-improvement planning, ending the multi-residential green bin cart pilot, and stopping blue-box collection from non-eligible sources. | (4.1) 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | d) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business cases in the … | Motion Failed (7 to 7) |
| 2025-05-22 | Nay | Would have referred Councillor Stevenson’s request to review LEDC’s budget for cost-savings opportunities to a future Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee meeting where LEDC is scheduled to appear, rather than deciding it now. (committee stage) | Budget 2026 Cost Savings Opportunities - London Economic Development Corporation (LEDC) Review - Councillor S. Stevenson | That the communication dated May 11, 2025 from Councillor S. Stevenson regarding the bu… | Motion Failed (4 to 10) |
| 2025-05-22 | Yea | Would have excluded the Capital Financing ‘Climate Change Reserve Fund Contribution’ business case (Appendix C, Ref No. 5) from the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business case in the 202… | Motion Failed (7 to 7) |
| 2025-05-22 | Yea | Excluded the Parks & Horticulture ‘Maintenance of Local Road Traffic Circles, Gateway Features and Cul-de-sac Islands’ business case (Appendix C, Ref No. 4) from the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business case in the 202… | Motion Passed (8 to 6) |
| 2025-05-22 | Yea | Excluded the Recycling & Composting ‘Stop Collecting Blue Box Materials from Non-eligible Sources (NES)’ business case (Appendix C, Ref No. 3) from the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business case in the 202… | Motion Passed (10 to 4) |
| 2025-05-22 | Yea | Excluded the Recycling & Composting ‘Stop Multi-Residential Green Bin Cart Pilot Project and Future Expansion’ business case (Appendix C, Ref No. 2) from the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business case in the 202… | Motion Passed (9 to 5) |
| 2025-05-22 | Yea | Would have excluded the Traffic Control & Street Lighting ‘Eliminate Full Funding of New Streetlight Installations’ business case (Appendix C, Ref No. 1) from the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business case in the 202… | Motion Failed (7 to 7) |
| 2025-05-22 | Yea | Would have excluded the Information Technology ‘Digital Transformation’ business case (Appendix B, Ref No. 8) from the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business case in the 202… | Motion Failed (1 to 13) |
| 2025-05-22 | Nay | Would have excluded the Human Resources ‘Internships’ business case (Appendix B, Ref No. 7) from the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business case in the 202… | Motion Failed (1 to 13) |
| 2025-05-22 | Yea | Would have excluded the Corporate Management ‘Resident Satisfaction Survey’ business case (Appendix B, Ref No. 6) from the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business case in the 202… | Motion Failed (4 to 10) |
| 2025-05-22 | Yea | Excluded the Aquatics ‘Closure of 5 Wading Pools’ business case (Appendix B, Ref No. 5) from the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business case in the 202… | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
| 2025-05-22 | Yea | Would have excluded the Urban Forestry ‘Tree Planting Grants & Non-replacement Tree Planting’ business case (Appendix B, Ref No. 4) from the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business case in the 202… | Motion Failed (7 to 7) |
| 2025-05-22 | Yea | Excluded the Urban Forestry ‘Reduction in Pathway and Trail Edge Brush Mulching’ business case (Appendix B, Ref No. 3) from the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business case in the 202… | Motion Passed (8 to 6) |
| 2025-05-22 | Yea | Excluded the ‘Reduced Road Network Improvements’ business case (Appendix B, Ref No. 2) from the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business case in the 202… | Motion Passed (9 to 5) |
| 2025-05-22 | Yea | Excluded the ‘Reduced Summer Sidewalk Maintenance’ business case (Appendix B, Ref No. 1) from the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to exclude the following business case in the 202… | Motion Passed (10 to 4) |
| 2025-05-22 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to proceed with implementing the Appendix A user-fee revenue-generation changes and bring forward the corresponding business case for inclusion in the 2026 Budget Update. (committee stage) | 2026 Annual Budget Update - Status Update | c) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to proceed with implementing the user fee chang… | Motion Passed (10 to 4) |
| 2024-11-05 | Nay | Approved referring the VHA Home HealthCare Extreme Clean Program funding request to the Budget Committee for consideration in the 2025 Budget Update, rather than deciding on it directly. | (3.1) Life*Spin - Property Standards and Tenant Support | That b) be approved and reads as follows: b) the request for funding the VHA Home Healt… | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2024-10-21 | Nay | Approved referring the VHA Home HealthCare Extreme Clean Program funding request to the Budget Committee for consideration in the 2025 Budget Update, per business case P15. (committee stage) | Life*Spin - Property Standards and Tenant Support (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve part b) of the main motion. | Motion Passed (4 to 1) |
| 2024-07-23 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to explore replacing the Neighbourhood Decision Making program with a participatory parks-improvement funding model through the Get Involved program, funded up to $125,000/year for 2025-2027 from the Community Investment Reserve Fund. | (4.2) 1st Report of the Strategic Opportunities Review Working Group | That in lieu of the current Neighbourhood Decision Making Program, the Civic Administra… | Motion Failed (3 to 12) |
| 2024-07-23 | Yea | Approved the 1st Report of the Strategic Opportunities Review Working Group, including capping London Community Grants funding at up to $250,000/year for 2025-2027 pending a program review, plus several directives for staff to report back on other budget, grants, and revenue-generation matters (e.g. municipal golf partnerships, venue naming rights, facility alcohol licensing, the Surplus/Deficit Policy). | (4.2) 1st Report of the Strategic Opportunities Review Working Group | That the following actions be taken with respect to the 1st Report of the Strategic Opp… | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2024-07-18 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to report back in Q1 2025 with potential options for Council’s consideration on the City’s Surplus Deficit Policy — no funding decision itself. (committee stage) | 1st Report of the Strategic Opportunities Review Working Group (SORWG) | That part vi) be approved and reads as follows: vi) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTE… | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2024-07-18 | Yea | Would have directed Civic Administration to explore replacing the Neighbourhood Decision Making program with a participatory parks-improvement funding model through the Get Involved program, funded up to $125,000/year for 2025-2027 from the Community Investment Reserve Fund. (committee stage) | 1st Report of the Strategic Opportunities Review Working Group (SORWG) | That part B) be approved and reads as follows: B) in lieu of the current Neighbourhood … | Motion Failed (7 to 7) |
| 2024-04-23 | Yea | Would have referred the entire 2023 Year-End Operating Budget Monitoring Report to a future Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee meeting; failed, so Council proceeded to decide it directly. | (2.2) 2023 Year-End Operating Budget Monitoring Report | That, notwithstanding the Council Procedure By-law, the motion BE REFERRED to a future … | Motion Failed (3 to 11) |
| 2024-04-23 | Yea | Would have added a request that the Mayor draw $3.5 million from the Community Investment Reserve Fund to offset the 2025 tax-rate increase; failed. | (2.2) 2023 Year-End Operating Budget Monitoring Report | That the motion be amended to include the following: it being noted that the Mayor be r… | Motion Failed (5 to 9) |
| 2024-03-26 | Yea | Asked Civic Administration to report back with cost breakdowns and/or a draft operating budget for the new Highly Supportive Housing Plan program, deciding nothing itself. (committee stage) | London’s Health & Homelessness Whole of Community System Response Proposed Highly Supportive Housing Plan | That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back at a future meeting of the Str… | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2024-03-05 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to add a line item to the 2024 final property tax bill and pamphlet identifying the impact of legislative changes set out in the 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget; this motion failed. | Emergent Motions | That the following actions be taken with respect to the 2024 Tax Policy Expectations: a… | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2024-02-01 | Yea | Removed Business Case No. P-5 (Fire Department Breathing Apparatus and Decontamination) from the current 2024-2027 budget and referred it to the 2028-2031 Multi-Year Budget instead, citing the equipment’s 2031 lifecycle renewal date. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-5 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Business Case No. P-5 – … | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2023-05-30 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to prepare a business case for reducing the frequency of grass cutting on city property (a Reduction Case) for consideration during the 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget deliberations; failed 6-6. (committee stage) | Request for Business Cases for the Multi-Year Budget | Motion to approve part c) ii) c) Reduction Cases: ii) Reduction in frequency of grass c… | Motion Failed (6 to 6) |
| 2023-05-30 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to prepare a business case for the Climate Emergency Action Plan (a New Funding, Existing Strategies item) for consideration during the 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget deliberations; failed 3-9. (committee stage) | Request for Business Cases for the Multi-Year Budget | Motion to approve a) iii) iii) Climate Emergency Action Plan; | Motion Failed (3 to 9) |
| 2023-05-30 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to prepare a business case for an Invasive Species Management Plan (a New Funding, Existing Strategies item) for consideration during the 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget deliberations; failed 3-9. (committee stage) | Request for Business Cases for the Multi-Year Budget | Motion to approve a) ii) ii) Invasive Species Management Plan; | Motion Failed (3 to 9) |
| 2023-05-30 | Yea | Referred part b)i) — the request for a business case on a natural heritage lands purchasing strategy (including infrastructure-project compensation requirements) — to Civic Administration to report back to committee with additional scoping details, rather than deciding on the business-case request now. (committee stage) | Request for Business Cases for the Multi-Year Budget (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve part a) i) That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to prepare busin… | Motion Passed (11 to 1) |
| 2023-03-07 | Nay | Directed Civic Administration to develop a micromobility services business case, including bike share services, for inclusion in the 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget process. | (2.4) Results of the 2022 Bike Share Request for Proposal Process and Next Steps | Motion to approve part b) b) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to develop a micromob… | Motion Passed (8 to 6) |
| 2023-01-26 | Yea | Referred consideration of Budget Amendment Case No. P-15 — a proposed $250,000 increase to the Neighbourhood Decision Making Program — to the next Multi-Year Budget process (2024-2027), rather than deciding it in the 2023 update. (committee stage) | Review of For Consideration Property Tax Operating Budget Amendments (2023 totals rounded to the closest $1,000) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the amended Budget Amendment Case No. P-17, in the amount of ($475,00), BE APPROVED h… | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2023-01-26 | Yea | Referred consideration of Business Case No. P-13 — a proposed $8,000 reduction from eliminating printing of Council agenda materials — to the next Multi-Year Budget process (2024-2027). (committee stage) | Review of For Consideration Property Tax Operating Budget Amendments (2023 totals rounded to the closest $1,000) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That consideration of Business Case No. P-13 - Information Technology - Eliminate Printing… | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
Homelessness & Encampments
Of the 59 divided votes on this issue since 2023 that had a clear direction, this councillor has a recorded position on 57 of them (31 of these are excluded from the pattern counts — see below). 2 absent.
expanded the encampment/homelessness response vs. reduced the encampment/homelessness response
Of 15 divided votes since 2023 where the motion’s effect on this axis was clear, this councillor supported 11 measures that would have expanded the encampment/homelessness response; opposed 1 measure that would have expanded the encampment/homelessness response; supported 2 measures that would have reduced the encampment/homelessness response; opposed 1 measure that would have reduced the encampment/homelessness response (absent 2).
27 votes excluded from the pattern above: this councillor’s recorded votes within each of these 7 decisions pointed in different directions across their stages, so none are counted in the tallies; each is listed here:
-
Yea: Narrowed when the Tier 3 Surge Response warming-centre funding activates, removing the Environment Canada extreme-weather-alert trigger and leaving only the -15/-20-with-windchill temperature trigger. — (4.2) Temporary Warming Centres (February 10, 2026, counts as against, Motion Passed (14 to 1))
-
Yea: Would have added an Environment Canada ice-weather-alert (yellow/orange/red) trigger to the conditions that activate the Tier 3 Surge Response warming-centre funding. — (4.2) Temporary Warming Centres (February 10, 2026, counts as for, Motion Failed (6 to 9))
-
Yea: Approved adjusting the Boyle Memorial Community Centre’s Tier 3 Surge Response morning closing time and providing additional garbage and CIR support as needed. (committee stage) — Temporary Warming Centres (January 26, 2026, counts as for, Motion Passed (4 to 2))
-
Yea: Approved funding to add 70 emergency shelter spaces at Ark Aid’s Cronyn Warner site and increase funding for the Salvation Army’s 18 women’s-only emergency shelter spaces. — (2.11) Additional Emergency Shelter and Day Drop-in Space Update Report (April 1, 2025, counts as for, Motion Passed (13 to 1))
-
Nay: Would have approved a $610,577 single-source procurement to continue limited day drop-in space services at The Ark Aid Street Mission through March 2026; the sub-motion (“That part c) of the motion BE APPROVED”) FAILED 2-2 (McAlister, Trosow in favour; Cuddy, Pribil opposed). (committee stage) — Additional Emergency Shelter and Day Drop-in Space Update Report (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) (March 17, 2025, counts as against, Motion Failed (2 to 2))
-
Nay: Would have added a new part j) barring resting spaces from a Business Improvement Area main street unless Municipal Council specifically approved an exception. — (4.1) Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update (November 5, 2024, counts as for, Motion Failed (7 to 8))
-
Yea: Amended the motion to add a new part j) barring resting spaces from being located on the main street of any Business Improvement Area. — (4.1) Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update (November 5, 2024, counts as against, Motion Passed (9 to 6))
-
Yea: Approved part j) of the motion, barring resting spaces from being located on the main street of any Business Improvement Area. — (4.1) Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update (November 5, 2024, counts as against, Motion Passed (9 to 6))
-
Nay: Would have amended part f) to set a flat 100-metre buffer for future service depot locations, in place of the 50-to-100-metre range in the pending motion. (committee stage) — Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) (October 29, 2024, counts as for, Motion Failed (6 to 9))
-
Yea: Amended part b) to reduce the reallocated basic-needs funding from $141,400 back down to $99,700. (committee stage) — Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update (October 29, 2024, counts as against, Motion Passed (9 to 6))
-
Yea: Approved part b) directing Civic Administration to reallocate up to $99,700 from surplus 2024 Housing Stability Services funding to fund basic needs provision from November 1 through December 31, 2024. (committee stage) — Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update (October 29, 2024, counts as for, Motion Passed (12 to 3))
-
Nay: Approved continuing CMHA-TVAMHS’s Cold Weather Response contracted services at The Coffee House through May 31, 2025, funded by reallocating remaining operational surplus. (committee stage) — Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) (October 29, 2024, counts as against, Motion Passed (8 to 7))
-
Yea: Approved a single-source contract award and reallocated $1,800,000 to fund Ark Aid Street Mission’s Year-Round Stable Responsive Services program serving people experiencing homelessness, from August to December 2024, with options to renew for two additional years. — (4.4) SS-2024-237 Single Source Award for Year-Round Ark Aid Mission Strategy (July 23, 2024, counts as for, Motion Passed (12 to 3))
-
Nay: Would have extended one-time funding of $687,000 to Ark Aid Street Mission Inc. for an additional 61 days (to September 30, 2024) of its stable responsive homelessness services, funded through the Community Investment Reserve Fund. (committee stage) — SS-2024-237 Single Source Award for Year-Round Ark Aid Mission Strategy (July 18, 2024, counts as against, Motion Failed (4 to 9))
-
Yea: Approved a single-source contract award to Ark Aid Street Mission Inc. to provide Year-Round Stable Responsive Services for people experiencing homelessness (August 1-December 31, 2024, with options to renew for two more years), funded in part by reallocating $1.8 million from the Operating Budget Contingency Reserve. (committee stage) — SS-2024-237 Single Source Award for Year-Round Ark Aid Mission Strategy (July 18, 2024, counts as for, Motion Passed (10 to 2))
-
Nay: Would have increased and extended both the London Cares and Safe Space London service agreements (extending to June 30, 2024 and raising funding to $209,400 and $193,500 respectively) beyond what the base motion proposed; this amendment failed. (committee stage) — Contract Amendments to Maintain Day and Overnight Spaces for Unsheltered Londoners (March 5, 2024, counts as against, Motion Failed (4 to 11))
-
Yea: Approved a $139,600 extension of the Purchase of Service Agreement with London Cares to continue temporary drop-in space and security services for unsheltered Londoners through May 31, 2024. (committee stage) — Contract Amendments to Maintain Day and Overnight Spaces for Unsheltered Londoners (March 5, 2024, counts as for, Motion Passed (14 to 1))
-
Yea: Approved a $129,000 extension of the Purchase of Service Agreement with Safe Space London to continue temporary day and overnight drop-in space for unsheltered Londoners through May 31, 2024. (committee stage) — Contract Amendments to Maintain Day and Overnight Spaces for Unsheltered Londoners (March 5, 2024, counts as for, Motion Passed (14 to 1))
-
Yea: Approved (at Council) a $139,600 extension of the Purchase of Service Agreement with London Cares to continue temporary drop-in space and security services for unsheltered Londoners through May 31, 2024. — (2.1) Contract Amendments to Maintain Day and Overnight Spaces for Unsheltered Londoners (March 5, 2024, counts as for, Motion Passed (14 to 1))
-
Yea: Approved (at Council) a $129,000 extension of the Purchase of Service Agreement with Safe Space London to continue temporary day and overnight drop-in space for unsheltered Londoners through May 31, 2024. — (2.1) Contract Amendments to Maintain Day and Overnight Spaces for Unsheltered Londoners (March 5, 2024, counts as for, Motion Passed (14 to 1))
-
Yea: Approved awarding a homelessness-response hub contract to Atlohsa Family Healing Services, funded through the Provincial Homeless Prevention Program and the Fund for Change. — (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) (October 5, 2023, counts as for, Motion Passed (11 to 3))
-
Nay: Approved awarding a homelessness-response hub contract to Youth Opportunities Unlimited, funded through the Provincial Homeless Prevention Program and the Fund for Change. — (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) (October 5, 2023, counts as against, Motion Passed (10 to 4))
-
Nay: Approved awarding a homelessness-response hub contract to Canadian Mental Health Association Thames Valley Addiction and Mental Health Services, funded through the Provincial Homeless Prevention Program and the Fund for Change. — (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) (October 5, 2023, counts as against, Motion Passed (9 to 5))
-
Yea: Approved a one-time contingency funding allocation of up to $1,500,000 from the Social Services Reserve Fund to cover any ineligible costs while finalizing the homelessness hubs’ purchase-of-service contracts. — (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) (October 5, 2023, counts as for, Motion Passed (11 to 3))
-
Yea: Approved introducing the bylaw authorizing execution of purchase-of-service agreements with the three hub providers, finalizing a total operating and capital investment of up to $20,616,024 for the homelessness hubs program. — (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) (October 5, 2023, counts as for, Motion Passed (11 to 3))
-
Yea: Added a one-time $374,210 allocation from the Social Services Reserve Fund to fund security services at London Cares Homeless Response Services’ 602 Queens Avenue and 448 Horton Street locations — (2.3) Housing Stability Services 2023-24 Contract Amendments (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) (July 25, 2023, counts as for, Motion Passed (8 to 7))
-
Yea: Reduced the one-time homelessness-response security funding from $374,210 (the immediately prior amendment) down to $200,000, for London Cares Homeless Response Services’ 602 Queens Avenue and 448 Horton Street locations — (2.3) Housing Stability Services 2023-24 Contract Amendments (July 25, 2023, counts as against, Motion Passed (11 to 4))
Show all 44 rows on this axis (15 votes behind this pattern, 27 votes excluded from it, see above, 2 recusals/absences/other) (44 rows across 20 distinct decisions — 12 behind this pattern, 7 excluded from it, see above — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-13 | Yea | Approved implementing the 2026-2027 Winter Response plan and approved up to $2,152,275 in additional financing from the Operating Budget Contingency Reserve to fund it, and directed a business case for future winter response funding. (committee stage) | Proposed Winter Response for 2026-2027 (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That parts b), c) and d) of the motion BE APPROVED. | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (4 to 1) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Would have added an Environment Canada ice-weather-alert (yellow/orange/red) trigger to the conditions that activate the Tier 3 Surge Response warming-centre funding. | (4.2) Temporary Warming Centres | That part b) BE FURTHER AMENDED: or when Environment Canada issues an extreme weather a… | backed a measure that would have expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Narrowed when the Tier 3 Surge Response warming-centre funding activates, removing the Environment Canada extreme-weather-alert trigger and leaving only the -15/-20-with-windchill temperature trigger. | (4.2) Temporary Warming Centres | That part b) BE AMENDED to read as follows: b) ACTIVATE the Tier 3 Surge Response with … | reduced the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2026-01-26 | Yea | Approved adjusting the Boyle Memorial Community Centre’s Tier 3 Surge Response morning closing time and providing additional garbage and CIR support as needed. (committee stage) | Temporary Warming Centres | That part d) of the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (4 to 2) |
| 2025-10-14 | Yea | Approved funding from the Operating Budget Contingency Reserve to cover the Micro-Modular Shelter Site’s costs through April 2027. | (4.1) Micro-Modular Shelter Site | That part d) of the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-10-08 | Yea | Authorized Civic Administration to finalize 1710 Wilton Grove Road as the site for an up-to-2-year temporary Micro-Modular Shelter, subject to obtaining required permits and approvals. (committee stage) | Micro-Modular Shelter Site (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part b) of the motion BE APPROVED. | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (5 to 1) |
| 2025-09-23 | Nay | Would have paused new placements of high-acuity individuals into the ‘Project Home’ program until Council received and reviewed a report back on program issues. | Councillor S. Stevenson - Urgent Situation Within London’s Housing Stability Program | That the motion be amended to include a new part e) to read as follows: e) pause any ne… | opposed a measure that would have reduced the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2025-07-22 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to allocate up to 30% of the 2025 municipal rent-supplement increase ($1 million annually) to Atlohsa Family Healing Services to administer portable housing benefits for Indigenous-identifying individuals experiencing homelessness through Atlohsa’s Housing First and Rapid Rehousing programs, and to pursue expanded partnerships with other Indigenous-led housing providers. | (2.11) Municipal Rental Assistance Program Allocation for Indigenous Led Housing Supports | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Health and Social Development, … | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-06-09 | Yea | Directed the City to allocate up to 30% of the municipal rent supplement increase to Atlohsa Family Healing Services to deliver housing benefits for Indigenous individuals experiencing homelessness. (committee stage) | Communication - City of London’s Municipal Rent Assistance Program (MRAP) - Councillor D. Ferreira | That the following actions be taken with respect to the communication, dated June 2, 20… | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (4 to 1) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Approved funding to add 70 emergency shelter spaces at Ark Aid’s Cronyn Warner site and increase funding for the Salvation Army’s 18 women’s-only emergency shelter spaces. | (2.11) Additional Emergency Shelter and Day Drop-in Space Update Report | That the following actions be taken with respect to the staff report, dated March 17, 2… | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Added McCormick Park to the City’s list of areas where encampments are not permitted and where outreach will not be provided. | (2.9) Provision of Outdoor Basic Needs | Motion to add a new part j): j) Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to add McCormick Park … | reduced the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2025-03-17 | Nay | Would have approved a $610,577 single-source procurement to continue limited day drop-in space services at The Ark Aid Street Mission through March 2026; the sub-motion (“That part c) of the motion BE APPROVED”) FAILED 2-2 (McAlister, Trosow in favour; Cuddy, Pribil opposed). (committee stage) | Additional Emergency Shelter and Day Drop-in Space Update Report (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part c) of the motion BE APPROVED. | opposed a measure that would have expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Failed (2 to 2) |
| 2025-02-11 | Absent | Approved extending funding agreements with Atlohsa Family Healing Services to temporarily expand indigenous-led outreach supports and services. | (2.5) Unsheltered Homelessness Encampment Initiative and Incremental Reaching Home Funding Allocations | That parts f) and g) BE APPROVED: f) an extension to the existing Municipal Purchase of… | — | Motion Passed (9 to 3) |
| 2025-02-11 | Absent | Would have directed Civic Administration to find $157,860 in funding for the Ark Aid Street Mission to provide 10 supported-housing spaces on Oxford Street; the motion failed. | (2.5) Unsheltered Homelessness Encampment Initiative and Incremental Reaching Home Funding Allocations | That part e), as amended, BE APPROVED: e) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to find … | — | Motion Failed (3 to 9) |
| 2024-11-19 | Yea | Amended part c) to end continued transactional service delivery at existing service depot locations on a fixed date, February 28, 2025, in place of open-ended continuation pending further Council direction. (committee stage) | Service Depot Location Update Report (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion be further amended in part c) to include “until February 28, 2025” and … | reduced the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2024-11-05 | Yea | Approved part j) of the motion, barring resting spaces from being located on the main street of any Business Improvement Area. | (4.1) Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update | That part j) of the motion BE APPROVED: j) resting spaces to NOT BE LOCATED on the main… | reduced the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2024-11-05 | Yea | Amended the motion to add a new part j) barring resting spaces from being located on the main street of any Business Improvement Area. | (4.1) Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update | That the motion be amended to add a new part to read as follows: j) resting spaces to N… | reduced the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2024-11-05 | Nay | Would have added a new part j) barring resting spaces from a Business Improvement Area main street unless Municipal Council specifically approved an exception. | (4.1) Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update | That the motion be amended to add a new part be further amended to read as follows: j) … | opposed a measure that would have reduced the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2024-10-29 | Nay | Approved continuing CMHA-TVAMHS’s Cold Weather Response contracted services at The Coffee House through May 31, 2025, funded by reallocating remaining operational surplus. (committee stage) | Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part h) of the motion be approved: h) continuation of contracted services at the C… | opposed a measure that would have expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2024-10-29 | Yea | Approved part b) directing Civic Administration to reallocate up to $99,700 from surplus 2024 Housing Stability Services funding to fund basic needs provision from November 1 through December 31, 2024. (committee stage) | Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update | That part b) of the motion, as amended, be approved: b) the Civic Administration BE DIR… | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2024-10-29 | Yea | Amended part b) to reduce the reallocated basic-needs funding from $141,400 back down to $99,700. (committee stage) | Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update | That part b) of the motion be further amended to change funding amount from $141,400 to… | reduced the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2024-10-29 | Nay | Would have amended part f) to set a flat 100-metre buffer for future service depot locations, in place of the 50-to-100-metre range in the pending motion. (committee stage) | Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part f) of the motion be further amended to indicate “with a buffer of 100 metres” | opposed a measure that would have reduced the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2024-07-23 | Yea | Approved a single-source contract award and reallocated $1,800,000 to fund Ark Aid Street Mission’s Year-Round Stable Responsive Services program serving people experiencing homelessness, from August to December 2024, with options to renew for two additional years. | (4.4) SS-2024-237 Single Source Award for Year-Round Ark Aid Mission Strategy | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Social and Health Development, … | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2024-07-18 | Yea | Approved a single-source contract award to Ark Aid Street Mission Inc. to provide Year-Round Stable Responsive Services for people experiencing homelessness (August 1-December 31, 2024, with options to renew for two more years), funded in part by reallocating $1.8 million from the Operating Budget Contingency Reserve. (committee stage) | SS-2024-237 Single Source Award for Year-Round Ark Aid Mission Strategy | That the motion be approved, as amended and reads as follows: That, on the recommendati… | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (10 to 2) |
| 2024-07-18 | Nay | Would have extended one-time funding of $687,000 to Ark Aid Street Mission Inc. for an additional 61 days (to September 30, 2024) of its stable responsive homelessness services, funded through the Community Investment Reserve Fund. (committee stage) | SS-2024-237 Single Source Award for Year-Round Ark Aid Mission Strategy | That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to extend one-time funding in the amount of $… | opposed a measure that would have expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Failed (4 to 9) |
| 2024-06-18 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to continue running the depot meal program (a basic-needs service) until Council approves the full Basic Needs Response Plan, and to identify a funding source, including unspent Operating Budget Contingency Reserve funds. (committee stage) | Basic Needs Response Plan | That the referral BE AMENDED to include a new part to read as follows: that Civic Admin… | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-03-05 | Yea | Approved (at Council) a $129,000 extension of the Purchase of Service Agreement with Safe Space London to continue temporary day and overnight drop-in space for unsheltered Londoners through May 31, 2024. | (2.1) Contract Amendments to Maintain Day and Overnight Spaces for Unsheltered Londoners | Motion to approve part b) to read as follows: b) an extension to the existing Municipal… | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-03-05 | Yea | Approved (at Council) a $139,600 extension of the Purchase of Service Agreement with London Cares to continue temporary drop-in space and security services for unsheltered Londoners through May 31, 2024. | (2.1) Contract Amendments to Maintain Day and Overnight Spaces for Unsheltered Londoners | Motion to approve part a) to read as follows: a) an extension to the existing Municipal… | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-03-05 | Yea | Approved a $129,000 extension of the Purchase of Service Agreement with Safe Space London to continue temporary day and overnight drop-in space for unsheltered Londoners through May 31, 2024. (committee stage) | Contract Amendments to Maintain Day and Overnight Spaces for Unsheltered Londoners | Motion to approve part b) to read as follows: b) an extension to the existing Municipal… | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-03-05 | Yea | Approved a $139,600 extension of the Purchase of Service Agreement with London Cares to continue temporary drop-in space and security services for unsheltered Londoners through May 31, 2024. (committee stage) | Contract Amendments to Maintain Day and Overnight Spaces for Unsheltered Londoners | Motion to approve part a) to read as follows: a) an extension to the existing Municipal… | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-03-05 | Nay | Would have increased and extended both the London Cares and Safe Space London service agreements (extending to June 30, 2024 and raising funding to $209,400 and $193,500 respectively) beyond what the base motion proposed; this amendment failed. (committee stage) | Contract Amendments to Maintain Day and Overnight Spaces for Unsheltered Londoners | Motion to amend part a) to change the contract extension end date to be June 30, 2024 a… | opposed a measure that would have expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Failed (4 to 11) |
| 2024-02-06 | Yea | Approved (as amended) single-source Housing Stability Services procurement contracts and associated reserve-fund drawdown, and authorized continued engagement with the Encampment Reference Table on an inclement-weather response plan. (committee stage) | SS-2024-042: Housing Stability Services Single Source (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That item 2.2, as amended, BE APPROVED. | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2023-11-07 | Yea | Approved several 2023-24 Cold Weather Response funding items, including a $523,552 funding increase to CMHA Thames Valley’s drop-in space agreement, one-time security funding for London Cares and CMHA sites, a $638,000 Ark Aid Street Mission contract, a $259,000 Safe Space London contract, and $100,000 to support costs of the response for those who will remain unsheltered. | (2.3) Community Cold Weather Response (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve item 6 (2.3) parts c), d), e), g), h), j), as amended. | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2023-10-31 | Yea | Approved several 2023-24 Cold Weather Response funding items, including a $350,000 funding increase to CMHA Thames Valley’s drop-in space agreement, one-time security funding for London Cares and CMHA sites, a $638,000 Ark Aid Street Mission contract, a $259,000 Safe Space London contract, and $100,000 to support costs of the response for those who will remain unsheltered. (committee stage) | Community Cold Weather Response | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Social and Health Development, … | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (12 to 1) |
| 2023-10-05 | Yea | Approved introducing the bylaw authorizing execution of purchase-of-service agreements with the three hub providers, finalizing a total operating and capital investment of up to $20,616,024 for the homelessness hubs program. | (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) | That part i) and the “it being noted” portions of the recommendation, BE APPROVED: i) t… | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2023-10-05 | Yea | Approved a one-time contingency funding allocation of up to $1,500,000 from the Social Services Reserve Fund to cover any ineligible costs while finalizing the homelessness hubs’ purchase-of-service contracts. | (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) | That part d) of the recommendation BE APPROVED: d) a one-time funding allocation of up … | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2023-10-05 | Nay | Approved awarding a homelessness-response hub contract to Canadian Mental Health Association Thames Valley Addiction and Mental Health Services, funded through the Provincial Homeless Prevention Program and the Fund for Change. | (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) | That part c) of the recommendation BE APPROVED: c) a portion of the Request for Proposa… | opposed a measure that would have expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (9 to 5) |
| 2023-10-05 | Nay | Approved awarding a homelessness-response hub contract to Youth Opportunities Unlimited, funded through the Provincial Homeless Prevention Program and the Fund for Change. | (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) | That part b) of the recommendation BE APPROVED: b) a portion of the Request for Proposa… | opposed a measure that would have expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (10 to 4) |
| 2023-10-05 | Yea | Approved awarding a homelessness-response hub contract to Atlohsa Family Healing Services, funded through the Provincial Homeless Prevention Program and the Fund for Change. | (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) | That part a) of the recommendation BE APPROVED: That, on the recommendation of the Depu… | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2023-09-26 | Yea | Approved a one-time funding allocation of up to $174,210 for London Cares Homeless Response Services to support security services at two locations, plus endorsed additional safety programming within existing budgets. | (4.1) Community and Neighbourhood Safety and Security Concerns Options for Agencies, Staff, Volunteers and those Accessing Services (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That Item 5 (4.1), as amended, BE APPROVED. | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2023-09-26 | Yea | Amended the motion to broaden where the endorsed safety and security programs (additional Coordinated Informed Response programming and street cleaning, within existing Housing Stability Services budgets) apply, from the Old East Village area to all hotspot service request areas. | (4.1) Community and Neighbourhood Safety and Security Concerns Options for Agencies, Staff, Volunteers and those Accessing Services | That part c) of the clause BE AMENDED to read as follows: “c) the additional programs i… | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2023-09-25 | Nay | Approved awarding RFP 2023-199 hub contracts to Atlohsa, Youth Opportunities Unlimited, and CMHA Thames Valley, for a total operating and capital investment of up to $20,616,024, funded through the Provincial Homeless Prevention Program, the Fund for Change, and other sources. (committee stage) | Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Social and Health Development, … | opposed a measure that would have expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2023-07-25 | Yea | Reduced the one-time homelessness-response security funding from $374,210 (the immediately prior amendment) down to $200,000, for London Cares Homeless Response Services’ 602 Queens Avenue and 448 Horton Street locations | (2.3) Housing Stability Services 2023-24 Contract Amendments | That the amendment, as amended, BE APPROVED as follows: That the motion BE FURTHER AMEN… | reduced the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2023-07-25 | Yea | Added a one-time $374,210 allocation from the Social Services Reserve Fund to fund security services at London Cares Homeless Response Services’ 602 Queens Avenue and 448 Horton Street locations | (2.3) Housing Stability Services 2023-24 Contract Amendments (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | f) a one-time funding allocation of up to $374,210 from the Social Services Reserve Fun… | expanded the encampment/homelessness response | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
approved the encampment/homelessness item vs. denied the encampment/homelessness item
Of 9 divided votes since 2023 where the motion’s effect on this axis was clear, this councillor supported 9 measures that would have approved the encampment/homelessness item. No motion on this axis since 2023 would have denied the encampment/homelessness item — every direction-bearing motion here would have approved the encampment/homelessness item.
Show all 9 votes behind this pattern (9 rows across 7 distinct decisions — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | Yea | Endorsed the London and Middlesex Housing Stability Action Plan (2026-2031), the city’s homeless prevention and housing plan, and directed its submission to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and circulation to community partners. | (2.4) Housing Stability Action Plan (2026-2031) Update | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Social and Health Development a… | approved the encampment/homelessness item | Motion Passed (12 to 1) |
| 2024-03-26 | Yea | Endorsed London’s Highly Supportive Housing Plan (Schedule 1) as the city’s approach to its Health & Homelessness Whole of Community System Response. (committee stage) | London’s Health & Homelessness Whole of Community System Response Proposed Highly Supportive Housing Plan | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Social and Health Development, … | approved the encampment/homelessness item | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2023-07-25 | Yea | Endorsed the Whole of Community System Response’s Proposed Hubs Implementation Plan for addressing homelessness. | London’s Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response Proposed Hubs Implementation Plan | That part a) of the motion BE APPROVED: That the following actions be taken with respec… | approved the encampment/homelessness item | Motion Passed (10 to 4) |
| 2023-07-24 | Yea | Endorsed the Whole of Community System Response’s Proposed Hubs Implementation Plan for addressing homelessness. (committee stage) | London’s Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response Proposed Hubs Implementation Plan | Motion to approve part a): That the following actions be taken with respect to the Lond… | approved the encampment/homelessness item | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2023-06-27 | Yea | Approved a $255,000 funding allocation from the Social Services Reserve Fund and a $100,000 contract amendment with London Cares and CMHA to support the Phase 1 Encampment Response. | (4.3) Encampment Response Update | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Social and Health Development, … | approved the encampment/homelessness item | Motion Passed (12 to 1) |
| 2023-06-13 | Yea | Approved a $255,000 funding allocation from the Social Services Reserve Fund and a $100,000 contract amendment with London Cares and CMHA to support the Phase 1 Encampment Response. (committee stage) | Encampment Response Update | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Social and Health Development, … | approved the encampment/homelessness item | Motion Passed (4 to 1) |
| 2023-03-28 | Yea | Amended the Housing and Homelessness strategic-area-of-focus section of the Draft 2023-2027 Strategic Plan (Outcome 3, Expected Result 3.1) to add a new Draft Strategy: applying an equity tool that considers people experiencing mobility poverty, consistent with The London Plan. (committee stage) | Council’s Draft 2023-2027 Strategic Plan | That, the Strategic Area of Focus: Housing and Homelessness, Outcome 3, Expected Result… | approved the encampment/homelessness item | Motion Passed (9 to 5) |
| 2023-03-08 | Yea | Amended the Draft 2023-2027 Strategic Plan’s Housing and Homelessness section: removed Expected Result 2.4 (Outcome 2) and added a new Draft Strategy directing ‘a program of proactive rental property compliance blitzes to protect the health and safety of tenants’ under Outcome 1, Expected Result 1.1. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Council’s Draft 2023-2027 Strategic Plan | That, the Strategic Area of Focus: Housing and Homelessness, Outcome 2, Expected Result… | approved the encampment/homelessness item | Motion Passed (8 to 4) |
| 2023-02-14 | Yea | Approved introducing the by-law adopting the standard-form Municipal Purchase of Service Agreement for buying homeless-prevention and housing-stability services, and delegated authority to the Deputy City Manager, Social and Health Development to execute and amend such agreements within existing budget and without increasing the City’s indebtedness. | (2.9) Housing Stability Services Purchase of Service Agreement Template (Relates to Bill No. 52) | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Social and Health Development, … | approved the encampment/homelessness item | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
kept people or services at their current location vs. directed relocating people or services away from their current location
Only 1 distinct decision since 2023 (2 recorded votes across it) — too few to describe a pattern. The individual votes are listed below.
4 votes excluded from the pattern above: this councillor’s recorded votes within this decision pointed in different directions across its stages, so none are counted in the tallies; each is listed here:
- Yea: Would have approved funding for Ark Aid’s day drop-in program on condition it operate at a location other than a Main Street Business Improvement Area, rather than continuing at its Main Street location. (amendment) — (2.11) Additional Emergency Shelter and Day Drop-in Space Update Report (April 1, 2025, counts as against, Motion Failed (5 to 9))
- Nay: Would have approved funding for Ark Aid’s day drop-in program to remain at its current location only until August 31, 2025, after which it must move to a location other than a Main Street Business Improvement Area. (amendment) — (2.11) Additional Emergency Shelter and Day Drop-in Space Update Report (April 1, 2025, counts as for, Motion Failed (5 to 9))
- Nay: Approved funding to continue Ark Aid’s limited day drop-in space at its existing location, with no requirement to relocate. (amendment) — (2.11) Additional Emergency Shelter and Day Drop-in Space Update Report (April 1, 2025, counts as against, Motion Passed (9 to 5))
- Nay: Approved funding to continue Ark Aid’s limited day drop-in space at its existing location, with no requirement to relocate. (approval of the part) — (2.11) Additional Emergency Shelter and Day Drop-in Space Update Report (April 1, 2025, counts as against, Motion Passed (11 to 3))
Show all 6 rows on this axis (2 votes behind this pattern, 4 votes excluded from it, see above) (6 rows across 2 distinct decisions — 1 behind this pattern, 1 excluded from it, see above — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-22 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to relocate people living unhoused out of Watson Park so the park complies with established encampment protocols, while connecting them to service supports including possible shelter options. | (5.1) Watson Park | That the following actions be taken with respect to Watson Park: a) the Civic Administr… | directed relocating people or services away from their current location | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-04-22 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to relocate people living unhoused out of Watson Park so the park complies with established encampment protocols, while connecting them to service supports including possible shelter options. | (5.1) Watson Park | That part a) be amended to read as follows: a) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to … | directed relocating people or services away from their current location | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-04-01 | Nay | Approved funding to continue Ark Aid’s limited day drop-in space at its existing location, with no requirement to relocate. | (2.11) Additional Emergency Shelter and Day Drop-in Space Update Report | c) a Single Source Procurement BE APPROVED at a total estimated cost of up to $610,577 … | opposed a measure that would have kept people or services at their current location | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2025-04-01 | Nay | Approved funding to continue Ark Aid’s limited day drop-in space at its existing location, with no requirement to relocate. | (2.11) Additional Emergency Shelter and Day Drop-in Space Update Report | That the motion be amended to include a part c) to read as follows: c) a Single Source … | opposed a measure that would have kept people or services at their current location | Motion Passed (9 to 5) |
| 2025-04-01 | Nay | Would have approved funding for Ark Aid’s day drop-in program to remain at its current location only until August 31, 2025, after which it must move to a location other than a Main Street Business Improvement Area. | (2.11) Additional Emergency Shelter and Day Drop-in Space Update Report | That the motion be further amended with the following: c) a Single Source Procurement B… | opposed a measure that would have directed relocating people or services away from their current location | Motion Failed (5 to 9) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Would have approved funding for Ark Aid’s day drop-in program on condition it operate at a location other than a Main Street Business Improvement Area, rather than continuing at its Main Street location. | (2.11) Additional Emergency Shelter and Day Drop-in Space Update Report | That the motion be amended to add a new part c): c) a Single Source Procurement BE APPR… | backed a measure that would have directed relocating people or services away from their current location | Motion Failed (5 to 9) |
71 motions with no clear direction on this issue (excluded from the pattern counts above; shown for transparency, not as evidence of a position)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-21 | Yea | Referred the entire 2026-2027 Winter Response staff report — including implementation and up to $2,152,275 in contingency-reserve financing — to the next Community and Protective Services Committee meeting, to allow more time for discussions with federal partners on funding before a decision. | (2.3) Proposed Winter Response for 2026-2027 | That the staff report dated July 13, 2026, regarding the Proposed Winter Response for 2… | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2026-07-21 | Yea | Referred part c) of the Housing Stability Services motion — implementing the updated emergency shelter guidelines — to the next Community and Protective Services Committee meeting for a further staff report on the changes and how they support housing stability and shelter safety. | (2.4) Housing Stability Services Procurement and Delivery Framework | That part c) of the motion BE REFERRED to the next meeting of the Community and Protect… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Referred the System Area Update on supports for those living unsheltered to a future Community and Protective Services Committee meeting, for a report on the feasibility of a contract extension with 519Pursuit Umbrella Relief Programs for outdoor basic-needs outreach. | (2.3) System Area Update: Supports for Those Living Unsheltered: Basic Needs and Pathway Options | That, the staff report dated January 26, 2026 with respect to the System Area Update: S… | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Would have shortened the Housing Stability Services procurement framework’s initial term from the proposed multi-year length to a one-year contract with an option to renew for one additional year. | (2.2) Good Neighbour Agreements | i) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to provide a one-year contract renewal for the … | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Endorsed the City’s proposed system-transformation approach and multi-year Housing Stability Services procurement framework. | (2.2) Good Neighbour Agreements | a) the proposed system transformation approach and multi-year Housing Stability Service… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2026-02-10 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to review existing housing stability contracts for alignment with operational needs and report back to Council on recommended amendments. | (2.2) Good Neighbour Agreements | ii) that Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to review existing housing stability contract… | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2026-02-10 | Yea | Shortened the Housing Stability Services procurement framework’s initial term from the proposed multi-year length to a one-year contract with an option to renew for one additional year. | (2.2) Good Neighbour Agreements | That part a) of the motion BE AMENDED as follows: i) the Civic Administration BE DIRECT… | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2026-01-26 | Nay | Would have included costing an expanded Tier 2 Surge Response (50 additional warming spaces at -5C) among the scenarios Civic Administration must investigate and report back on. (committee stage) | Temporary Warming Centres | That part e) vi) of the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Failed (3 to 3) |
| 2026-01-26 | Yea | Included costing a lower Tier 3 Surge Response activation threshold (-10C instead of -15C/-20C windchill) as one of the scenarios Civic Administration must investigate and report back on. (committee stage) | Temporary Warming Centres | That part e) v) of the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (5 to 1) |
| 2026-01-26 | Yea | Included providing a minimum of 100 warming-centre spaces across two to four locations as one of the costed scenarios Civic Administration must investigate and report back on. (committee stage) | Temporary Warming Centres | That part e) iii) of the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (4 to 2) |
| 2026-01-26 | Nay | Included establishing one 24/7 warming centre (December 2026-March 2027) as one of the costed scenarios Civic Administration must investigate and report back on. (committee stage) | Temporary Warming Centres | That part e) ii) of the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (4 to 2) |
| 2026-01-26 | Nay | Would have approved the Homeless Prevention Service Standards regarding Good Neighbour and Community Relations. (committee stage) | Good Neighbour Agreements | That part b) of the motion BE APPROVED. | Motion Failed (1 to 5) |
| 2026-01-26 | Nay | Endorsed the proposed system-transformation approach and multi-year Housing Stability Services procurement framework. (committee stage) | Good Neighbour Agreements | That part a) of the motion BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (4 to 2) |
| 2026-01-26 | Yea | Would have amended the Housing Stability Services procurement framework to add a one-year (plus option) contract renewal and a directed review of existing housing-stability contracts with a report back to Council. (committee stage) | Good Neighbour Agreements | That part a) of the motion BE AMENDED as follows: i) the Civic Administration BE DIRECT… | Motion Failed (2 to 4) |
| 2025-12-09 | Nay | Adopted a resolution calling on the Government of Ontario to declare a state of emergency over the homelessness, addictions, and mental-health crisis and to provide municipalities with additional funding and support. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Request to Declare State of Emergency regarding the Community Safety and Humanitarian Crisis - Councillor C. Rahman | That the following actions BE ADOPTED with respect to the communication dated December … | Motion Passed (10 to 2) |
| 2025-12-09 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to consult with first responders (paramedics, police, fire) on emergency services at the Micro-Modular Shelter Site and report back. (committee stage) | Micro-Modular Shelter Site Update | That part d) of the motion be approved: d) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to cons… | Motion Failed (5 to 9) |
| 2025-12-09 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to consult with service providers on their roles, responsibilities, and costs at the Micro-Modular Shelter Site and report back. (committee stage) | Micro-Modular Shelter Site Update | That part c) of the motion be approved: c) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to cons… | Motion Failed (5 to 9) |
| 2025-10-14 | Nay | Would have made a wording-only edit to the Micro-Modular Shelter Site motion, changing ‘regarding’ to ‘with the’ in the briefing-note clause; it did not change the site, funding, or timeline decisions. | (4.1) Micro-Modular Shelter Site | That the motion be further amended in part i) by changing “regarding” to “with the” bef… | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2025-10-14 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to report back to a future Community and Protective Services Committee meeting with the homelessness-response metrics previously requested at an October 2024 Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee meeting. | (3.1) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response Research and Evaluation Report | That the motion be amended to include a new part that reads as follows: The Civic Admin… | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2025-09-23 | Yea | Adopted the amended item directing Civic Administration to report back to a future Community and Protective Services Committee meeting with an overview of placement barriers, success-rate data, and recommendations for strengthening tenant placement processes in the Housing Stability Program, without pausing any new ‘Project Home’ placements (a separate amendment to pause placements had already failed). | Councillor S. Stevenson - Urgent Situation Within London’s Housing Stability Program (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to take the following steps and report back to a … | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2025-09-23 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to report back with an update on tenants’ overall housing-stability success rates and trends among those repeatedly cycling through the programs. | Councillor S. Stevenson - Urgent Situation Within London’s Housing Stability Program | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to take the following steps and report back to a … | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2025-09-23 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to propose recommendations to amend existing housing-placement contracts to address barriers identified in part a), including potential head-lease requirements and strengthened landlord-responsibility language. | Councillor S. Stevenson - Urgent Situation Within London’s Housing Stability Program | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to take the following steps and report back to a … | Motion Failed (3 to 12) |
| 2025-09-23 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to report back with an overview of issues partner social agencies identified as barriers to successful housing placements under London’s Housing Stability Program. | Councillor S. Stevenson - Urgent Situation Within London’s Housing Stability Program | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to take the following steps and report back to a … | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2025-05-13 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to discontinue the Whole of Community System Response quarterly written report and replace it with a more robust, publicly accessible homelessness-data dashboard. | (2.2) Whole of Community System Response Q1 2025 Quarterly Report | That part a) of item 5, clause 2.2, as amended, BE APPROVED: That the following actions… | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2025-05-13 | Yea | Directed staff to report back to the Community and Protective Services Committee in Q2 2025 with the content and rollout plan for a new public homelessness-data dashboard — a request for information, not a funding or policy decision. | (2.2) Whole of Community System Response Q1 2025 Quarterly Report | That part b) of the motion be amended to read as follows: b) the Civic Administration B… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-04-22 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to shut down the fixed Watson Park depot and shift to a mobile service model, with depot resources redirected to help people living unhoused find shelter or move to another location. | (5.1) Watson Park | That the following actions be taken with respect to Watson Park: b) the Civic Administr… | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2025-04-07 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to shut down the fixed Watson Park depot and shift to a mobile service model, with depot resources redirected to help people living unhoused find shelter or move to another location. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Watson Park (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part b) of the motion be approved. | Motion Passed (3 to 2) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Gave final approval, as amended, to the full outdoor-basic-needs report — new/expanded washroom, water, meals, and outreach funding and contracts for Ark Aid, 519Pursuit, and London Cares — bundled together with the separately-added bar on encampments and outreach at McCormick Park. | (2.9) Provision of Outdoor Basic Needs (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Item 10, clause 2.9, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2025-03-17 | Yea | Added a requirement that Civic Administration report back to the committee with the executed outdoor-basic-needs contracts, for information. (committee stage) | Provision of Outdoor Basic Needs | That the motion be amended to include a new part g) to read as follows: The Civic Admin… | Motion Passed (3 to 1) |
| 2025-02-11 | Absent | Referred part b) — a proposed funding increase to continue 70 emergency shelter spaces at Ark Aid — to Civic Administration to report back on potential emergency shelter and drop-in space options. | (2.5) Unsheltered Homelessness Encampment Initiative and Incremental Reaching Home Funding Allocations | Motion to refer part b): that part b) relating to an amendment to the existing Municipa… | Motion Passed (8 to 4) |
| 2025-02-11 | Absent | Referred the $1.4 million Housing Stability Services budget item to a future meeting for an operational plan, while directing Civic Administration to continue existing basic-human-needs services with existing funding through April 30, 2025. | (2.5) Unsheltered Homelessness Encampment Initiative and Incremental Reaching Home Funding Allocations | Motion to refer part h): h) the use of Housing Stability Services budget for a total am… | Motion Passed (10 to 2) |
| 2025-02-11 | Absent | Referred part d) — a proposed funding increase to continue Ark Aid day drop-in space — to Civic Administration to examine options for beds instead of day drop-in space. | (2.5) Unsheltered Homelessness Encampment Initiative and Incremental Reaching Home Funding Allocations | that part d) relating to an amendment to the existing Municipal Purchase of Service agr… | Motion Passed (10 to 2) |
| 2024-11-19 | Yea | Adopted the Service Depot Location Update Report item as amended: received the report with no further action, directed a report-back on mobile transactional outreach, and continued existing depot service delivery until February 28, 2025. (committee stage) | Service Depot Location Update Report (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2024-11-19 | Yea | Amended parts b) and c) to direct a report-back on mobile transactional outreach services and to continue transactional service delivery at existing service depot locations only until February 28, 2025, rather than indefinitely. (committee stage) | Service Depot Location Update Report (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion be amended with parts b) and c) to read as follows: b) Civic Administra… | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2024-11-05 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to report back on setback-distance criteria (25m/50m/100m options, remaining available area, and ward-by-ward impact) for encampments from private residential property lines — a study request, not a decision on setbacks themselves. | (4.1) Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update | That the motion be amended by adding a new part k) to read as follows: k) Civic Adminis… | Motion Failed (4 to 11) |
| 2024-11-05 | Nay | Would have proposed re-amending part b) back to text identical to the already-pending wording (no BIA siting restriction), after the amendment adding that restriction had already failed — a restatement with no clear net effect on the pending text. | (4.1) Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update | That the motion to amend part b) be further amended to read as follows: b) the Civic Ad… | Motion Failed (3 to 12) |
| 2024-11-05 | Nay | Would have amended part b) so Council’s request to federal/provincial governments for encampment funding would specify that the additional overnight spaces not be located on the main street of any Business Improvement Area. | (4.1) Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update | That the motion to amend part b) be further amended to read as follows : b) the Civic A… | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2024-10-29 | Yea | Referred the councillors’ correspondence on the feasibility of a quick-build community of small housing structures (e.g., sprung shelters, tiny homes) to the Customer Service and Process Improvements Reference Group for feedback from development, construction, and real-estate industry partners. (committee stage) | Sprung Shelter Motion - Councillor S. Franke and Councillor J. Pribil | That correspondence from Councillor S. Franke and Councillor J. Pribil regarding the fe… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-10-29 | Yea | Approved part f)(iii), formally deferring future service depot location decisions to the November 19, 2024 SPPC meeting and directing a new list of possible locations with a 50-to-100-metre buffer, more evenly dispersed and not concentrated in one ward. (committee stage) | Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part f) iii) of the motion, as amended, be approved: iii) future service depot loc… | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2024-10-29 | Yea | Approved part c), Council’s request that Civic Administration and the Mayor engage federal and provincial governments to fund the Encampment Implementation Recommendations for 2025 as part of a $250-million federal encampments fund. (committee stage) | Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update | That part c) of the motion, as amended, be approved: c) the Civic Administration and th… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-10-29 | Nay | Would have endorsed a 25-metre setback requirement for the Community Encampment Response Plan from any private residential property line with a habitable dwelling, per the Building Code. (committee stage) | Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update | That part a) of the motion be approved: a) amendments to the setback requirements in th… | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2024-10-29 | Yea | Amended part f)(iii) to defer future service depot location decisions to the November 19, 2024 SPPC meeting and directed Civic Administration to bring forward a new list of possible locations with a 50-to-100-metre buffer, more evenly dispersed and not concentrated in one ward. (committee stage) | Whole of Community System Response – Community Encampment Plan: Implementation Recommendations 2025 and Basic Needs Update (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part f) iii) of the motion be amended to read as follows: iii) future service depo… | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2024-07-18 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to engage with the Old East Village BIA, local residents, and Ark Aid Street Mission Inc. to review the Year-Round Stable Responsive Services strategy — a consultation directive, not a funding or operational decision. (committee stage) | SS-2024-237 Single Source Award for Year-Round Ark Aid Mission Strategy | That the motion be amended to include a new part g) to read as follows: g) Civic Admini… | Motion Passed (12 to 1) |
| 2024-06-18 | Yea | Approved referring the decision on Encampment Response Option 2 (year-round depot services) and its funding source to a future SPPC meeting, pending a staff report on London’s application for $250M in federal encampment funding, while directing the existing depot meal program continue in the interim. (committee stage) | Basic Needs Response Plan (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the referral, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2024-06-18 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to report back on existing public washroom facilities citywide (hours, locations, staffing, usage) to help Council assess whether access aligns with encampment and basic-needs services — a study, not a service decision. (committee stage) | Basic Needs Response Plan | That the motion BE AMENDED to include a new part g) to read as follows: g) that Civic A… | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2024-06-18 | Yea | Approved the first encampment buffer-zone bullet — a 150-metre setback from elementary schools and daycare centres — as amended, as part of endorsing the Community Encampment Response Plan. (committee stage) | London’s Health & Homelessness Whole of Community System Response - Proposed Community Encampment Response Plan | That part a), first bullet, as amended, BE APPROVED and reads as follows: a) That, “The… | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2024-06-18 | Yea | Approved the 150-metre encampment buffer-zone setback from elementary schools and children’s daycare centres as part of the Community Encampment Response Plan. (committee stage) | London’s Health & Homelessness Whole of Community System Response - Proposed Community Encampment Response Plan | That part a) BE APPROVED and reads as follows: - On or within 150 metres of an elementa… | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2024-06-18 | Yea | Amended the Community Encampment Response Plan’s buffer-zone guidelines to include a 150-metre setback from elementary schools/daycares and a 100-metre setback from private residential properties. (committee stage) | London’s Health & Homelessness Whole of Community System Response - Proposed Community Encampment Response Plan | That part a) BE FURTHER AMENDED as follows: - On or within 150 metres of an elementary … | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2024-05-14 | Nay | Would have referred a proposed $130,000 increase to Safe Space London’s homeless day/overnight drop-in space funding to a future meeting; this confirming vote failed, so the referral did not take effect at Council. | (5.1) Request for One-Time Funding for Ark Aid | That part b) of the motion BE APPROVED to read as follows: b) that consideration of the… | Motion Failed (7 to 7) |
| 2024-05-07 | Yea | Referred a proposed $130,000 increase to Safe Space London’s homeless drop-in space funding to a future committee meeting rather than deciding it immediately. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Request for One-Time Funding for Ark Aid - Mayor J. Morgan and Deputy Mayor S. Lewis (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part b) of the motion BE REFERRED to the May 28, 2024 meeting of the Strategic Pri… | Motion Passed (8 to 6) |
| 2024-03-05 | Yea | Would have approved a smaller package extending only the London Cares day/overnight-space and security agreement (dropping the parallel Safe Space London extension) and directed staff to report back on plans and security concerns for the Safe Space London location at 602 Queens; this motion failed. (committee stage) | Contract Amendments to Maintain Day and Overnight Spaces for Unsheltered Londoners | That the following actions BE TAKEN with respect to the Contract Amendments to Maintain… | Motion Failed (2 to 13) |
| 2024-02-13 | Yea | Would have referred the Housing Stability Services purchase-of-service agreements back to Civic Administration to meet with providers, review proposed budgets for two-year (rather than one-year) renewal savings, and report back to a future meeting. | (2.2) SS-2024-042: Housing Stability Services Single Source | That the Housing Stability Services Municipal Purchase of Service Agreements BE REFERRE… | Motion Failed (3 to 12) |
| 2023-12-19 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to change the reporting frequency of the comprehensive Whole of Community System Response progress update to quarterly. | (4.1) Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor S. Franke - Submission Regarding Progress Update - Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response | That Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to adjust the frequency of the overall comprehens… | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2023-12-19 | Yea | Reconsidered Council’s earlier decision directing monthly Whole of Community System Response progress reporting, reopening the matter so an alternate reporting direction could be considered. | (4.1) Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor S. Franke - Submission Regarding Progress Update - Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response | That pursuant to section 13.3 of the Council Procedure By-law reconsideration of clause… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2023-12-12 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to change the frequency of the comprehensive Whole of Community System Response progress-update report to quarterly. (committee stage) | Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor S. Franke - Submission Regarding Progress Update - Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response | b) pursuant to section 35.7 of the Council Procedure By-law should reconsideration pass… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2023-12-12 | Yea | Amended the reconsidered motion to propose changing the Whole of Community System Response progress-update frequency from twice annually to quarterly. (committee stage) | Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor S. Franke - Submission Regarding Progress Update - Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response | That the motion BE AMENDED to reflect the frequency of the overall comprehensive “Progr… | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2023-12-12 | Nay | Reconsidered Council’s earlier decision that Civic Administration report back monthly on the Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response, reopening the matter for a new reporting-frequency direction. (committee stage) | Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor S. Franke - Submission Regarding Progress Update - Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response | That with respect to the matter of Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Re… | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2023-10-31 | Yea | Would have directed Civic Administration to report back on recovery services, staffing ratios, and funding sources for expanded recovery programs and staffing within existing local emergency shelters, and report back to the November 21, 2023 committee meeting. (committee stage) | City of London’s Response to Housing and Homelessness - Councillors S. Stevenson and J. Pribil | That the following actions be taken with respect to the City of London’s response to Ho… | Motion Failed (4 to 10) |
| 2023-10-05 | Yea | Approved making the already-decided annual hub funding subject to the availability of funding through the City or other sources. | (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) | That part h) of the recommendation BE APPROVED: h) that the annual funding approval, no… | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2023-10-05 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to keep working with the community on the hubs implementation to identify additional space for possible future procurement. | (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) | That part g) of the recommendation BE APPROVED: g) that Civic Administration BE DIRECTE… | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2023-10-05 | Yea | Approved making the already-awarded hub funding conditional on the City entering into a purchase-of-service agreement with Canadian Mental Health Association Thames Valley Addiction and Mental Health Services. | (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) | That part f) iii) of the recommendation BE APPROVED: iii. Canadian Mental Health Associ… | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
| 2023-10-05 | Yea | Approved making the already-awarded hub funding conditional on the City entering into a purchase-of-service agreement with Atlohsa Family Healing Services Inc. | (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) | That part f) ii) of the recommendation BE APPROVED: ii. Atlohsa Family Healing Services… | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2023-10-05 | Yea | Approved making the already-awarded hub funding conditional on the City entering into a purchase-of-service agreement with Youth Opportunities Unlimited. | (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) | That part f) i) of the recommendation BE APPROVED: f) that the approval given herein BE… | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2023-10-05 | Nay | Authorized Civic Administration to carry out the administrative work needed to implement the already-awarded hubs, including site reviews and Planning Act application support. | (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) | That part e) of the recommendation BE APPROVED: e) that Civic Administration BE AUTHORI… | Motion Passed (9 to 5) |
| 2023-10-05 | Yea | Would have referred the Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response hubs implementation award decision back to the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee to consider additional supporting information. | (4.2) Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results (Relates to Bill No. 367) | That the matter of the Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2… | Motion Failed (4 to 10) |
| 2023-09-25 | Yea | Would have referred the homelessness hubs implementation award decision to the October 31, 2023 Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee meeting instead of deciding it that day. (committee stage) | Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Response RFP 2023-199 Hubs Implementation Plan Results | That consideration of Item 4.2, Health and Homelessness Whole of Community System Respo… | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2023-09-12 | Yea | Endorsed additional Old East Village safety and security programming — Coordinated Informed Response programming and street cleaning — accommodated within existing Housing Stability Services budgets, with no new funding. (committee stage) | Community and Neighbourhood Safety and Security Concerns Options for Agencies, Staff, Volunteers and those Accessing Services (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve part c) of the clause. | Motion Passed (4 to 1) |
| 2023-07-25 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to report to a future Community and Protective Services Committee meeting on options and costs to address safety and security concerns raised by homelessness-response agencies, their staff/volunteers, and people accessing their services | (2.3) Housing Stability Services 2023-24 Contract Amendments | That the recommendation BE AMENDED by adding the following new part e): e) the Civic Ad… | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2023-07-18 | Yea | Referred a proposed one-time funding allocation to London Cares Homeless Response Services back to Civic Administration for more information on neighbourhood-engagement concerns and security staffing. (committee stage) | Housing Stability Services 2023-24 Contract Amendments | That the motion BE AMENDED in part b) to read as follows: “b) the matter of a one-time … | Motion Passed (5 to 1) |
| 2023-02-28 | Nay | Would have added a new Draft Metric c) under the Housing and Homelessness strategic area of focus (Expected Result 2.2) to the Draft 2023-2027 Strategic Plan; the metric’s own wording is not captured in the meeting record (the motion text stops after the metric label). Failed 4-9. (committee stage) | Developing Council’s 2023-2027 Strategic Plan: Draft Metrics | That the Strategic Area of Focus: Housing and Homelessness, Expected Result 2.2, BE AME… | Motion Failed (4 to 9) |
| 2023-02-28 | Yea | Approved an amendment directing Civic Administration to report back monthly to future standing committees on progress updates for the Whole of Community System Response to homelessness — a reporting-cadence request, not a decision on the response’s scale. (committee stage) | Health and Homelessness Summits - Proposed Whole of Community System Response | That the following amendment to the motion, BE APPROVED: e) to read as follows “the Civ… | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
Transit & Roads
Of the 28 divided votes on this issue since 2023 that had a clear direction, this councillor has a recorded position on 25 of them. The other 3: 3 were motions at a meeting where this councillor was listed as also present (no vote recorded).
expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure vs. reduced public transit service or transit infrastructure
Of 20 divided votes since 2023 where the motion’s effect on this axis was clear, this councillor supported 14 measures that would have expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure; opposed 3 measures that would have expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure; opposed 3 measures that would have reduced public transit service or transit infrastructure.
Show all 20 votes behind this pattern (20 rows across 15 distinct decisions — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-21 | Yea | Approved introducing a by-law to enter into and execute a Contribution Agreement with the federal government for baseline Canada Public Transit Fund funding, and authorized related administrative acts. | (2.2) Canada Public Transit Fund - Baseline Funding – Contribution Agreement (Relates to Bill No. 268) | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Finance Supports, the following… | expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2026-02-10 | Nay | Approved introducing the by-law authorizing the MOU and Agreement for the new Secondary School Transit Pass Pilot Program, capped at $880,000 in financing for September 2026 to June 2028 with July/August excluded. | (2.3) Secondary School Transit Pass Pilot Program Update (Relates to Bill No. 64) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That item 5, clause 2.3, as amended, BE APPROVED. | opposed a measure that would have expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (9 to 5) |
| 2026-02-03 | Nay | Approved (at committee) introducing the by-law authorizing the MOU and Agreement for the new Secondary School Transit Pass Pilot Program, funded up to $1.04 million for September 2026 to August 2028 with summer months excluded. (committee stage) | Secondary School Transit Pass Pilot Program Update (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | opposed a measure that would have expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (7 to 4) |
| 2025-09-23 | Yea | Increased the AECOM detailed-design contract by $803,764 (to $8,479,052) and approved financing for the Wellington Gateway Transit and Municipal Infrastructure Improvements project. | (2.1) Design Contract Price Increase: Wellington Gateway Transit and Municipal Infrastructure Improvements RFP20-29 | That on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment & Infrastructure, th… | expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2025-09-15 | Yea | Recommended increasing the AECOM detailed-design contract by $803,764 (to $8,479,052) and recommended approving financing for the Wellington Gateway Transit and Municipal Infrastructure Improvements project, at the Infrastructure and Corporate Services Committee stage (later ratified by Council as item 8.3.3 on September 23, 2025). | Design Contract Price Increase: Wellington Gateway Transit and Municipal Infrastructure Improvements RFP20-29 | That on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment & Infrastructure, th… | expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (5 to 1) |
| 2025-08-26 | Yea | Increased the AECOM construction-inspection and contract-administration services contract by $120,000 (to $1,924,701) and approved financing for the Wellington Street Rapid Transit Implementation project (Queens Avenue to the Thames River, South Branch). | (2.4) Consultant Contract Price Increase: Rapid Transit Implementation - Wellington Street from Queens Avenue to the Thames River (South Branch) | That on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment & Infrastructure, th… | expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2025-08-13 | Yea | Recommended increasing the AECOM construction-inspection and contract-administration services contract by $120,000 (to $1,924,701) and recommended approving financing for the Wellington Street Rapid Transit Implementation project (Queens Avenue to the Thames River, South Branch), at the Infrastructure and Corporate Services Committee stage (later ratified by Council as item 8.4.7 on August 26, 2025). | Consultant Contract Price Increase: Rapid Transit Implementation - Wellington Street from Queens Avenue to the Thames River (South Branch) | That on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment & Infrastructure, th… | expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (4 to 1) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Approved the Mobility Master Plan’s Transit Priority Network maps. | (4.1) Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps | Motion to approve part b): b) the Transit Priority Network maps BE APPROVED; | expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-03-25 | Yea | Approved the Transit Priority Network maps. (committee stage) | Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approved part b). | expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-01-13 | Yea | Approved a $26.4 million construction contract for the East London Link and Municipal Infrastructure Improvements Phase 4 project, and approved a Transportation Services Licence Agreement with the London Transit Commission and Fanshawe College to construct a transit facility on Fanshawe College property. (committee stage) | Contract Award: Tender No. RFT-2024-315 - East London Link and Municipal Infrastructure Improvements - Phase 4 - Oxford Street East | That on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment & Infrastructure, th… | expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (3 to 1) |
| 2024-11-22 | Nay | Would have removed the future capital budgets ($975,000 in 2025 and $4,325,000 in 2026) for the Rapid Transit - East London Link project, on a re-vote of the same amendment. (committee stage) | Amendment - Rapid Transit - East London Link - Councillor S. Stevenson | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED to remove the future capital budg… | opposed a measure that would have reduced public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Failed (2 to 12) |
| 2024-11-22 | Nay | Would have removed the future capital budgets ($975,000 in 2025 and $4,325,000 in 2026) for the Rapid Transit - East London Link project, funding that is primarily Federal/Provincial PTIS and Development Charges supported. (committee stage) | Amendment - Rapid Transit - East London Link - Councillor S. Stevenson | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED to remove the future capital budg… | opposed a measure that would have reduced public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Failed (1 to 13) |
| 2024-11-21 | Nay | Would have reduced the London Transit Commission’s 2026 budget by $500,000, conditioning reinstatement on LTC submitting a 2026 budget amendment, getting its online booking system operational, and providing a plan to implement 10,000 additional 2025 service hours by Q1 2025. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Budget Case No. P-51 - Councillor C. Rahman | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED by reducing the London Transit Co… | opposed a measure that would have reduced public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2024-05-14 | Yea | Awarded construction contracts and increased consultant design-contract funding for the Wellington Road and East London Link Rapid Transit Implementation corridor infrastructure. | (2.5) Contract Award: Tender No. RFT-2024-094 - Wellington Gateway and Municipal Infrastructure Improvements Phase 4 - Harlech Gate to Wellington Commons Entrance | That items 6 (2.5), 7 (2.6) and 8 (2.7) BE APPROVED 6 (2.5) That on the recommendation … | expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (12 to 2) |
| 2024-04-23 | Yea | Directed staff to develop an MOU with the school board to launch a pilot providing free annual transit passes to Grade 9 (later Grade 9-10) students at Clarke Road Secondary School. | (5.1) Secondary School Student Transit Pass Pilot Project - Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor P. Cuddy | That the following actions be taken with respect to establishing a secondary school stu… | expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (8 to 6) |
| 2024-04-16 | Nay | Directed staff to develop an MOU with the school board to launch a pilot providing free annual transit passes to Grade 9 students at Clarke Road Secondary School. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Secondary School Student Transit Pass Pilot Project - Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor P. Cuddy | That the following actions be taken with respect to establishing a secondary school stu… | opposed a measure that would have expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2024-02-15 | Yea | Increased funding for Business Case No. P-51 to provide 18,000 hours of London Transit conventional service growth per year, as recommended by the London Transit Commission. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-51 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include the revised conventi… | expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2024-02-13 | Yea | Awarded an $18.3 million construction contract to Bre-Ex Construction Inc. for Rapid Transit Implementation at Clarks Bridge and Wellington Road. | (2.6) Contract Award - Tender No. RFT-2022-314 - Rapid Transit Implementation - Clarks Bridge and Wellington Road from Thames River to Watson Street | That on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment and Infrastructure, … | expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2024-02-08 | Yea | Would have increased funding for Business Case No. P-51 to add the revised conventional transit service-hours growth for 2024, as approved by the London Transit Commission. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-51 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include the revised conventi… | backed a measure that would have expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2023-02-14 | Yea | Approved awarding the Rapid Transit Implementation contract (Wellington Street, Queens Avenue to the Thames River South Branch) to Bre-Ex Construction Inc. at $28,540,331.45, despite the bid exceeding the Downtown Loop Phase 3 project budget (an irregular result), and authorized the related inspection, financing, and administrative acts. | (2.5) Contract Award: Tender No. RFT-2022-248 Rapid Transit Implementation - Wellington Street from Queens Avenue to the Thames River (South Branch) - Irregular Result | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment and Infrastructure,… | expanded public transit service or transit infrastructure | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
expanded general-purpose road capacity vs. reduced or declined general-purpose road capacity
Only 2 distinct decisions since 2023 (5 recorded votes across them) — too few to describe a pattern. The individual votes are listed below.
Show all 5 votes behind this pattern (5 rows across 2 distinct decisions — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to restart the Wonderland Road corridor Environmental Assessment (Southdale Road to Fanshawe Park Road) to build six general-purpose through lanes, with a long-term option to convert to Bus Rapid Transit, and to update the Mobility Master Plan maps accordingly. | (4.1) Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps | Motion to approve part e): e) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to re-start the Disc… | expanded general-purpose road capacity | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Approved the Mobility Master Plan’s Roads Projects maps, with an amendment to include the expansion of Bradley Avenue (Wellington Road to Highbury Avenue) in the next improvement cycle. | (4.1) Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve preamble and part a): That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City … | expanded general-purpose road capacity | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2025-03-25 | Yea | Recommended approving, as amended, the Roads Projects maps, including adding the Bradley Avenue (Wellington Road to Highbury Avenue) expansion to the next improvement cycle. | Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve part a), as amended. | expanded general-purpose road capacity | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-03-25 | Yea | Added the Bradley Avenue expansion (Wellington Road to Highbury Avenue) to the Roads Projects Timeline’s next improvement cycle. (committee stage) | Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part a) be amended with a new part i) and reads as follows: a) the Roads Projects … | expanded general-purpose road capacity | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-03-25 | Yea | Added a clause directing Civic Administration to restart the Wonderland Road corridor Environmental Assessment (Southdale Road to Fanshawe Park Road) to build six general-purpose through lanes, with a long-term option to convert to Bus Rapid Transit, and to update the Mobility Master Plan maps accordingly. (committee stage) | Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps | That with respect the Master Mobility Plan, the following part be added: e) the Civic A… | expanded general-purpose road capacity | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
27 motions with no clear direction on this issue (excluded from the pattern counts above; shown for transparency, not as evidence of a position)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-21 | Yea | Directed the London Transit Commission to review a set of Rapid Transit opportunities — fare collection, vehicle specifications, branding, and station enhancements — and report back to Council on implementation by Q4 2026. (committee stage) | London Transit Rapid Transit Operational Readiness Review | That part b) BE APPROVED and reads as follows: b) the London Transit Commission BE DIRE… | Motion Passed (11 to 2) |
| 2026-02-03 | Yea | Amended the Secondary School Transit Pass Pilot Program’s financing clause to run through August 2028 instead of June 2028, without changing the $1.04 million funding cap. (committee stage) | Secondary School Transit Pass Pilot Program Update | That the motion be amended in part c) to read as follows: c) the Civic Administration B… | Motion Passed (10 to 3) |
| 2025-11-20 | Yea | Approved a $155,000 increase to the roadways budget, funded from the Automated Enforcement Reserve Fund over two years, to implement traffic calming in school zones and deploy additional temporary traffic calming devices near construction-related traffic diversions. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Councillors C. Rahman and S. Stevenson (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the amendment, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2025-11-20 | Yea | Changed the funding duration of a proposed roadways/traffic-calming budget increase from three years to two years. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Councillors C. Rahman and S. Stevenson | That the amendment BE AMENDED to change three (3) years to two (2) years. | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2025-09-29 | Nay | Would have referred to the London Transit Commission the question of offering free transit on high-heat days. (committee stage) | Adequate and Suitable Cooling By-law and Maximum Temperature Amendments to the AMPs By-law (A-54) (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part c) of the amendment BE APPROVED. | Motion Failed (2 to 4) |
| 2025-09-08 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to report back to a future meeting of the Community and Protective Services Committee with respect to other improvements at the Western Rd, Sarnia Ave / Phillip Aziz Ave intersection, including more detailed information about the feasibility of a pedestrian scramble; failed 1-4. (committee stage) | Philip Aziz Avenue Corridor and Intersection Improvements Project Update (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | c) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to a future meeting of the Commu… | Motion Failed (1 to 4) |
| 2025-07-22 | Yea | Approved the Mobility Master Plan Report and directed staff to file its Notice of Completion for the statutory public review period. | (4.3) Mobility Master Plan Notice of Completion | That, the followings actions be taken with respect to the Mobility Master Plan Report: … | Motion Passed (10 to 2) |
| 2025-07-17 | Yea | Approved the Mobility Master Plan Report and directed staff to file its Notice of Completion for the statutory public review period. (committee stage) | Mobility Master Plan Notice of Completion (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That parts a) and b) of the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2025-07-17 | Yea | Deferred consideration of London Transit Commission governance pending an external governance review. (committee stage) | London Transit Commission Governance - Councillor S. Franke, Chair, London Transit | That London Transit Commission Governance BE DEFERRED pending the outcome of the extern… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Approved the Mobility Master Plan Network Maps item as amended, ratifying the individual map approvals and amendments decided separately above (roads, transit priority, cycling network changes, sidewalk gaps, the Wonderland Road EA restart, and ring road advocacy). | (4.1) Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Item 9, clause 4.1, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Requested that the Mayor and Civic Administration begin discussions with neighbouring municipalities and the Province on a potential ring road and integrated regional transportation network. | (4.1) Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps | Motion to approve part f): f) the Mayor and Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to engage… | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2025-03-25 | Yea | Referred Council Member appointments to the restructured London Transit Commission to the April 1, 2025 Council meeting. (committee stage) | London Transit Commission Assessment Growth Business Case | Motion that part d) of the motion referring to Council appointments to the London Trans… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-03-25 | Nay | Dissolved the current London Transit Commission, effective April 1, 2025, pending an ongoing governance review. (committee stage) | London Transit Commission Assessment Growth Business Case | Motion to approve part b): b) the current London Transit Commission BE DISSOLVED, effec… | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2025-03-25 | Yea | Would have referred the motion regarding the London Transit Commission’s dissolution and restructuring to the next Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee meeting; failed 3-12. (committee stage) | London Transit Commission Assessment Growth Business Case | That the motion regarding the London Transit Commission BE REFERRED to the next meeting… | Motion Failed (3 to 12) |
| 2025-03-25 | Yea | Requested the Mayor and Civic Administration engage neighbouring municipalities and the Province in discussions on a collaborative ring road and integrated regional transportation network. (committee stage) | Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps | That with respect the Master Mobility Plan, the following part be added: f) the Mayor a… | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2024-08-27 | Nay | Would have referred the Secondary School Student Transit Pass Pilot Program back to the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee to explore options serving other school routes, rather than deciding the committee’s recommended program; failed 5-10. | (2.2) Secondary School Student Transit Pass Pilot Program | That the Secondary School Student Transit Pass Pilot Program BE REFERRED back to the St… | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2024-08-15 | Yea | Deferred the start of the Secondary School Student Transit Pass Pilot Program to the 2025-26 and 2026-27 school years, directing Civic Administration and the London Transit Commission to develop a Memorandum of Understanding with the Thames Valley District School Board to provide transit passes to Clarke Road Secondary School students, with a report back on the MOU, financing, and metrics. (committee stage) | Secondary School Student Transit Pass Pilot Program | That part b) be approved as follows: b) the secondary school pilot project BE DEFERRED … | Motion Passed (9 to 3) |
| 2024-07-23 | Nay | Would have introduced a by-law amending the Traffic and Parking By-law to lower speed limits in school zones on major streets; failed 5-9. | (2.7) School Zone Speed Limit Reductions on Major Streets Amendments to the Traffic and Parking By-law (Relates to Bill No. 247) | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment and Infrastructure,… | Motion Failed (5 to 9) |
| 2024-06-04 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to report back to the Civic Works Committee on transit, road-network, and active-transportation planning for West London, including a study of filtered-permeability measures to address cut-through traffic — no substantive transit decision was made. | (4.1) Transit, Road Network and Active Transportation Planning for West London – Councillor S. Trosow | That the following actions be taken with respect to Road Network and Active Transportat… | Motion Passed (10 to 4) |
| 2024-04-16 | Yea | Would have referred the entire secondary-school transit-pass pilot proposal to the next committee meeting instead of deciding it immediately; failed, so the committee proceeded to approve the pilot the same meeting. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Secondary School Student Transit Pass Pilot Project - Deputy Mayor S. Lewis and Councillor P. Cuddy | That the following actions be taken with respect to a secondary school student transit … | Motion Failed (4 to 11) |
| 2024-04-02 | Yea | Set the City’s 2050 mode share target at 32.5% (or higher) combined for transit, walking, and cycling trips — the more ambitious of the staff-presented options — to be reviewed at least every four years. | (4.4) Mobility Master Plan 2050 Mode Share Target | That the following actions be taken with respect to the Mobility Master Plan; a) the 20… | Motion Passed (11 to 2) |
| 2024-03-26 | Yea | Set the city’s 2050 Mobility Master Plan target at Option 2 or greater — a 32.5% (or higher) mode share for transit, walking, and cycling combined. (committee stage) | Mobility Master Plan 2050 Mode Share Target | That the following actions be taken with respect to the Mobility Master Plan; a) the 20… | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2024-03-26 | Yea | Amended the motion to define ‘Option 2’ in the mode share target as specifically a 32.5% mode share split, a definitional clarification whose effect relative to the undefined baseline is not stated in the clause itself. (committee stage) | Mobility Master Plan 2050 Mode Share Target (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion BE AMENDED to change Option 2 to represent 32.5% Mode Share split | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2024-03-26 | Yea | Adopted Option 2 as the city’s 2050 Mobility Master Plan mode share target (rather than the alternative of deferring/referring the target-setting decision, which had just failed). (committee stage) | Mobility Master Plan 2050 Mode Share Target | That the motion be amended TO APPROVE Option 2 as the 2050 mode share target for the de… | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2023-11-07 | Yea | Directed the Mobility Master Plan project team to consult with the Integrated Transportation Community Advisory Committee, and directed staff to show how mode-share options align with Climate Emergency Action Plan goals. | (2.5) Mobility Master Plan 2050 Mode Share Target (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve parts b) and c) | Motion Passed (11 to 3) |
| 2023-07-25 | Yea | Requested that Civic Administration remove ‘Mode Target Share Option 1’ from the Mobility Master Plan update staff report | (4.3) Mobility Master Plan Update Strategies, Mode Share Target Options and Project Evaluation Frameworks | That part b) of the motion BE APPROVED: b) the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to rem… | Motion Passed (11 to 2) |
| 2023-01-23 | Yea | Approved Expected Result e) of the Wellbeing and Safety strategic focus area (Outcome 1) in the Draft 2023-2027 Strategic Plan: ‘Improved traffic safety, traffic calming’ — an aspirational plan statement, not a specific traffic-calming project. (committee stage) | Developing the 2023-2027 Strategic Plan: Setting the Strategic Areas of Focus, Outcomes and Expected Results | That the draft “Wellbeing and Safety” strategic focus Outcome 1, Expected Results, part… | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
Climate & Green Space
Of the 17 divided votes on this issue since 2023 that had a clear direction, this councillor has a recorded position on 13 of them (2 of these are excluded from the pattern counts — see below). The other 4: 3 were motions at a meeting where this councillor was listed as also present (no vote recorded); 1 was a motion with no recorded vote for this councillor at that meeting.
approved the climate/environmental item vs. denied the climate/environmental item
Of 6 divided votes since 2023 where the motion’s effect on this axis was clear, this councillor supported 5 measures that would have approved the climate/environmental item; opposed 1 measure that would have approved the climate/environmental item. No motion on this axis since 2023 would have denied the climate/environmental item — every direction-bearing motion here would have approved the climate/environmental item.
Show all 6 votes behind this pattern
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-23 | Yea | Approved entering into a Green Municipal Fund grant agreement with the Federation of Canadian Municipalities to fund a project enhancing London’s resilience through climate adaptation planning, and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute it. | (2.3) Federation of Canadian Municipalities: Green Municipal Fund Agreement for Enhancing London’s Resilience Through Climate Adaptation Planning (Relates to Bill No. 241) | That on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment & Infrastructure, th… | approved the climate/environmental item | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2026-03-03 | Yea | Approved and authorized execution of a Federation of Canadian Municipalities Green Municipal Fund grant agreement (CORE-24-0309) to fund a feasibility study of electrifying the municipal vehicle fleet — a binding decision to accept and execute the funding agreement, not a staff report-back request. | (2.3) Federation of Canadian Municipalities: Green Municipal Fund Agreement for Municipal Fleet Decarbonization Feasibility Study (Relates to Bill No. 98) | That on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment & Infrastructure, th… | approved the climate/environmental item | Motion Passed (11 to 1) |
| 2026-03-03 | Yea | Approved and authorized execution of a Federation of Canadian Municipalities Green Municipal Fund grant agreement (CORE-25-0485) to fund a study of the potential for net-zero community energy in London — a binding decision to accept and execute the funding agreement, not a staff report-back request. | (2.2) Federation of Canadian Municipalities: Green Municipal Fund Agreement for Accelerating Community Energy Systems (Relates to Bill No. 97) | That on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment & Infrastructure, th… | approved the climate/environmental item | Motion Passed (11 to 1) |
| 2025-07-22 | Yea | Introduced by-laws approving the FCM funding agreement and Service Agreement to develop and deliver the BetterHomes London home energy retrofit and climate resilience program. | (2.7) Federation of Canadian Municipalities Community Efficiency Financing Agreement for BetterHomes London (Relates to Bill No.’s 278 and 279) | That on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment and Infrastructure, … | approved the climate/environmental item | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2024-06-04 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to design and implement a public-awareness campaign (February-April 2025) promoting better lawn and garden practices to help the environment and support climate action. | (2.12) Update and Next Steps for Gasoline Powered Lawn and Garden Equipment | That part b) of the motion be approved as follows: b) the Civic Administration BE DIREC… | opposed a measure that would have approved the climate/environmental item | Motion Failed (5 to 9) |
| 2023-05-30 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to add specific implementation actions to the Climate Emergency Action Plan (CEAP): deliver CEAP training to all current and future staff, bring a CEAP progress update to the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee twice a year, develop a Net-Zero Emission Plan for Corporate Assets aimed at 2045 corporate targets, and align asset-management projects (retrofits, replacements, renewals) with those net-zero targets. (committee stage) | 2022 Climate Emergency Action Plan Progress Report | Motion to approve part b) b) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to include the follow… | approved the climate/environmental item | Motion Passed (11 to 2) |
strengthened a climate or environmental target vs. weakened a climate or environmental target
Only 3 distinct decisions since 2023 — too few to describe a pattern. The individual votes are listed below.
2 votes excluded from the pattern above: this councillor’s recorded votes within this decision pointed in different directions across its stages, so none are counted in the tallies; each is listed here:
- Yea: Would have removed the requirement to use the Climate Emergency Screening Tool from the directive for Civic Administration to undertake an Industrial Land Needs Assessment; failed 6-9, leaving the screening-tool requirement in place. (committee stage) — 2023 Industrial Land Development Strategy (May 9, 2023, counts as against, Motion Failed (6 to 9))
- Yea: Directed Civic Administration to undertake an Industrial Land Needs Assessment that includes use of the Climate Emergency Screening Tool. (committee stage) — 2023 Industrial Land Development Strategy (May 9, 2023, counts as for, Motion Passed (12 to 3))
Show all 5 rows on this axis (3 votes behind this pattern, 2 votes excluded from it, see above) (5 rows across 4 distinct decisions — 3 behind this pattern, 1 excluded from it, see above — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to demonstrably use the City’s climate emergency screening tool as part of the Urban Growth Boundary Review; the motion failed. | (3.14) Land Needs Assessment - Official Plan Review of The London Plan (O-9595) | That the motion be amended to include new part h) to read as follows: h) the Civic Admi… | opposed a measure that would have strengthened a climate or environmental target | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
| 2024-01-23 | Yea | Directed staff to update the Site Plan Control and/or Zoning By-laws by Q3 2024 to require EV-charging rough-ins, minimum native-species landscaping, short-term bicycle parking, and bird-friendly (CSA A460) building design standards, and to review a legislative framework for broader sustainable building requirements (energy efficiency, water conservation, green roofs). | (5.2) Green Development Standards | That the following actions be taken with respect to the Site Plan Control By-law and/or… | strengthened a climate or environmental target | Motion Passed (13 to 1) |
| 2023-06-06 | Yea | A yea directed Civic Administration to implement specific Climate Emergency Action Plan actions, including developing a Net-Zero Emission Plan for corporate assets and aligning City infrastructure renewal work with the 2045 net-zero corporate targets. | (4.1) 2022 Climate Emergency Action Plan Progress Report | Motion to approve Item 4, clause 4.1, part b). | strengthened a climate or environmental target | Motion Passed (11 to 2) |
| 2023-05-09 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to undertake an Industrial Land Needs Assessment that includes use of the Climate Emergency Screening Tool. (committee stage) | 2023 Industrial Land Development Strategy | Motion to approve part d): d) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to undertake an Indu… | strengthened a climate or environmental target | Motion Passed (12 to 3) |
| 2023-05-09 | Yea | Would have removed the requirement to use the Climate Emergency Screening Tool from the directive for Civic Administration to undertake an Industrial Land Needs Assessment; failed 6-9, leaving the screening-tool requirement in place. (committee stage) | 2023 Industrial Land Development Strategy | That the motion be amended in part d) by removing, ” which shall include the use of the… | backed a measure that would have weakened a climate or environmental target | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
increased tree canopy or natural-heritage protection vs. reduced tree canopy or natural-heritage protection
Only 2 distinct decisions since 2023 — too few to describe a pattern. The individual votes are listed below.
Show all 2 votes behind this pattern
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-22 | Nay | Would have added a draft-plan condition requiring the developer to compensate for 1.27 hectares of removed wetlands and woodlands so there is no net loss of natural heritage features at the 3095 Bostwick Road subdivision. | O-25032) (Relates to Bill No.’s 136 and 146) | that part c) be amended to include i) to read as follows: i) The subdivision approval a… | opposed a measure that would have increased tree canopy or natural-heritage protection | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2024-02-08 | Yea | Approved funding for 50% of Business Case No. P-62 (Environmentally Significant Areas Management). (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-62 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to fund 50% of Business Case No. P… | increased tree canopy or natural-heritage protection | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
19 motions with no clear direction on this issue (excluded from the pattern counts above; shown for transparency, not as evidence of a position)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-23 | Nay | Would have approved directing Civic Administration to study wildlife-vehicle-collision mitigation infrastructure costs, develop a natural-heritage connectivity plan for west-end lands entering the Urban Growth Boundary, and map the City’s agricultural land holdings. | (3.1) 5th Report of the Environmental Stewardship and Action Community Advisory Committee (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part f) i) to iii) of the motion BE APPROVED | Motion Failed (4 to 10) |
| 2025-09-23 | Nay | Would have referred the requested wildlife-vehicle-collision cost study and natural-heritage connectivity-plan requests (part f i-iii of the Environmental Stewardship report) to a future Planning and Environment Committee meeting for consideration. | (3.1) 5th Report of the Environmental Stewardship and Action Community Advisory Committee | That part f) i) to iii) of the 5th Report of the Environmental Stewardship and Action C… | Motion Failed (7 to 7) |
| 2025-08-26 | Yea | Adopted the amended Conservation Master Plan directive: removed the planned trail section from Attawandaron Road Park and halted its construction, directed a report back on property-encroachment options, and directed that passive recreation consistent with historical use continue in the defined park area. | (2.7) Medway Valley Heritage Forest Environmentally Significant Area (South) Conservation Master Plan (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2025-08-26 | Nay | Would have referred the proposed Medway Valley Conservation Master Plan changes back to Civic Administration to report back with potential design alternatives for the trail, resident concerns about its location and design, and AODA-compliance considerations. | (2.7) Medway Valley Heritage Forest Environmentally Significant Area (South) Conservation Master Plan | That the proposed changes to the Medway Valley Heritage Forest Environmentally Signific… | Motion Failed (4 to 11) |
| 2025-08-26 | Nay | Directed that the Conservation Master Plan review include passive recreation consistent with the historical use of the defined Attawandaron Road Park area, and outline how that space will be maintained going forward. | (2.7) Medway Valley Heritage Forest Environmentally Significant Area (South) Conservation Master Plan | That the motion be amended by including a new part c) to read as follows: c) the Civic … | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2025-08-26 | Nay | Directed Civic Administration to report back with options addressing property encroachments (including considerations and impacts) for the properties at 1634 to 1786 Attawandaron Road, as part of the Medway Valley Conservation Master Plan review. | (2.7) Medway Valley Heritage Forest Environmentally Significant Area (South) Conservation Master Plan | That the motion be amended by including a new part b) to read as follows: b) the Civic … | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2025-08-26 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to bring a report to a future Planning and Environment Committee meeting examining the feasibility of an Agricultural Land Offset Policy, approaches for offsetting agricultural land losses, and alignment with the City’s environmental and planning frameworks. | (4.1) Agricultural Land Offset Policy | That the motion to receive be amended by adding the following: That the Civic Administr… | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2025-07-22 | Nay | Would have referred the BetterHomes London community efficiency financing report to a future committee meeting for a concierge-model report-back, rather than deciding on it. | (2.7) Federation of Canadian Municipalities Community Efficiency Financing Agreement for BetterHomes London (Relates to Bill No.’s 278 and 279) | That the following actions be taken with respect to the staff report dated July 14, 202… | Motion Failed (4 to 11) |
| 2024-11-21 | Yea | Directed that the cost of the Parks Operations Service Delivery Enhancements (Business Case P-31) be offset by a reduction in the annual contribution to the Climate Change Reserve Fund. (committee stage) | Amendment - Budget Case No. P-31 - Councillor and Budget Chair E. Peloza and Councillor S. Franke (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion be amended by adding another part to read as follows: That the budget i… | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2024-11-20 | Yea | Dissolved the Ecological Community Advisory Committee and the Integrated Transportation Community Advisory Committee effective April 2025, replacing them with a new Ecological Reference Group (by Q2 2025) to advise on the Official Plan’s natural heritage systems, and a Mobility and Transportation Working Group (by Q3 2025). (committee stage) | Community Advisory Committee Motion - Councillor C. Rahman and Deputy Mayor S. Lewis | That part e) and part f) be approved and read as follows: e) the Ecological Community A… | Motion Passed (11 to 2) |
| 2024-10-15 | Yea | Introduced a by-law authorizing and approving a Memorandum of Understanding with the London Chamber of Commerce to jointly advance climate action objectives, and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute it. | (3.2) Memorandum of Understanding with the London Chamber of Commerce for Action on Climate Change (Relates to Bill No. 341) | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Environment and Infrastructure,… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-08-27 | Yea | Referred the 455 Highbury Avenue North self-storage facility expansion application back to Civic Administration to work with the applicant on a plan reducing the scope of the expansion to allow for an adequate tree replacement plan. | (3.3) 455 Highbury Avenue North - (OZ-9739) | That the application by Highbury Self Storage Equities Limited, (c/o Zelinka Priamo Ltd… | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2024-06-04 | Yea | Would have authorized Civic Administration to pursue a multi-municipality research project on gasoline-powered lawn and garden equipment (best practices, costs/benefits, incentive programs), including a funding submission to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities’ Green Municipal Fund. | (2.12) Update and Next Steps for Gasoline Powered Lawn and Garden Equipment | That part c) of the motion be approved as follows: c) the Civic Administration BE APPRO… | Motion Failed (7 to 7) |
| 2024-05-22 | Nay | Directed staff to report back with proposed Sound By-law amendments restricting gas-powered lawn/garden equipment use, hold a public participation meeting, and circulate the report for advisory-committee feedback — a process step, not an actual restriction yet. (committee stage) | Update and Next Steps for Gasoline Powered Lawn and Garden Equipment | Motion to approve part d) of the clause. | Motion Passed (3 to 1) |
| 2024-02-15 | Yea | Reduced funding to the Climate Change Invest Fund under the Climate Emergency Action Plan (Business Case No. P-56) to a flat $1 million annual contribution, using the savings to offset transit service-hours funding. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-56 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED by reducing the funding to Init… | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2024-02-02 | Yea | Would have reshuffled the schedule of contributions to the Climate Change Investment Fund under the Climate Emergency Action Plan (CEAP) Implementation Support business case — cutting $750,000 in 2024 while adding $250,000/year in 2025-2027, a roughly net-neutral four-year total shifted later. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-56 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED by adjusting funding to Initiat… | Motion Failed (3 to 12) |
| 2023-07-25 | Yea | Directed the Mayor and two councillors to write to AMO advocating that the Province commit Ontario to a net-zero-carbon electricity grid by 2035, and directed staff to collect London facilities’ greenhouse-gas reduction plans (targeting net-zero emissions by 2050) and to discuss Clean Electricity Regulations implementation with Enbridge and London Hydro | (4.4) Councillor S. Franke - Climate Emergency Action Plan - Phase Out Gas | That the following actions be taken with respect to the Climate Emergency Action Plan: … | Motion Passed (10 to 3) |
| 2023-07-25 | Yea | Would have referred Councillor Franke’s Climate Emergency Action Plan - Phase Out Gas communications to Civic Administration for review, instead of acting on them directly at this meeting | (4.4) Councillor S. Franke - Climate Emergency Action Plan - Phase Out Gas | That the communications included on the Added Agenda from Councillor S. Franke, related… | Motion Failed (5 to 8) |
| 2023-02-28 | Nay | Would have added a new Draft Metric i), ‘grade level for watershed,’ under the Climate Action and Sustainable Growth strategic area of focus (1.2) of the Draft 2023-2027 Strategic Plan; failed 6-7. (committee stage) | Developing Council’s 2023-2027 Strategic Plan: Draft Metrics | That the Strategic Area of Focus: Climate Action and Sustainable Growth 1.2, BE AMENDED… | Motion Failed (6 to 7) |
Downtown & Core
Of the 14 divided votes on this issue since 2023 that had a clear direction, this councillor has a recorded position on 14 of them (3 of these are excluded from the pattern counts — see below).
approved the downtown/core-area item vs. denied the downtown/core-area item
Of 11 divided votes since 2023 where the motion’s effect on this axis was clear, this councillor supported 5 measures that would have approved the downtown/core-area item; opposed 1 measure that would have approved the downtown/core-area item; opposed 5 measures that would have denied the downtown/core-area item.
3 votes excluded from the pattern above: this councillor’s recorded votes within this decision pointed in different directions across its stages, so none are counted in the tallies; each is listed here:
- Nay: Would have narrowed the proposed free one-hour Core Area on-street parking program to weekdays only; failed, so the broader all-days wording stood for the next vote. (committee stage) — Core Area Parking Incentives Extension (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) (April 29, 2024, counts as against, Motion Failed (2 to 2))
- Yea: Would have approved implementing free one-hour on-street parking in the Core Area, funded up to $300,000; failed at committee (later passed at Council). (committee stage) — Core Area Parking Incentives Extension (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) (April 29, 2024, counts as for, Motion Failed (2 to 2))
- Yea: Would have approved a free one-hour parking pilot at Old East Village Municipal Lots No. 1 and No. 2, funded up to $30,000; failed at committee (later passed at Council). (committee stage) — Core Area Parking Incentives Extension (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) (April 29, 2024, counts as for, Motion Failed (1 to 3))
Show all 14 rows on this axis (11 votes behind this pattern, 3 votes excluded from it, see above) (14 rows across 8 distinct decisions — 7 behind this pattern, 1 excluded from it, see above — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-16 | Yea | Approved implementing the Downtown Reimagined Plan actions that can be accommodated within the City’s existing approved budgets. (committee stage) | Downtown Reimagined: City of London Downtown Plan | That the following part BE APPROVED: b) the actions identified in this Plan, that can b… | approved the downtown/core-area item | Motion Passed (11 to 2) |
| 2025-11-20 | Yea | Would have amended the 2026 Annual Budget Update to increase the budget by $330,000 in each of 2026 and 2027 to continue a free one-hour on-street parking program through the Honk App in the Core Area (Downtown, Midtown, and Old East Village). (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Councillor D. Ferreira | That the Mayor’s 2026 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED by increasing the budget to provi… | backed a measure that would have approved the downtown/core-area item | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2025-11-20 | Yea | Amended the 2026 Annual Budget Update to increase the budget by $784,000 in each of 2026 and 2027 to provide free two-hour on-street parking through the Honk App in the Core Area (Midtown, Downtown, and Old East Village). (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Councillor D. Ferreira | That the Mayor’s 2026 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED by increasing the budget to provi… | approved the downtown/core-area item | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2025-11-04 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to continue one-hour free on-street parking in the Core Area through the Honk App, funded from the existing approved Economic Development Reserve Fund allocation, through the end of 2025. | (5.2) Councillor D. Ferreira - Street Parking in the Core Area | That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to continue 1-hour free on street parking in … | approved the downtown/core-area item | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-04-29 | Yea | Would have approved a free one-hour parking pilot at Old East Village Municipal Lots No. 1 and No. 2, funded up to $30,000; failed at committee (later passed at Council). (committee stage) | Core Area Parking Incentives Extension (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve parts c) and d) of the clause. | backed a measure that would have approved the downtown/core-area item | Motion Failed (1 to 3) |
| 2024-04-29 | Yea | Would have approved implementing free one-hour on-street parking in the Core Area, funded up to $300,000; failed at committee (later passed at Council). (committee stage) | Core Area Parking Incentives Extension (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve parts a) and b) of the clause. | backed a measure that would have approved the downtown/core-area item | Motion Failed (2 to 2) |
| 2024-04-29 | Nay | Would have narrowed the proposed free one-hour Core Area on-street parking program to weekdays only; failed, so the broader all-days wording stood for the next vote. (committee stage) | Core Area Parking Incentives Extension (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to further amend by including a new part a) to read as follows: a) the Civic Adm… | opposed a measure that would have approved the downtown/core-area item | Motion Failed (2 to 2) |
| 2024-02-29 | Nay | Removed $100,000 per year (2024-2027) in capital funding for Dundas Place equipment from the base capital budget. | (3.28) Amendment - Capital Project RC1036 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Capital Project RC103… | opposed a measure that would have denied the downtown/core-area item | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2024-02-29 | Nay | Removed $100,000 per year (2024-2027) in capital funding for the Downtown Plan Small Scale Projects program from the base capital budget. | (3.27) Amendment - Capital Project PD1218 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Capital Project PD121… | opposed a measure that would have denied the downtown/core-area item | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2024-02-08 | Nay | Removed Capital Project RC1036 (Dundas Place Equipment) funding from the multi-year budget. (committee stage) | Amendment - Capital Project RC1036 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Capital Project RC103… | opposed a measure that would have denied the downtown/core-area item | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2024-02-08 | Nay | Removed Capital Project PD1218 (Downtown Plan Small Scale Projects) funding from the multi-year budget (re-vote of the same amendment). (committee stage) | Amendment - Capital Project PD1218 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Capital Project PD121… | opposed a measure that would have denied the downtown/core-area item | Motion Passed (8 to 7) |
| 2024-02-08 | Nay | Removed Capital Project PD1218 (Downtown Plan Small Scale Projects) funding from the multi-year budget. (committee stage) | Amendment - Capital Project PD1218 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to remove Capital Project PD121… | opposed a measure that would have denied the downtown/core-area item | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2023-06-20 | Yea | Approved $100,000 in one-time funding from the Operating Budget Contingency Reserve for the Holly Jolly Market and Downtown for the Holidays events. (committee stage) | Core Area Action Plan 2022 Review | Motion to approve part b) of the clause: b) one-time funding of $100,000 in support of … | approved the downtown/core-area item | Motion Passed (11 to 1) |
| 2023-05-30 | Nay | Would have revised the Core Area Land and Building Vacancy Reduction Strategy to direct: facilitating quick conversion of vacant downtown floor plates deemed feasible for residential use; creating community/creative spaces (studios, galleries, rehearsal space, pop-up uses) in floor plates not suited to residential conversion; and considering adaptive reuse of vacant downtown lands and B/C-type structures for targeted uses such as R&D, film production, and digital services. Failed 4-8. (committee stage) | Core Area Land and Building Vacancy Reduction Strategy | Motion to approve part e) of the clause: e) the above-noted Core Area Land and Building… | opposed a measure that would have approved the downtown/core-area item | Motion Failed (4 to 8) |
9 motions with no clear direction on this issue (excluded from the pattern counts above; shown for transparency, not as evidence of a position)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-16 | Nay | Would have referred the entire Downtown Reimagined plan report back for further consultation with downtown community partners and a report on any recommended amendments, rather than proceeding with the plan as presented; this failed. (committee stage) | Downtown Reimagined: City of London Downtown Plan | That the staff report dated June 16, 2026, entitled “Downtown Reimagined: City of Londo… | Motion Failed (3 to 11) |
| 2026-01-13 | Yea | Referred Councillor Ferreira’s downtown-revitalization considerations (a dedicated strategic pillar aligned with the Downtown Plan, activating the Core Area, added stakeholder consultation time) to Civic Administration and Deloitte Canada to incorporate into the next phase of the Economic Development Strategy. (committee stage) | Draft Economic Development Strategy Framework – Presentation | That the communication dated January 11, 2026 from Councillor D. Ferreira with the foll… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-11-20 | Nay | Would have specified that the free two-hour downtown/core-area parking program be funded from the Economic Development Reserve Fund for 2026 and 2027. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - Councillor D. Ferreira | That the motion BE AMENDED to include the following: the free two-hour parking program … | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2025-07-22 | Nay | Would have referred the Hamilton Road BIA and Old East Village BIA funding request to the August 11, 2025 Community and Protective Services Committee meeting, to allow time to receive a list of earmarked COVID-19 relief funding items from those BIAs, and requested a matching expenditure list from the Downtown London BIA. | (5.2) Funding Request for Hamilton Road BIA and the Old East Village BIA (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion, as amended, BE APPROVED. | Motion Failed (3 to 11) |
| 2025-07-22 | Yea | Requested that the Downtown London BIA provide a list of expenditures from its portion of COVID-19 Relief Funding. | (5.2) Funding Request for Hamilton Road BIA and the Old East Village BIA | That the motion BE AMENDED to add a new part b) that reads as follows: b) the Downtown … | Motion Passed (8 to 6) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Appointed the Canadian Urban Institute as consultant to develop the Downtown Master Plan for $415,000, approved the associated funding, and authorized staff and the Mayor to execute the necessary contracts. | (2.5) Downtown Master Plan: Appointment of Consultant for RFP 2025-001 | That, on the recommendation of the Deputy City Manager, Housing and Community Growth, t… | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2024-06-25 | Yea | Would have deferred further action on expanding the City Hall campus until unsolicited proposals were evaluated, and directed a staff report comparing those proposals against campus expansion on factors including cost, downtown revitalization, and housing supply. | (2.2) Master Accommodation Plan - Redevelopment of City Hall Campus | Motion to approve the following: b) that any further action relating to expanding the e… | Motion Failed (4 to 10) |
| 2024-04-02 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to report back with a funding source for free 1-hour on-street parking and with the ability to suspend that free parking during special events in the Core Area, without itself implementing either. | (5.1) Reduced Parking Incentive Pilot Project (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That the motion BE AMENDED by adding a new part to read as follows: “that Civic Adminis… | Motion Passed (10 to 4) |
| 2023-11-21 | Yea | Referred the 2023-2027 Core Area Strategic Plan back to Civic Administration for a comprehensive review, and directed staff to report back on next steps and the need for a new downtown master plan. (committee stage) | 2023-2027 City of London Strategic Plan: Core Area | That with respect to the 2023-2027 City of London Strategic Plan: Core Area, the follow… | Motion Passed (11 to 1) |
Cycling
Of the 13 divided votes on this issue since 2023 that had a clear direction, this councillor has a recorded position on 13 of them.
approved new cycling infrastructure vs. removed or denied cycling infrastructure
Only 2 distinct decisions since 2023 (13 recorded votes across them) — too few to describe a pattern. The individual votes are listed below.
Show all 13 votes behind this pattern (13 rows across 2 distinct decisions — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-08 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to implement the corridor recommendations, including new in-boulevard cycling infrastructure on Sarnia Road and Western Road and new in-boulevard cycle lanes on Philip Aziz Avenue, alongside pedestrian-signal, storm-sewer, and watermain work. (committee stage) | Philip Aziz Avenue Corridor and Intersection Improvements Project Update (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | b) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to take such steps as necessary to implement th… | opposed a measure that would have approved new cycling infrastructure | Motion Failed (1 to 4) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Removed the planned Windermere Road to Gainsborough Road active transportation (cycling) connection from the Cycling Network maps. | (4.1) Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps | Motion to approve part c) iii): iii) the Windermere Road to Gainsborough Road Active Tr… | removed or denied cycling infrastructure | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Removed the proposed Taylor Street, McNay Street, and Gammage Street routes from the planned cycling network. | (4.1) Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps | Motion to approve part c) ii) B.: B. Taylor Street, McNay Street and Gammage Street; | removed or denied cycling infrastructure | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Would have removed the proposed Huron Street route from the planned cycling network. | (4.1) Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps | Motion to approve part c) ii) A.: ii) the following Proposed Network Additions BE REMOV… | backed a measure that would have removed or denied cycling infrastructure | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Removed the proposed Vancouver Street (Trafalgar Street to Wavell Street) route from the planned cycling network. | (4.1) Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve part c) i) C: C. Vancouver Street from Trafalgar Street to Wavell Str… | removed or denied cycling infrastructure | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Removed the proposed Sovereign Road route from the planned cycling network. | (4.1) Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve part c) i) B: B. Sovereign Road; | removed or denied cycling infrastructure | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Removed the proposed Royal Crescent (Clarke Road to Wexford Avenue to Admiral Drive) route from the planned cycling network. | (4.1) Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve part c) i) A: i) the following Proposed Network Additions BE REMOVED … | removed or denied cycling infrastructure | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2025-04-01 | Nay | Approved the Cycling Network maps overall, with specific street-level exceptions to be decided in separate sub-motions. | (4.1) Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve part c): c) the Cycling Network maps BE APPROVED, except: | opposed a measure that would have approved new cycling infrastructure | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2025-03-25 | Yea | Removed the proposed Windermere Road to Gainsborough Road Active Transportation Connection from the Cycling Network maps. (committee stage) | Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part c) be amended with a new part iii) and reads as follows: c) the Cycling Netwo… | removed or denied cycling infrastructure | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-03-25 | Yea | Removed the proposed Huron Street, Taylor Street, McNay Street, and Gammage Street routes from the Cycling Network maps. (committee stage) | Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps | That part c) be amended with a new part ii) and reads as follows: c) the Cycling Networ… | removed or denied cycling infrastructure | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2025-03-25 | Yea | Removed the proposed Vancouver Street (Trafalgar Street to Wavell Street) route from the Cycling Network maps. (committee stage) | Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | That part c) be amended with a new part i) and reads as follows: c) the Cycling Network… | removed or denied cycling infrastructure | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2025-03-25 | Yea | Removed the proposed Sovereign Road route from the Cycling Network maps. (committee stage) | Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps | That part c) be amended with a new part i) and reads as follows: c) the Cycling Network… | removed or denied cycling infrastructure | Motion Passed (9 to 6) |
| 2025-03-25 | Yea | Removed the proposed Royal Crescent (Clarke Road to Wexford Avenue to Admiral Drive) route from the Cycling Network maps. (committee stage) | Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps | That part c) be amended with a new part i) and reads as follows: c) the Cycling Network… | removed or denied cycling infrastructure | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
5 motions with no clear direction on this issue (excluded from the pattern counts above; shown for transparency, not as evidence of a position)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-22 | Nay | Would have directed staff to report back to a future Budget Committee meeting with a full list of approved future cycling lane projects, their locations, timelines, capital costs, funding sources, and maintenance costs — a request for information, not a funding decision. (committee stage) | Budget 2026 Cost Savings Opportunities - Cycling Lane Projects - Councillor S. Stevenson | That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to a future meeting of the Bud… | Motion Failed (4 to 10) |
| 2025-04-01 | Yea | Changed the Huron Street cycling project’s priority tier to ‘medium-term’ (after a separate motion to remove it from the network entirely had just failed). | (4.1) Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps | Motion to approve part c) ii): ii) Huron Street BE CHANGED to medium-term cycling project; | Motion Passed (14 to 1) |
| 2025-03-25 | Yea | Recommended approving, as amended, the Cycling Network maps as a whole — approving the network overall while excluding the five specific routes (Royal Crescent, Sovereign Road, Vancouver Street, Huron/Taylor/McNay/Gammage Streets, and the Windermere-Gainsborough connection) separately voted out. | Mobility Master Plan Mobility Networks Maps (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve part c), as amended. | Motion Passed (11 to 4) |
| 2024-08-27 | Nay | Would have directed Civic Administration to flag a Hamilton Road Streetscape update (Adelaide St to Highbury Ave) for identification within the Mobility Master Plan — noting it could include a reconfigured three-lane layout with protected bike lanes and accessible sidewalks — with any large-scale redesign considered in the 2028-2031 budget cycle, and directed preparation of a budget amendment for future consideration; failed 5-10 at Council (a companion motion with identical text passed 5-1 at the earlier Civic Works Committee stage). | (4.2) Councillor H. McAlister - Update to the Hamilton Road Streetscape Master Plan | That the following actions be taken with respect to the communication dated August 1, 2… | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2024-08-13 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to flag a Hamilton Road Streetscape update (Adelaide St to Highbury Ave) for identification within the Mobility Master Plan — noting it could include a reconfigured three-lane layout with protected bike lanes and accessible sidewalks — with any large-scale redesign considered in the 2028-2031 budget cycle, and directed preparation of a budget amendment for future consideration. (committee stage) | Councillor H. McAlister - Update to the Hamilton Road Streetscape Master Plan (links to the meeting page — this item shares its heading with another motion, so no single-motion anchor is possible) | Motion to approve the motion, as amended. | Motion Passed (5 to 1) |
Policing
Of the 6 divided votes on this issue since 2023 that had a clear direction, this councillor has a recorded position on 6 of them.
increased the police budget or complement vs. reduced the police budget or complement
Only 4 distinct decisions since 2023 (6 recorded votes across them) — too few to describe a pattern. The individual votes are listed below.
Show all 6 votes behind this pattern (6 rows across 4 distinct decisions — some decisions had more than one recorded sub-motion or meeting stage, or a recorded absence/recusal alongside a vote)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Their vote moved toward | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Nay | Would have reduced the London Police Service operating budget by $1,616,600/year for 2025-2027, cutting the tax levy by the same amount each year. (committee stage) | (ADDED) Amendment - London Police Services Operating Budget - Councillor S. Franke | That the Mayor’s 2025 Annual Budget Update BE AMENDED by reducing the London Police Ser… | opposed a measure that would have reduced the police budget or complement | Motion Failed (4 to 11) |
| 2024-02-29 | Nay | Would have reduced Business Case No. P-29 – Police Vehicle and Equipment Requirements funding by a specified dollar amount each year (2024-2027). | (3.8) Business Case No. P-29 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED by reducing Business Case No. P-29… | opposed a measure that would have reduced the police budget or complement | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2024-02-29 | Nay | Would have reduced Business Case No. P-29 (Police Vehicle and Equipment Requirements) funding by 5%. | (3.8) Business Case No. P-29 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED by reducing Business Case No. P-29… | opposed a measure that would have reduced the police budget or complement | Motion Failed (7 to 8) |
| 2024-02-15 | Nay | Would have added funding for four housing/homelessness-support business cases (Hoarding/Extreme Clean, Housing Stability Bank, Housing Stability Table, Housing Support Case Management), fully offset by an equal, explicit reduction to the London Police Service operating budget (roughly $1.7-2.25 million per year). (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-15, No. P-16, No. P-17, No. P-18 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include Business Case No. P-15 … | opposed a measure that would have reduced the police budget or complement | Motion Failed (3 to 12) |
| 2024-02-08 | Nay | Would have added $300,000/year in funding for winter maintenance (sweeping and plowing) of boulevard bike lanes, funded entirely by an equal, offsetting reduction to the London Police Service operating budget (net zero tax levy impact). (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-53 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to include Road Safety Initiati… | opposed a measure that would have reduced the police budget or complement | Motion Failed (4 to 11) |
| 2024-02-02 | Nay | Would have reduced Business Case No. P-29 (Police Vehicle and Equipment Requirements) funding by $90,000 per year. (committee stage) | Amendment - Business Case No. P-29 | That the Mayor’s 2024-2027 Multi-Year Budget BE AMENDED to reduce Business Case No. P-29 –… | opposed a measure that would have reduced the police budget or complement | Motion Failed (6 to 9) |
8 motions with no clear direction on this issue (excluded from the pattern counts above; shown for transparency, not as evidence of a position)
| Date | Their vote | What a yea did | Item | Motion (excerpt) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-21 | Yea | Approved part e) of the amended motion, directing that the feasibility report also address impacts on existing service-delivery models with a specific focus on a mixed CIR/Special Constable staffing model. | (4.4) City of London Special Constable Program | That the following part of the main motion, as amended, BE APPROVED: e) potential impac… | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2026-07-21 | Yea | Approved parts a), b), c), d), and f) of the amended motion directing the Civic Administration to report back to the Community and Protective Services Committee on the feasibility of implementing a permanent City of London Special Constable Program. | (4.4) City of London Special Constable Program | That the following parts of the main motion, as amended, BE APPROVED: That the Civic Ad… | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2026-07-21 | Yea | Approved part d) of the amended report-back request, directing that the feasibility study include estimated costs, funding options including Automated Speed Enforcement Program revenue, and the financial feasibility of a permanent program. | (4.4) City of London Special Constable Program | That the following part BE APPROVED: d) estimated capital and operating costs, funding … | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2026-07-21 | Yea | Amended the wording of the feasibility report-back request to reframe it around a ‘permanent’ Special Constable Program and to add legislative authority over traffic and school-zone enforcement to what the report on legislative/regulatory requirements must cover. | (4.4) City of London Special Constable Program | That the following part BE APPROVED: That the motion BE AMENDED by replacing the words … | Motion Passed (10 to 5) |
| 2026-07-21 | Yea | Amended the wording of part e) of the requested Special Constable Program feasibility report to add a specific focus on a mixed CIR/Special Constable staffing model. | (4.4) City of London Special Constable Program | That part e) of the motion be amended to read as follows: e) potential impacts on exist… | Motion Passed (13 to 2) |
| 2026-07-21 | Nay | Would have referred the Special Constable Program feasibility item to the August 25, 2026 Council meeting, to give the public more time to review and comment before Council acted on it; this failed. | (4.4) City of London Special Constable Program | That the matter relating to a City of London Special Constable Program BE REFERRED to t… | Motion Failed (5 to 10) |
| 2026-07-13 | Yea | Would have amended the requested feasibility report to reframe it around a ‘permanent’ Special Constable Program and add legislative authority over traffic and school-zone enforcement to the report’s scope; this failed on a tie vote. (committee stage) | City of London Special Constable Program | That the motion BE AMENDED by replacing the words “establishing a City of London Specia… | Motion Failed (3 to 3) |
| 2026-07-13 | Yea | Directed Civic Administration to report back to the Community and Protective Services Committee on the feasibility of establishing a City of London Special Constable Program, covering implementation models, costs, legislative requirements, and service-delivery impacts. (committee stage) | City of London Special Constable Program | That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to the Community and Protectiv… | Motion Passed (4 to 2) |
Sample sizes above count only votes where Jerry Pribil cast a yea or nay on a motion the verified per-motion classification (see methodology) could place on a clear “for”/“against” axis. A recusal means the councillor formally withdrew from discussing and voting on that item — this data does not record why, so no reason is asserted here — and, like an absence, is shown separately in each issue’s summary line and never counted as a position. Only sitting councillors get a stance profile on this hub; challengers don’t yet have a council voting record to summarize.
Methodology: A “divided” vote is any council or committee motion since January 1, 2023 that wasn’t approved unanimously and wasn’t a routine procedural step, and it doesn’t include a vote decided by secret ballot to fill an appointment, since those don’t produce a recorded yea or nay by councillor. For each councillor, on each issue, on each axis: a vote counts as “for” when it matched that axis’s more permissive outcome, and “against” when it matched the more restrictive one — but a nay is never described as if it enacted the restrictive outcome; it’s described as opposing the motion it was cast on, and the same care is taken in the other direction. When every recorded vote on an axis since January 1, 2023 happens to fall on one side, the pattern sentence says so plainly instead of silently reporting a zero on the other side. Every motion’s issue, axis, and direction (“what a yea did”) come from an independent, motion-by-motion review, checked against that motion’s own complete text in the official meeting record rather than a keyword search, with a small, separately published list of after-the-fact corrections applied on top — never a silent edit to the reviewed record. This is a genuine reading of what each clause did, not a raw yea/nay count, including for the generic “approved or denied the item” description used when no issue-specific axis applies. Recusals and absences are always counted on their own, never folded into “against” and never treated as a hidden position. A pattern sentence is only stated once a councillor has at least 5 separate underlying decisions on an axis — a committee vote followed later by a council vote on the same policy question counts as one decision, not two, so a motion with several stages can’t inflate the count; below that threshold the individual votes are still shown, just without a summary sentence. Some motions were reviewed and confirmed to have no clear direction at all — a referral, a request for more information, or a genuinely ambiguous clause — and these are listed, on every relevant issue, as motions with no clear direction: never counted in any pattern or sample size, but never hidden either. This project has no source recording which committee a councillor belongs to — that list isn’t published or collected anywhere; a meeting’s own attendance record shows who was there that day, not who belongs to it. So when a councillor has no recorded vote on a motion, nothing is claimed about why, in either direction: only whether that meeting’s own record separately listed this councillor as present without a recorded vote, or whether nothing else can be said at all. Before any of the above, motions were also dropped in 2 ways, none of them guessed at or repaired: 32 where the same person was recorded as voting more than one way on the same motion (a roster conflict in the source data); and 12 more that turned out, on review, not to be a genuine division at all — a lopsided result the source data’s own “unanimous” marker missed, or the same motion recorded twice under two item numbers. Each motion is filed under exactly one issue, so a motion that touches two topics — a housing decision with a budget line, say — appears on one issue page only, never both. Where the source text has a hash symbol immediately followed by a case or item number — as in a title reading “Business Case”, then a hash, then “P-5” — this hub shows it instead as “Business Case No. P-5”, so the character can’t be misread as a link; the underlying wording is not otherwise changed.